Welcome to Newbie 2050. I am your host, Sirius9121.
The game is in
Hey! It’s been aIn post 13, RayFrost wrote:VOTE: Malakittens
I'm voting you, as you're the only person here who could possibly remember who I am.
That won't do. I need to maintain my air of mystery. The 2009 should beominous
I can see why he seems scum, and his response only makes me more suspicious of him.In post 15, AliceK wrote:Everyone checked in. Cute. From the entrance posts I suspect Charles and LoneMarkhor.
Scums more often give reasons to meaningful actions. Even if the reason is no reason.In post 16, LoneMarkhor wrote:Why?
EBWOPIn post 20, AliceK wrote:Scums more often give reasons to meaningless actions. Even if the reason is no reason.In post 16, LoneMarkhor wrote:Why?
I don’t really think that’s a scum tell; their reasoning isn’t any better than, say, mine.AliceK wrote:Scums more often give reasons to meaningful actions. Even if the reason is no reason.In post 16, LoneMarkhor wrote:Why?
That's everything I have right now. I am sorry. Reasoning isn't really important. The fact that you want to provide a one is.In post 22, Harumi Ayasato wrote:I don’t really think that’s a scum tell; their reasoning isn’t any better than, say, mine.AliceK wrote:Scums more often give reasons to meaningful actions. Even if the reason is no reason.In post 16, LoneMarkhor wrote:Why?
I would imagine that we want people to provide reasoning for this actions rather than vote without explaining themselves (at least once we're out of RVS).In post 23, AliceK wrote:That's everything I have right now. I am sorry. Reasoning isn't really important. The fact that you want to provide a one is.In post 22, Harumi Ayasato wrote:I don’t really think that’s a scum tell; their reasoning isn’t any better than, say, mine.AliceK wrote:Scums more often give reasons to meaningful actions. Even if the reason is no reason.In post 16, LoneMarkhor wrote:Why?