Looks like we already have
VOTE: Asphodelus
In post 8, furtiveglance wrote:Inside jokes ew.
I hope we won't have any jokes this game Big Terp - they can confuse things, which does unfortunately help the mafia.
I read up on your game together. I have a little bit of meta from both of you. We’ll see how it goes this game.In post 10, BigTerp wrote:Hey now!!In post 8, furtiveglance wrote:Inside jokes ew.
I hope we won't have any jokes this game Big Terp - they can confuse things, which does unfortunately help the mafia.
This. Did we know each other in another life?In post 11, BigTerp wrote:What is "Get 7-UP".In post 7, Asphodelus wrote:Good Day,
I will begin by VOTE: ItalionoVoD for the simple, useful reason of "Get 7-UP".
Look forward to playing with you all (and in most cases, again).
It is, but your opening post is hard to understand. I’m assuming it’s an RVS post, but I don’t get it if it’s supposed to be a joke so I figured you are possibly deliberately trying to make it confusing. Am I wrong?In post 17, Asphodelus wrote:7-Up is a soda and a game.
I’ve played mafia/wolf game, etc. since 2006. Take with that what you want.In post 31, TTTT wrote:it would be helpful if everyone could give a brief overview of their experience
Okay cool. Thanks. I take a look deeper later.In post 66, TTTT wrote:abdbla said he didn't want to put Asph at E-2 even though he scumread AsphIn post 65, ItalianoVD wrote:Sorry, don’t really know what going on. Anyone care to fill me in quickly.
so I put Asph at E-2
everybody (except abdla for some reason) said "TTTT you make no sense... Asph is on VLA"
and then Takemikazuchi02 in 60 assumed I am town
VOTE: Takemikazuchi02
Since 2006.In post 68, TTTT wrote:how long have you been playing online forum mafia?In post 64, ItalianoVD wrote:I’ve played mafia/wolf game, etc. since 2006. Take with that what you want.In post 31, TTTT wrote:it would be helpful if everyone could give a brief overview of their experience
Yup you’re right and that for you to find out.In post 72, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:How does that assume you're town? You could be just maf pretending to be doing pro-town things.
In post 72, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:How does that assume you're town? You could be just maf pretending to be doing pro-town things.
In post 76, CornPuffBuddha wrote:I do not understand TTTT's interpretation of T02's 60.
Italiano seeming somewhat null to me right now. @Italiano, could you give your thoughts on the game so far as soon as you're able? You asked for someone to fill you in but didn't really do anything more than that once TTTT did so. This could be called a reach, but it seems a little strange to ask for help catching up considering how little actual content the game has so far, feels to me like wanting to look participatory but not actually doing anything to forward the gamestate.
Oh sorry I guess I didn’t make it clear. Apologies.In post 90, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:You guys should take a look at game 2091 since half the players here played there and you may get an idea on our playstyles.
@ItalianoWe decided in scum chat that TTTT's bullshit argument was bullshit? You're gonna need to try harder than that.
In post 72, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:How does that assume you're town? You could be just maf pretending to be doing pro-town things.
This is what I meant.In post 76, CornPuffBuddha wrote:…feels to me like wanting to look participatory but not actually doing anything to forward the gamestate.
I couldn’t tell you, haven’t read much of the game, but I assume I won’t find anything substantive anyway. It’s only 4 pages. Things don’t really get good until around pg 10.In post 89, furtiveglance wrote:Italiano do you actually suspect either Take or Corn?
And yet you still vote me.In post 92, CornPuffBuddha wrote:Italiano's play here is so brazenly unreasonable that I am actually wondering if it's some kind of advanced flailing that no scum would be bold enough to attempt.
They would, but I’m gonna assume you’re telling the truth for now. Tell me about abdbla.In post 88, furtiveglance wrote:I am town. Then again scum would probably say that too.
This response is pretty fascinating. No, the proper thing to do is to answer your question first. See TTTT’s 31In post 46, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:@BigterpThis is my second ever forum and day start game. I have decent mafia experience but its in night start, pr heavy, non-forum formats.
The proper thing to do is answer the question then ask me in return. Why are you deflecting my question?
While I somewhat agree here E2 is not E1 or hammer. Pressure is fine and there is always a point to everything. I also think RVS was long done by the time TTTT made his vote.In post 54, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:What's the point of putting Aspho at E-2 when she won't be here for the next two days to respond? And during RVS too.
I was hoping you could elaborate more on this. Like what were you trying to convey with this comment. Or I should say what did you want the rest of us to get out of it?In post 60, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:Everyone can see what you're doing though so we're not gonna get good information out of this.
Why did you pick me and Corn here. What stood out or didn’t stand out for that matter about both of us that made you feel pressure would have been good for either?In post 63, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:This 61 too. If you want to put someone at E-2 to create discussion then voting for Italiano or Corn over someone who's V/LA is a no brainer.
I facetiously responded to this, so I’ll give it a proper one.In post 72, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:How does that assume you're town? You could be just maf pretending to be doing pro-town things.
Your response here shows me that it worked.In post 77, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:TTTT is probably just spewing any bullshit he can think of to get reactions. I don't like his attitude but its NAI.
I’m happy you said this because I did check out that game and I gotta say that your tone from that game to this one is pretty seismic.In post 90, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:You guys should take a look at game 2091 since half the players here played there and you may get an idea on our playstyles.
I said what I said as more of a joke. I do that just to see what people say about it. It’s a reaction test. And I know it’s one of those things that are pretty much impossible to answer without the person having a particular perception of you, but even subtle little cues can mean a lot. I’ll just keep your responses in mind for later.In post 98, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:You're making no sense italiano. Explain your thought process about me and corn clearly.
I thought the same thing when I first came on this site, but then I saw it happen more times than I thought it should and I became somewhat of a believer. I have yet to use it myself, but I also don’t 100% disregard it.In post 103, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:Thinking saying hi at the beginning of a game is in any way alignment indicative is the dumbest thing I've heard on this website.
Well it’s not complete. I need to talk and interact with Take first. Then I’ll get a better idea of where he is.In post 113, furtiveglance wrote:Italiano, you're being too mysterious for me. You said you were reaction checking Take with your strange jokes and implied that the reaction was suspicious, without really explaining why. 111 mostly explains your own behaviour rather than scumcasing Take.
I didn't ignore it. It just wasn't relevant to what I was pointing out.In post 115, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:I explained this is my next post. Why are you ignoring that?
Well then you'll be wrong. RVS doesn't have a set time frame. And even if it did what wouldIn post 115, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:I'm not gonna argue about RVS semantics for a second game in a row. My definition of RVS means we will be in RVS for most of day 1.
Ahh. Duly noted.
How do you think there would have been much more information? If you can please elaborate on that without using Asphodelus was V/LA.In post 115, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:Because you would both have been at E-2 if TTTT voted for you and we would have gotten much more information if that happened.
In 2091 your tone was pleasant. And you only became frustrated or agitated when it was genuinely warranted. I felt from your first 10 or so posts that you were town and I would have probably said so if I was in that game. This game so far what I get from your tone is agitation, annoyance, and irritation. I haven't seen a reason for this. It's pretty much the same playerlist as last game so it's not like you hate the players. I'm assuming it's because of a change in alignment from last game. Subtle changes in a person's psychology when playing as scum or and then as town is a scientific reality. I think this is what's happening here. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am in this instance.In post 115, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:What does this mean?
Again, they're not random or meaningless. It's also not foolproof, so I would never base my read 100% on it, but I also would not totally disregard because as has already been shown, it does have some bearing statistically. Just because you don't like it or think it's dumb doesn't mean isn't real.In post 111, ItalianoVD wrote:Honestly, I don't care about the Dunning-Kruger of veterans thinking random meaningless things are actual tells because of their cognitive bias. I'm not gonna take this subject seriously from now on.
Oh no, I think I'm smart, but not smarter than everyone. This is how I play and like I said I've been playing forum mafia since 2006 so I've literally seen it all and done it all. It's hard not to come off as arrogant or overbearing, but I try my best not to.In post 111, ItalianoVD wrote:Its better if you came out clean with your thoughts instead of acting you're smarter than everyone and justifying your stupid questions with "I was just testing you". Don't forget everyone has the same vote you do.
In post 130, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:You don't think putting someone who's not in V/LA at E-2 would give us more information than someone who can't even reply? This is why your questions are stupid.
You didn't actually. I asked if you could detail an answer for me, but you say this:In post 138, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:I literally answered it though
You literally asked a question to "answer" a question. That's not an answer. I'm not trying to be difficult I'm trying to get you to open up because a lot of your answers to everyone have been frustrated one liners with nothing to go by. Where is the eloquence you had in 2091?"You don't think putting someone who's not in V/LA at E-2 would give us more information than someone who can't even reply?"
Yeah, yeah I know it seems like that, but if you could let me do what I do, I promise I will open up fully at the right time. Sometimes I don’t fully open up due to not wanting to give scum ideas that they may have not thought about. I know people can see it as anti-town, butIn post 141, furtiveglance wrote:Italiano's gameplay at the moment is scum+. Town should make an effort to be open and I don't see that. I also think it's easy to fake reads by acting mysterious.
This is a very thought out post. I highly appreciate it. +1In post 142, CornPuffBuddha wrote:To respond to 137, I don't think my answer will be as relevant as the others because I was scum in that game, so being an adversary with Take probably changed my view of them in that one, though their playstyle seems generally fine. Took them a bit to get to grips with the format but that's everyone. They seem quick to irritate which I'm not a huge fan of from a player perspective but from a game perspective it's probably NAI. In fact, I'd expect newbscum to be less quick to irritate and more focused on passing off an image of being cool, calm and collected. I know that's how I played my newbscum game.
Fair enough. I promise you it’ll work out.In post 152, furtiveglance wrote:No rush. I'm scumleaning you despite your protests, but not voting you. I want to give others including Aspho time to read and contribute
I’m not playing games at all. I’m telling you what’s happening. I think you’re scum. Period.In post 156, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:Stop playing games Italiano and come clean about everything. i couldn't care less about your 300IQ secret plan.
Okay geez dude. Chill out.In post 159, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:And once against you don't aknowledge my reply.
Give the rest of the players time to come in so they can catchup and interact with the playerlist.
Okay perfect thanks for that. Like I said, I’ve never actually used it myself, but I’ve seen it happen more times than I thought it should. Like I’m trying to tell Take, no one is using it as an end all be all read tool, but I think in this queue it is something you can’t justIn post 150, TTTT wrote:it's notIn post 102, ItalianoVD wrote:TTTT and Val. Are opening Hi and Intro posts still considered newbscum in the newbie queue or has it moved past that meta yet? I haven’t played a newbie game in probably like 2 years.allHi and Intro posts
it's more "greeting the entire thread as a group with enthusiasm"
it was consistently happening in newbie games a few years ago
enough that it was greater than random
and I compiled some data and "outed" it
it was never a tell to rely upon
just another tool in the toolbox
Yeah 86 was just ego and shouldn’t have been said. Apologies.In post 169, TTTT wrote:84 was straightforwardIn post 166, furtiveglance wrote:84 and 86 were the start, and since then he's kind of played up to the 'secret plan' shtick.
86 was weird
So 72 was for TTTT? I thought that was directed at me for 71.In post 176, CornPuffBuddha wrote:72In post 175, TTTT wrote:please show me cuz I missed thatIn post 172, CornPuffBuddha wrote:@TTTT
147 - I thought Take has already said that they did not assume that. Like I'm pretty sure they clarified immediately after.
This was for 183In post 186, ItalianoVD wrote:Notice my response in 73 94 and 111. Hmm. If that wasn’t directed at me then I can remove that out of my list of what I scumread Take on. If so, my bad, apologies for the mixup.
Apologies.
Oh no I still think you’re scum. But that wasn’t a fair piece to scumread you with since I misunderstood it.In post 208, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:@ItalianoPlease tell us how that misunderstanding made you think I'm scummy and what you think now.
My only strategy is to interact with everyone in the playerlist.In post 212, CornPuffBuddha wrote:Italiano, please front-load your reasoning a bit more so it doesn't have to be wrung out of you over the series of half a dozen posts. I don't know if this is part of your "strategy" but it is getting old.
I reiterate this again, before our interaction you were emotionally agitated by TTTT. Stop using me as an excuse.In post 229, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:You say I only got agitated when duly warranted but my talk with you warrants me being agitated and the game post the introductions stage has been dominated by my interactions with you and TTTT and most of the other's people's posts have commenting on said interactions.
Yes, but it’s also to cover all your bases and make sure you are 100% comfortable with moving forward. It’s not a blitz and I could be wrong so that’s why taking the allotted time is important.In post 235, BigTerp wrote: Italiano is basically saying they have it figured out, yet don't want to "rush" the game. The point is to win and eliminate mafia, not drag things out for whatever reason. Am I missing something here?
Well you missed it. I was already at E1.In post 254, BigTerp wrote: I'm comfortable with my vote on Italiano. Would like to see a second wagon to hopefully generate more and better discussion, but am not against getting Italiano back up to E-2 or even E-1 to see what might shake out.
Interesting take and something I actually had in the back of my mind but disregarded it because I figured it’d be obvious, like way too obvious.In post 282, BigTerp wrote:Take was saying that TTTT's vote that took Aspho to E-2 was basically pointless because they were going to be V/LA for a few days and it wouldn't help to move the game along. Those post (232 233) showed several examples of Take doing, what I thought, was something TTTT was hoping to get out of a vote to move Aspho to E-2. A reaction. In fact, Take had several reactions to it. From that standpoint, if Aspho is scum Take is the partner.
I didn’t think I needed to present it like that. What other interpretation do you get from let’s wait to actually eliminate until we use the entire time allotted.In post 283, BigTerp wrote:Fair enough, but that is not at all how you presented it.In post 281, ItalianoVD wrote:Yes, but it’s also to cover all your bases and make sure you are 100% comfortable with moving forward. It’s not a blitz and I could be wrong so that’s why taking the allotted time is important.In post 235, BigTerp wrote: Italiano is basically saying they have it figured out, yet don't want to "rush" the game. The point is to win and eliminate mafia, not drag things out for whatever reason. Am I missing something here?
In post 299, BigTerp wrote:As to your second part, I was just simply agreeing with Furtive that the back and forth between Take and Italiano early on could be a scum team. Rather far fetched, but possible.
I do. He's scum.In post 256, CornPuffBuddha wrote:He was literally saying shit like "it's only a game, nobody has to be mad" later in 2091. There's definitely something else going on, but the thing is I'm not sure what it is yet.
In what way do you mean?In post 311, CornPuffBuddha wrote:I will say that I don't think what Terp put forwards in 282 is necessarily true.
That’s the block I’ve been working with, which leaves Val, Aspho, Take, and Abd. I’m working with whom I think is the most likely Take partner.In post 371, furtiveglance wrote:I think a functional townblock is me, Terp, Corn and TTTT's replacement. For day 1 at least