I know I'm delving into theory a bit, but here's the way I see it, using an example from this game. Hang em High votes Christ Cutpurse, to gauge his response. After getting it, he says
Now, this seems well and good, but it really gives you no information. If he's scum, Chris is going to be more aware of the fact that he shouldn't sound overdefensive, yes? Then again, a newb-town (as I was in my first game) may start butting heads with the first person to call him out on something (thinking that person is scum and trying to lynch him). Or, maybe you are town and you're just a reasonable guy. Maybe you're scum and you're good at sounding reasonable because you're being careful not to be overdefensive. Essentially, we've learned nothing, because it's all a crapshoot, even more so in this game because a lot of you guys are newer players who are more prone to making mistakes. It's a form of WIFOM IMO (although I'm by no means an expert, and some players would probably debate this with me), an important theory that everyone should read up on.Hang 'em High wrote: my real reason for voting was to see how you would react, and your response was reasonable and not overly defensive.
So, I try to be more passive, observing other's posts. When I feel I'm at the point where I want to make a case against somebody (more to convince the rest of the town than anything else), I'll probably become annoyingly verbose, as I am here.
Whew. That took up more than time than I thought. Hope I didn't come off as overdefensive