Mini 380: Artifacts- Game over

[HackerHuck]

@Jules - Since your reasoning has presumably disappeared in the crash, would you be so kind as to explain why you think Nai is scum?

[Nai]

Apparently, my not posting because I have nothing to say means I'm scum?

[Norinel]

Vote Count:

lunalovegood- 2 (HackerHuck, Zindaras)
Nai- 2 (Coron, Jules)
Coron- 1 (Nai)
GreenLiquid- 1 (Stewie)
HackerHuck- 1 (conflux)
conflux- 1 (Nightfall)

Not voting (2): GreenLiquid, Jules, perfect62834

6 to lynch

[Stewie]

I kinda hate doing this shit from memory, but I'm pretty sure that I was startinting to find jules suspicious. My question to jules is, why did you decide not to vote for Nai in your first post after the crash - but still mentioning you found him suspicious - and later changed your mind with no explanation?

[Jules]

I put FOS in all my games on the person I had voted on because all the evidence was lost. We're not going to get anywhere if we don't start putting pressure on again though so I the vote went on

[lunalovegood]

Great I have nothing left to fall back on.

[Nai]

So... What you're saying is, you don't remember why you were voting for me, but you feel that a vote for me period is better than not, because 'putting on pressure' is better than voting for a good reason?

[conflux]

What have you all got against Nai? I don't see anything in particular...

[Zindaras]

I'm still voting luna, because I still think she was vote-hopping very blatantly before the crash. She hasn't done anything to convince me otherwise.

[lunalovegood]

How was I vote hopping I voted for who i thought was scum and i backed it up.

[Zindaras]

The whole problem for me was that you didn't back it up.

[Jules]

What have you all got against Nai? I don't see anything in particular...

The evidence was all destroyed in the crash

[Nai]

You could still at least say something.

[Nai]

EBWODP: At least by saying something to us, it doesn't look like you're just piling on a vote just for the hell of it. You earlier said you weren't voting for me because you couldn't remember why you were voting for me before. I assume you remembered, and, as such, you should say so. Otherwise, it's just putting a vote there.

[Stewie]

I put FOS in all my games on the person I had voted on because all the evidence was lost. We're not going to get anywhere if we don't start putting pressure on again though so I the vote went on

Putting pressure? What are you pressuring him to say or do? There's nothing for him to defend against.

[Nightfall]

Just checking in to say that I am still happy with my vote.

[Coron]

I put FOS in all my games on the person I had voted on because all the evidence was lost. We're not going to get anywhere if we don't start putting pressure on again though so I the vote went on

Putting pressure? What are you pressuring him to say or do? There's nothing for him to defend against.

Your defense of Nai is noted.

[conflux]

Unvote
Vote: Jules

For: Putting a fourth vote on someone for a possible slipup
FOSing someone and 4 irrelevant posts later voting for the same person(??)

I don't remeber ANYTHING of before the crash and now it's all the evidence I could find. Plus the strange feeling in my stomach that Jules is scum. Let's see.

[Coron]

FoI: conflux

(finger of idiocy)

I place FoSes then later go over posts and think about it all the time. Turns out things happening isn't the only thing that effects how you play.

However you might be on to something. I will do a reread on Jules in a bit.

[Zindaras]

We've had this discussion in the lost days, as far as I can remember. HackerHuck and I voted Jules for casting that vote, and Jules provided a good defense.

[conflux]

We've had this discussion in the lost days, as far as I can remember. HackerHuck and I voted Jules for casting that vote, and Jules provided a good defense.

I would appreciate a re-defense.

[Stewie]

I put FOS in all my games on the person I had voted on because all the evidence was lost. We're not going to get anywhere if we don't start putting pressure on again though so I the vote went on

Putting pressure? What are you pressuring him to say or do? There's nothing for him to defend against.

Your defense of Nai is noted.

It wasn't so much of a defense on Nai, but rather an attack on Jules. But I don't really think Nai did anything voteworthy. You can make a note of that if you want.

[Nai]

Welcome back to Mafiascum, really. Glad we didn't lose anything.

[HackerHuck]

We've had this discussion in the lost days, as far as I can remember. HackerHuck and I voted Jules for casting that vote, and Jules provided a good defense.

Something about that post rubs me the wrong way. It's a little too dismissive and relies on lost discussion.

Let's try and refrain from too much referencing of what we did pre crash, especially now that so much time has passed. I don't seem to recall placing a vote on Jules, but I can't really rule it out.

If this scenario did play out as Zindaras remembers, it would be nice if Jules could "re-explain" his vote.

[Norinel]

Well, I'm back. Give a day or two to let everyone else make it before another round of prodding.