O299 - dh's mafia game of fun amazingness, for real (gaem)

[ThAdmiral]

I'm sorry but you've tempted me too much. Which game is it?

[Quaroath]

Redacted, formerly a link.

Do not talk about ongoing games as per a sitewide rule. -DH

[DemonHybrid]

VOTE COUNT

Day 1 Vote Count (#5)

Sparx - 5 (iamausername, Debonair Danny Dipietro, Elsa von Spielburg, TheJakalope, Quaroath) L-2
Elsa von Spielburg - 4 (Nobody Special, Thor665, chkflip, Sparx) L-3
Debonair Danny Dipietro - 1 (don_johnson)
TheJakalope - 1 (ThAdmiral)

Not voting - 1 (Cmpukahi)

If anyone knows someone who can replace Nobody Special, have them PM me. That'd be appreciated.

The deadline for Day 1 is April 23rd, 6:00 PM EDT. With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch and 6 to No Lynch.

[don_johnson]

unvote, vote: elsa

competing wagons are good.

thor: i was kidding with the douchebag comment. didn't mean to hurt your feelings. i just hate getting into wot wars over minor points. ddd was my rvs vote and i found it silly that anyone would question it or think that it was anything more than a joke. in any case, your reaction is town and i'll leave it at that.

Incidentally, I think VCA is junk analysis and no more reliable than taking a diving rod, pointing it at the screen and letting it point to scum posts. Just as a for example, the last time I was scum we were all on the first lynch and all three of us within four spaces of each other. I have yet to see evidence that it work any more successfully than random chance.

VCA can be quite useful in endgame, but like rvs, is useless without flips to place votes into context.

[Quaroath]

Yeah. Sorry about that chief. Shoulda been in a pm. Won't happen again. Didn't think about posting the link as talking about inflicts since I wasn't focussing game content.

Onward with this game!

[Quaroath]

@Don_Johnson. Are you saying both wagons are good wagons or just in general saying competing wagons are good.

[DemonHybrid]

Cmpukahi is being replaced due to inactivity.

[don_johnson]

competing wagons are good.

in general.

[Elsa von Spielburg]

d_j, I read your posts over and you've given all of 0 reasons why you think I am scum, just a simple vote justified by "competing wagons are good". Please elaborate. Does that mean you'd be just as likely to vote on any wagon? Either way, feels like a weak post/reason to throw out a vote on.

[don_johnson]

d_j, I read your posts over and you've given all of 0 reasons why you think I am scum, just a simple vote justified by "competing wagons are good". Please elaborate. Does that mean you'd be just as likely to vote on any wagon? Either way, feels like a weak post/reason to throw out a vote on.

i haven't given any reasons because i don't currently have any. if you want, i'm sure i can reread and put something together if it makes you feel better. and yes, i would be just as likely to vote any wagon for the same reason i just voted you. i wouldn't call "evening out wagons" a "weak" reason to throw out a vote by any stretch of the imagination. unreasoned votes are not scummy. scummy votes consist of bullshit. like when someone says, "hey that guys lurking, he

must

be scum," or "hey, that guy just voted without a reason, he

must

be scum," or "hey, heres the case on player x," but then when you read it, the case is full of holes and embellishments and such. i'm voting you for the clear purpose of evening out the lead wagons. period.

[Elsa von Spielburg]

unreasoned votes are not scummy

Out of the RVS? You've got to be kidding me. Willful failure to hunt or reason = scummy. You seem to only entertain two possibilities in your above post: no reasoning or bad reasoning. Sure, there will always be embellishments in some arguments, but THINKING isn't unheard of in this game.

Unvote; Vote: don_johnson

All aboard!

[don_johnson]

good luck with that. i like how you try to pigeon hole my post into the "no reasoning" or "bad reasoning" bs. thats awesome. you do realize its day 1, don't you? you do realize that you are voting me because i answered your questions

honestly

, right?

thanks for making me feel better about my vote.

[DemonHybrid]

Quilford replaces Nobody Special, and Amrun replaces Cmpukahi!

[Quilford]

Sup.

nod nod

I'll go through the thread and post my thoughts soon, hopefully

[Amrun]

Read the thread, formulating thoughts.

[Quaroath]

i think amrun is stalking me.

[Amrun]

Nope, just a favor for DY.

[Quaroath]

suuuure

[Amrun]

Chkflip: Town so far. Gets scumpoints if Sparx flips scum.

DDP: why do you think Sparx is scum? Break it down for me.

Don_johnson: you seriously want to lynch someone for intimidating you as a player? Sad. You're still town, though.

I will continue my ISOs, on phone so must break them up lest I forget. My apologies.

[Amrun]

Elsa: unlike others here, I have a townread on her.

Iam: I'd like you to outline your case on Sparx as well.

Quoroath: nul. Very fluffy.

[Quaroath]

Elsa: unlike others here, I have a townread on her.

Iam: I'd like you to outline your case on Sparx as well.

Quoroath: nul. Very fluffy.

It's the fur.

[Quilford]

Amrun / Cmpukahi:
Nothing to go on.

chkflip:
Voted Sparx, chatted with Quaroath, voted Elsa, asked her who scum was.

DDD:
Voted Sparx, accused chkflip of being scum with Sparx, calls VCA "junk analysis".

don_johnson:
Voted DDD on the basis that he is/was a "tough read", voted Elsa, said "unreasoned votes are not scummy".

Elsa:
Voted don_j, "this is what I get for trying to get discussion out of RVS", votes Sparx (provides good reasoning), votes don_j for saying "unreasoned votes are not scummy".

iamausername:
Consistantly tunneled Sparx.

Quaroath:
Sets up a nice trap for TheJakalope. Kinda undermines it by being a hypocrite.

Sparx:
Votes DDD, switches over to Elsa. scum scum scum

ThAdmiral:
Brings up good points about jakalope.

TheJakalope:
Falls hard into a trap set for him by Quaroath.

thor:
Brings up some good points against don_johnson.

Scumspects: Sparx, TheJakalope, chkflip, iamausername (in that order)

[Quilford]

and therefore
VOTE: Sparx

[Amrun]

Sparx: null leaning scum. Not much here to warrant an early bandwagon imho...

ThAD: null

Jackalope: null leaning town

Thor: town


Bah, I have no strong scumreads. Very little content so far.

[Amrun]

... Was that the hammer?