Open 11 - Pie C9 (Game over) - before 400

ShadowLurker · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:01 am

Fircoal wrote:
Vote: Ernie
. That's for voting for me.

You didn't seem to want proof here.

And you didn't unvote through all your posts until the mod ignored your vote for him.

bird1111 · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:21 am

Vote Count:

Nightfall (2): Ripley, Shadowlurker
Twito (1): Nightfall
Fircoal (1): Ernie
Shadowlurker (1): Twito

Not Voting: Fircoal, Patrick

7 alive, 4 to lynch.

Fircoal · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:25 pm

ShadowLurker wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
Vote: Ernie
. That's for voting for me.
You didn't seem to want proof here.

And you didn't unvote through all your posts until the mod ignored your vote for him.

It was a random vote at the beginning, you don't need to vote with proof until it gets more serous. As for not unvoting, that was an accident. I meant to unvote Ernie went I voted for the mod.

Twito · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:40 pm

I'm likely to have problems with activity from today on as I'm changing of house on couple of hours.
It's in my sig aswell.

Ernie · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:59 am

Unvote
Vote Nightfall

Let's say I want to find out if someone will hammer...

Nightfall · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:36 pm

*Throws the hammer at Ernie*
Definately the wrong direction guys.

Twito · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:37 pm

Pssss claro que yo voy a hacerlo.
Problems with my activity from today on don't replace me I'll try to make it here once in a while.

Fircoal · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:38 pm

Ernie, do you want a repeat of Game 298?
Regarding that, your looking a bit suspicious.

Ernie · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:49 am

But that's not a majority on him, isn't it? I just skirmed through the thread and I think he's just got 4 votes.

Fircoal · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:52 pm

There are only 7 players in this game. 4 votes is a lynch.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:25 pm

Unvote Vote Ernie

Nightfall · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:12 pm

I REALLY hope that isnt 4...

Fircoal · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:14 pm

Nightfall wrote:I REALLY hope that isnt 4...

same here.

Fircoal · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm

Nightfall wrote:I REALLY hope that isnt 4...

I just checked it's only 3.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:20 pm

How lazy can you guys get, look at Post 101, then Post 104. 2 frickin posts in the middle.

ShadowLurker · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:20 pm

How about actually commenting on the action?

Fircoal · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:27 pm

WEll, I think it's either scummy actions on Ernie's vote, or that he really is confused.

Nightfall · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:59 pm

ShadowLurker wrote:How lazy can you guys get, look at Post 101, then Post 104. 2 frickin posts in the middle.

I thought Bird might have miss counted since ernie said he saw 4.

bird1111 · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:41 pm

Patrick on page 4 wrote:
Unvote

Mod did not miscount.

Patrick and Ripley prodded.

Fircoal · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:11 pm

bird1111 wrote: Patrick and Ripley prodded.

I'll seen both of them on other threads. hmmm.

FOS: Patrick, Ripley, Ernie, Bird1111

Patrick · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:58 am

It's out of boredom that nothing seems to be going on.
Why did Ernie intend to hammer Nightfall? It's too early and any case against him seems minimal.

Unvote, vote: Ernie

Ernie · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:33 am

*shrug* Vote for me if you want to, but I'm not unvoting Nightfall, there's as many good reasons to vote for him than for voting for anyone else.

Fircoal · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:34 am

Ernie wrote:*shrug* Vote for me if you want to, but I'm not unvoting Nightfall, there's as many good reasons to vote for him than for voting for anyone else.

Like what?

Ripley · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:10 pm

Patrick wrote:Why did Ernie intend to hammer Nightfall? It's too early and any case against him seems minimal.

I'm not sure Ernie intended to

hammer

Nightfall (though I agree with the rest of what you say here). He seems not to have had any clear idea how many votes Nightfall was on, or even how many votes makes a lynch in this game, and I really wish he'd try and make sure of these things before voting in future.

Or, of course, maybe he knew at least one of these things and is just trying to appear clueless. It wouldn't surprise me; it's hard to be sure. I'm not about to put him on lynch -1 when there's been so little useful discussion yet today. But he did move right up to the top of my suspect list, so I'm going to

Unvote: Nightfall

.

Ernie wrote:I'm not unvoting Nightfall, there's as many good reasons to vote for him than for voting for anyone else.

Please specify what these good reasons are.

Twito · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:04 pm

Patrick wrote:It's out of boredom that nothing seems to be going on.
Why did Ernie intend to hammer Nightfall? It's too early and any case against him seems minimal.
Unvote, vote: Ernie

Ernie wrote:
Unvote
Vote Nightfall

Let's say I want to find out if someone will hammer...

He wanted to find out if someone will hammer? Meaning that he knew he wasn't hammering and was waiting to find out if someone will hammer. Which I really can't see meaning that he intended to hammer.

unvote
Vote: Patrick

Fircoal wrote:
Ernie wrote:*shrug* Vote for me if you want to, but I'm not unvoting Nightfall, there's as many good reasons to vote for him than for voting for anyone else.
Like what?

Secound that. Like what? You stated as only reason that you were waiting to see if someone hammers.