LC’s reaction to Gemini’s question and SnowBunny’s vote is Town.
--
Chess wrote:I want a nameclaim
To quote the Princess Bride – “Get used to disappointment”.
There is no Pro-Town reason for me to claim any more than I already have. Town has all the information they need to avoid mistakes while scum has no extra information.
BTW, I put this up top so you wouldn’t have to complain about reading.
--
Plum wrote:OhwowI'msofamous. I'm going to have to agree with you that, when applied correctly, this sort of buddying can be a concrete scumtell. So it's good he's been offed (???).
Are you seriously telling me that you bought Chess’s ‘Tarp’ as real?
--
SD wrote:You know what a figuratiive meaning or a metaphor is, Magna, right? It's not the exact literal meaning. Of course this is not Ragnarök. But there will be a great many of dead deities at the end of this.
Of course I do. Please don’t presume that you are much smarter than everyone else in the room because you aren’t.
The “Wrong Pantheon” angle was simply a way to kick off pressure on you. Anyone who sited that (and I will mention one specific person later in this post) as a good reason for a vote is scummy also.
Why my vote is a good vote has everything to do with the Plum-tell which you completely avoided in this initial response. Also you've begun a series of nitpicky attacks (going after Ranger for being 'mysterious', attacking CMAR on what is cleary a typo) as opposed to honestly scum-hunting.
SD wrote:That's really bad WIFOM. Sacraficing a scum member right away to maybe gain some slight influence on some easily impressed townie is hardly an advantageous tactic for scum. Not convincing.
You need to clarify what you are saying here. Who is the scum member being sacrificed and who are the easily impressed Townies?
SD wrote:Did you really just say cumslip O_o?!!?!? Twice!?
Anyway interesting how you come go all the way from "cumslip" via "reaching for" to "townfight"? Seems all over the place.
1. What scum-hunting purpose is there in pointing out a funny but otherwise innocuous typos in his post?
2. He’s pointed out that his statement makes clear sense and I overall agree. He’s calling “Wrong Pantheon” slip not a slip (it isn’t so he’s correct), says anyone pressing you on that issue is ‘reaching’, and that your interaction with Ranger is a Town on Town (this is the one aspect I don’t like as labelling an argument Town v Town so early is pulling a Zang). It is hardly all over the place.
--
Gemini-Katy wrote:Also, one more thing and then I will probably leave you alone - do you have any prior experience that makes you think this is a scum tell?
You specifically asked this of LC but I am going to give you some insight. I personally have seen scum on multiple occasions specifically avoid voting any player in RVS. Two examples are IdiotKing in Prison Mafia and Tclaw in Magua’s recently ended Donner Party Part 2 Open game. Neither had an established history of making those kinds of votes. This is why I investigated SnowBunny’s history.
--
CMAR wrote:I don't think that the him calling MoI town is necessarily scummy as I happened to do the same thing right up there ^ However I considered the possibility of him being scum, I just say that we need to consider him town so I guess there is a small difference.
You’ve more or less hit the nail on the head but I want to clarify why I find SD’s statement scummy. Everyone else is exercising some level of scepticism even if they find it is a Pro-Town move. Shadow has none of that in his post – he calls me Confirmed, which is stronger language than logically should have been employed.
--
Quadz wrote:If chess really has a daykill, I might smack the mods.
Why? You are voting Shadow so you think he’s scummy. Chesskid fake-killed said scummy player. I don’t see why the daykill (which was obv-fake BTW) would be problematic in Chess’s hands under this set of circumstances.
--
Baby wrote:Vote SD
Lets start with the person who raises the wrong mythology.
If we decide not to lynch ShadowDancer here is where my vote is immediately moving.
1. Lack of content in post when there is already plenty to discuss? Check.
2. Horrible bandwagon vote for the absolute wrong reason? Check.
FOS – BabySpice
--
AV wrote:@Chess I can think of another hated god but I'm not sure how far we're getting if we supply MoI with names before he's had a chance to claim it. Why exactly someone's already offered another name, I fail to understand.
Let’s discuss some, shall we AV?
I’m not name or full or whatever claiming. The explanation to Chess above is exactly why.
But I want to get into your thought process here. You don’t know why people are supplying me with names? That sounds all nice and Pro-Town on the surface. But looking deeper it’s either bad logic or posturing.
1. We are in a game specifically crafted with Greek Gods and mythological figures as Town.
2. A mass claim would break the game unless the standard counter-measure is used – Mod provided fake claims.
Are you suggesting that scum don’t have Mod provided fake-claims? If you do think they have them and think I was gambitting scum I'd already have a name provided as safe and thus your statement above isn't logical at all.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
