About Miztef's list: it's not inaccurate if it shows who currently has the most chance of lynching, but I agree with the others that it isn't helpful, you'd better make a lynch of who you think should be lynched, with arguments.
It's a blatant restriction/requirement.
Yes. He could get a powerful bonus out of it.
There are 3 situations as I see it.
One was the one above.
Another is: Fake a ludicrous restriction and establish trust in the town's eyes because of the reason that: scum could just not be hampered with such a restriction.
The statement is true to a certain extent where it can be used by scum to be established as an alibi and be used in exactly this same manner/effect.
Third scenario: Horrible restriction. Mediocre power/bonus.
Given the fact that all power roles have 50% chance of occurring at this time, that makes him annoying, as well as potentiall useless.
The first situation is one I find likely, and you don't. I can understand that you don't find it likely, but from previous posts I understood that you don't even find it possible. That's one small reason to vote you. The second situation is one that I don't find likely, and you do. I still find it possible, but the chance that he's faking it is very small in my eyes, I totally don't see a reason why Guardian would fake his restriction. The third situation I also find possible, maybe as much as you. But if this situation was correct, I wouldn't think it was a reason to vote Guardian, as a power role with 50% chance of working with an annyoing restriction is still better than a townie. If you'd vote Guardian for this, you could even vote all townies, it doesn't make sense.
this day 1
we have nothing better to go on
the restriction is annoying
it could potentially be fake
it would be very annoying if the restriction carried on indefinitely.
We do have better things to go on. There is no deadline, and the random voting phase was over remarkably quickly. The restriction could be annyoing to you, but even so it's no reason to vote for someone. The fact that it could be fake, is something I find possible, but not very likely. If it was carried on indefinitly it would be annyoing, but again, that wouldn't be a reason to vote him.
To me, your only good argument to vote Guardian is that he could be faking his restriction. So we would have to discuss about that. I don't think it's likely, because he did so from the beginning of the game, and I don't believe Guardian likes this restriction, and the mod used 5 red words when Guardian forgot that.
.
Why vote and start a potential lynch with two people not saying a dang thing? You want to call that scummy, do what ya gotta do but I'm calling it "waiting till all the evidence is in".
