Hey, Vas! Let's go over my "shitpost", shall we?
VibeBox wrote:
You guys are cute.
In other news, I like to actively discourage laziness, so...no.
Here I dismiss the wagon on me as lazy and contentless, and outright refuse to answer a question.
And yet I haven't been piled on for it!
Probably because I am right.
This was useful to the game.
The above is also the retroactive answer to:
VasudeVa wrote:
VibeBox, opinions on the wagon on you.
So, my post was shit because it was "all basically available in thread", yet you felt the need to ask a question I answered
in that same "shitpost".
VibeBox wrote:
podium123456 wrote:wait... let me pull a fate
Fate wrote:
I have other games I replaced into that take precedent.
OMG guys, he just told us he's going to be lurking... and... SCUM LURK.
HOLY GOD!! Wagons! Big WAGONS! NAO!
derpaderpa derp.
edit: ninjad
Try not to shitpost.
podium123456 wrote:Fate wrote:
HERAPDERPA IM GONNA MOCK FATE INSTEAD OF TRYING TO GET A READ ON HIS ALIGNMENT BECAUSE IM SCUM
*facepalm*
If i'm scum then why do i need to try and get a read on your alignment, dumbass?
HOO BOY... we in for a good one here folks.
u r a fail.
This was an
enormous
failure to understand a simple argument from his opponent. There was no reason for me not to comment on it, and it puts me on the record in another issue.
VibeBox wrote:Ghost is AOKAIE by my.
Vas and Zinive are not.
This is me providing my current reads, including two players as yet unmentioned (one of them being you, and you admit that I was right to say so because of your contentless post)
So...
VasudeVa wrote:VibeBox wrote:
What,
precisely
, in my post you were referring to meets this criteria?
VasudeVa wrote:Your
whole
#65.
Why don't you tell us why these comments are...
VasudeVa wrote:stale shit openly available in thread
VasudeVa wrote:
Soo, because I misunderstood your fancy-shmancy hip version of 'Okay', thinking that you were calling me and Zinive not fail when you had little reason to say so, I'm automatically calling for brownie points?
If you couldn't understand what I was saying why did you assume it was a negative comment, thus making my remark about you and Zi positive ones?
VasudeVa wrote:Because podium is a 'fail', what's your read on him? Do you think he's Town-fail or scum-fail?
It was actually "Null-Fail" before, but I wanted to push a wagon to keep us from relapsing into RVSishness. Now, idk, but he is definitely still some kind of fail.
Unvote
until I reread the thread.
podium123456 wrote:
@ Vibebox - i didnt see anything wrong with his vote.
I don't know who you're referring to here, or why you are addressing it to me.
Nachomamma8 wrote:Vibe, is Ghost still A OK with you?
For now, he is still ok, but losing points for not posting.
I didn't see the following post until Fate quoted it. (It was the last on a page)
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Vibebox wrote:Allowing an unclaimed player to reach L-1 seems awful. It allows for quicklynching and self-hammering.
And both the options you mention here have consequences. If you don’t like the site meta calling it awful isn’t going to do much good.
Consequences Scum only suffer if they make the decision that it is positive EV for them to do so, but w/e, this isn't the place for the discussion. If you don't agree with my opinion, making a pointless post about it isn't going to do much good.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Vibebox wrote:I'm sorry that a little intrawebs lingo is enough to confuse you.
It has nothing to do with confusing me. Nice try Tex.
Yes it does.
Also, Smear.
MagnaofIllusion wrote: It has everything to do with consistency in your opinion and posting.
Please point out a specific inconsistency in my opinion.
MagnaofIllusion wrote: You call someone out for crap posting and then post what is basically crap yourself. That borders on Cognitive Dissonance.
It would...if I had shitposted. You can answer the same rebuttal I gave Vas above if you want to continue to assert that I shitposted.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Vibebox wrote:He completely failed to understand Fate's point. Are you really saying you couldn't tell that's what I was referencing?
It’s clear he failed to get the reference.
Correction: It was clear he was
acting as though
he didn't get the reference.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:If your statement doesn’t indicate he is scum for doing so why did you post it? If it does indicate he is scum why didn't you just call him scummy as opposed to being cute?
You say "cute" (to make me look bad), I say "acting with some degree of subtlety".
I was going somewhere with that line of questioning, but your chainsawing has spoiled it.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Vibebox wrote:Vas & Zinive = not
I looked at your ISO. Your only mention of Zini is to call him one of the ‘funny’ guys and you only interacted with VV at ISO 4. So unless you are going purely on ‘gut’ here some support would be great.
It is quite early in the game, and at this point "gut" is half of it. Given the low number of posts by each of them at that point, you really couldn't deduce the reasons I didn't like either of them? (oh gee, I didn't directly call you scummy, oh noooo000! Now answer.)
"There is no royal road to science, and only those who do not dread the fatiguing climb of its steep paths have a chance of gaining its luminous summits"
-Karl Heinrich Marx