Anyway, director sounded angry in his postings as AP was
VOTE: director
In post 105, NovaDragon wrote:you'll exc'pt it; f'ck you.
In post 108, Venmar wrote:People should stop using read masking reads such as "unbearable", just call the guy scum or town, end of story.
In post 151, the director wrote:In post 149, Lastsurvivor wrote:the director, you're calling Matt scum for ignoring you then voting you when you've ignored him all game as well?
Your response affects whether or not I vote you so please make sure not to tell me the serious voting started 8 pages ago!
Not exactly. Here is my main reasoning:
MattP was directly asked to vote on my wagon, which he initially dismissed by posting a non-direct non-confrontational response of "lol noobs". I didn't post anything in between that post and the one where he voted me, yet now out of the blue he thinks I'm scummy because I was being a prick. The only thing that changed in the game was the number of votes on my wagon. Classic scum.
As far as the interaction bit, I noticed yesterday he really didn't respond to me at all, except when I responded to Lance's twilight post. Then today, he seemed dismissive of the wagon, up until it appeared there was enough heat for my lynch to go through. The fact that I haven't directly talked to him is not the issue.
In post 150, AngryPidgeon wrote:The team: Mattp/DeclanGiggs/Director
I'll see you all at the reception.
In post 460, AngryPidgeon wrote:For those of you keeping score at home, its still Dragon/Giggs. Im struggling with the 3rd, but leaning NameUser/Last Survivor.
Om is conftown. Im obvtown. Dragon and declan are obvscum for these noob-scum-tacular lines alone:
In post 457, NovaDragon wrote:AP, you drove the shit outta that one, so why should we listen to your words now?
This is a blatant discrediting attempt coupled with delicious appeal to fear AND appeal to emotion. Its like a package deal.
Dragon it is today.
In post 459, AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 457, NovaDragon wrote:self-proclaimed leadership does not make you an actual authority figure.
Yes it does.
In post 164, AngryPidgeon wrote:I don't think ever been more sure of my vote ever.
In post 72, AngryPidgeon wrote:Declan giggs and director are scum team gg.
UNVOTE: Nom nom
VOTE: director
Choo choo bitches
In post 150, AngryPidgeon wrote:The team: Mattp/DeclanGiggs/Director
I'll see you all at the reception.
In post 492, AngryPidgeon wrote:^ This vote. It pleases me. As scummy as Declan is, Im actually more certain of Dragon right now. And that is saying something.
Om should be considered obvtown unless the hider didn't submit an action or is retarded. (And yes I will rage at you if you are fucking my reads up by doing something else)
Aether, Om and I are both town so try again. I will OMGUS whoever the hell I want. It isn't a scumtell. And dragon's opening post was off-the-charts scummy for reasons you can find in my ISO.
Dragon needs to die today. Declan is the 2nd most likely scum.
I think Venmar is town. I also think Aether is town. Disturbed's last post is making me , but I do not care since he is voting scum right now anyhow.
In post 501, AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 500, NovaDragon wrote:I haven't counted, but I think I'm dead.
This is possibly the worst lie I've ever read.
In post 504, AngryPidgeon wrote:Venmar can't be scum because of the hammer.
In post 522, Lastsurvivor wrote:Nova's scum. From those last three pages, Declan looks like scum too. The way that he goes after Om and tries to discredit his conftown hider status is just scumrific.
AP, I dunno if this is too much to ask, but could you stop double/triple posting? <.<
In post 557, Lastsurvivor wrote:VOTE: NovaDragon
Here's a case since some people have been asking others for one. I'd be happy to oblige.
For me, the crux is when he apologizes for being part of the lynch in #457. I don't believe he was going to unvote. Dragon claims that he was going to unvote on the weekend*, yet in his post #153 on Friday he attacks director and gives every indication that he believes he's scum. So I see no motive for Dragon unvoting, despite his claim that he would have.
#481 also bothers me. At this time, his vote is on Declan Giggs (see #476), yet Declan does not occupy a slot in his scum team in #481 originally. Also, Venmar is included there, even though he has never interacted with Venmar previously.
See this quote:
In post 500, NovaDragon wrote:Every time you have your reads you've given no doubt to your scum tells. Why would you do this? You were wrong in two three of these scum reads at the very least, yet you say them with such conviction.
I don't get this. Apparently AP is scum for being wrong with conviction. There is nothing scummy about being incorrect, and there's especially nothing scummy about having no doubt in your scum reads. In fact, it's the opposite. So I don't understand why Nova is trying to incriminate AP for this.
In post 617, Lastsurvivor wrote:In post 611, NovaDragon wrote:First, I didn't apologize for mislynching; I apologized for lack of involvement, and I've already mentioned that saying I had intended to leave the wagon was a stupid idea.
Yes, sorry for the misquote. The general idea of my claim still stands though -- you weren't going to get off that wagon.
And scum do stupid things too.
As for the vote on Declan, I went along with it because I wanted to see how people would react...
Interesting. Why did you want to see how he would react?
In post 618, Disturbed_One wrote:In post 614, NovaDragon wrote:@Disturbed_One
I had to look it up myself. You are right with the terminology, but from what I understand it is usually accurate in finding scum if the bussee does it at a time that may result in a lynch. http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Bussing
That and it's really only applicable if the person bussing is scum
Yeah, well, I clarified what I actually mean. But nice try trying to twist my words around.
AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 833, Disturbed_One wrote:Fair enough, as I predicted someone had to make the case on my"180".
You are absolutely correct that AP was a strong town "read" from me. Keyword:"read". As the second quote shows, I was not able to back up why I felt the way I did with facts. It was more of a read than anything else.
I love how you have to surround read with quotes. We already know they're fake, no need to accentuate it more. /joke.
In post 833, Disturbed_One wrote:I believe it's highly possible that I haven't examined AP heavily enough until now.
And this statement is glorious. So, did you or did you not? And are you still examining me or are you just sheeping Fitzy for the rest of the Day?
(Fitz, I love how obvtown Im going to be when Disturbed flips. You are really all-in on this play of yours)
Distubed, your posts have a distinct lack of unique opinions. It could be partially a personality thing, but your whole reasoning behind "Well I thought AP was doing townie things, but maybe I didn't look hard enough, I'll just sheep Fitz" is pretty much a scum claim. And what is your read on Nova now? Read on LS?
In post 839, Om of the Nom wrote:No I wouldn't, I'd be using tons of expletives and yelling at everyone for being dumbasses.
In post 840, AngryPidgeon wrote:Hey look, thats what Im doing
In post 683, NovaDragon wrote:I changed my mind, AP is 70/30 leaning scum. AP's current basis as to why he and Aether are not scum is that they both are drawing attention to themselves.
In post 680, AngryPidgeon wrote: "Is shifting gears a scumtell? The last time I checked, they try to be somewhat consistent as not to draw attention to themselves."<--- this right here... I feel that this has only been said as a means to implant this idea into other people's minds; that you can't possibly be scum because why would you draw this attention. You've managed to sway some people away from Aether with it, so why not use it for yourself too? I give you 30% town because your points aren't entirely invalid... however your aggressive-defensiveness makes me really suspect that you aresomething...hiding
In post 885, Declan_giggs wrote:If you are hiding behind fitz tonight, that will help sort out nova tomorrow, since fitz scum means for sure nova scum.
In post 887, Declan_giggs wrote:I explained this. Fitz pushed the unvote strictness. If Fitz is scum, why would he save nova town on a technicality?
In post 899, Venmar wrote:In post 884, havingfitz wrote:My push on you WAS justified AP. You are playing like shit. The only thing saving you is your claim.
As for Dragon, my comment was"AP town = decent chance Dragon is scum".No one is clear IMO except for you and Om. I had Venmar up there on my list and I don't like the way he hemmed and hawed on you before flippantly voting you. Disturb could be scum as well but I like Venmar.
VOTE: Venmar
Also...not sure if anyone mentioned it butif my count is right.Disturbed is at L-1
- I don't really care if you think I am a better vote, you avoiding Disturbed means you're unwilling to land the hammer, as in you're unwilling to take the blame when he flips town. The fact you vote for me, and then declare Disturbed as L-1 is scummy as fuck becauseyou're trying to derail his wagon to me while simultaneously trying to bait someone into pushing Disturbed.
Point is, you're not playing from a town's mindset because even if you're pushing one of your "scumreads", you're trying to derail a wagon while simultaneously trying to keep the door open for the bigger wagon, this is a scums mindset because if you were town, you would just push Disturbed if he was your scumread rather than do 3 things at once.
Unvote
Vote: HavingFitz
Legit scum right here guys.
The Disturbed wagon has to die, there is nothing bad or wrong in how he has been saying and not to sound like a broken record, but Disturbed has been one of the most honest and genuine players as of yet.
In post 949, Declan_giggs wrote:Basically, AP fucked up when he was at L-2, but he has been DYING to claim all day. Now, he is DYING to die tonight and take a townie with him. And this is different than his fitz thing because there we have a tie to nova to also work out. If he des behind fitz due to fitz being scum, we have nova nailed too as there s no way scum fitz saved a townie on a technicality.
In post 975, Declan_giggs wrote:Unfortunately, the best we can do is assume he is a very unreliable hider for purposes of scum hunting today.
In post 697, Name User wrote:Reads list:
Om: I'd like to think is town, but continued, fruitless bickering with Aether is bothering me.
Nova: Nothing scummy.
AngryPidgeon: Angry! Towny town-asset.
Declan giggs: Scum.
Distrubed One: Lurky scum.
Aether: Most anti-town player in game. Won't be playing any games with this guy in the near future.
havingfitz: Walls of text and a slight smartass, but probtown.
Last survivor: Nothing scummy.
Venmar: Puzzling and lurky, making him scummy.
In post 1051, Name User wrote:Also Nova, please fix your vote tags.
In post 231, Name User wrote:Going with my gut, declan is looking scummy.
I'm wondering why we don't have a wagon on him.
And I'm pretty sure there is no declan-om team.
But anyway,
I don't like the people on the wagon, but VOTE: Om for now.
Matt is being pretty useless, but isn't hurting town too much, plus it's still pretty early, so let's not hammer him. (Like I said, I doubt he's scum, anyway.)
In post 232, Name User wrote:I'll change my vote for a Venmar or a Declan wagon.
In post 563, Name User wrote:
Fitz seems to be town, because I agree with most of his reasoning. NovaDragon is just unlucky town.
Somebody convince me that Declan is scum.
"If I'm hider"... which he isn't, and "behind Declan"... because why not talk the real hider into hiding behind NU's scum-partner to "find" scum, take care of hider, and still appear town.In post 599, Name User wrote:If I'm hider I'm hiding behind Declan
In post 697, Name User wrote:In post 561, Name User wrote:Oh, and by the way Om, I didn't really suspect you by the end of day 1, I just never changed my vote.
You said this looked town. Why?
In post 563, Name User wrote:NovaDragon is just unlucky town.
What events or statements constituted this town read at the time you declared it?
Hmm, not a town read. "Unlucky null" would have been a better word-choice. I meant that I felt the wagon on Nova was unjustified, there was nothing scummy about him in my opinion.
Reads list:
Om: I'd like to think is town, but continued, fruitless bickering with Aether is bothering me.
Nova: Nothing scummy.
AngryPidgeon: Angry! Towny town-asset.
Declan giggs: Scum.
Distrubed One: Lurky scum.
Aether: Most anti-town player in game. Won't be playing any games with this guy in the near future.
havingfitz: Walls of text and a slight smartass, but probtown.
Last survivor: Nothing scummy.
Venmar: Puzzling and lurky, making him scummy.
So, Giggs is scum, and there's scum in Venmar, Aether, Disturbed One. I'm still contemplating on Om.
In post 698, Name User wrote:Declan says: I played along with the everybody say their hider target thing, but it was a horribly scumtacular idea in truth and NOT the best strategy for the town to benefit from the hider role (not that we had time for a better strategy with the rush to lynch Dragon). AP also tried to open the door to me to "claim hider" (post 524) then lynch me when the real hider counterclaims. Scummy.
AP ask: Declan, why would that plan work for me?
1. Why would you be so dumb as to fake claim hider for any reason ever? Why would I think I could get you to fake claim hider?
2. Geting you lynched for fake claiming (AND THEREFORE BEING SCUM SINCE THAT IS THE ONLY FEASIBLE TIME YOU WOULD DO THAT) is scummy how? Even if I were retarded enough to think I could get you to fakeclaim as town?
Best I've seen so far, and that's why
VOTE: Giggs
In post 701, Name User wrote:Okay, I'd like to see him post something good, actually.
UNVOTE: Declan_Giggs
VOTE: Disturbed One
In post 877, Name User wrote:In post 698, Name User wrote:Declan says: I played along with the everybody say their hider target thing, but it was a horribly scumtacular idea in truth and NOT the best strategy for the town to benefit from the hider role (not that we had time for a better strategy with the rush to lynch Dragon). AP also tried to open the door to me to "claim hider" (post 524) then lynch me when the real hider counterclaims. Scummy.
AP ask: Declan, why would that plan work for me?
1. Why would you be so dumb as to fake claim hider for any reason ever? Why would I think I could get you to fake claim hider?
2. Geting you lynched for fake claiming (AND THEREFORE BEING SCUM SINCE THAT IS THE ONLY FEASIBLE TIME YOU WOULD DO THAT) is scummy how? Even if I were retarded enough to think I could get you to fakeclaim as town?
Best I've seen so far, and that's why
VOTE: Giggs
Why has nobody responded to this?
Declan's sliding out of scum territory, but you can't just disregard this.
In post 878, Name User wrote:In post 726, Declan_giggs wrote:Aether seems to be counting on his idiocy protecting him since a mislynch today leads to LYLO D3. We're lynching him at deadline if no better case emerges. I'm in, the deliberate WIFOM actually removes some of my doubt about the purpose of it for me.
In post 731, Disturbed_One wrote:Been re-reading through the thread and I've decided that Aether is obvious town. Declan trying to push through a mislynch on an obvious townie and setting up an out for when he flips town at the same time is... exactly what I would expect of scum to do.
I can see Aether being town, but obvious town? He's playing the exact same thing as last time, and Declan makes an excellent point, what the hell?
In post 879, Name User wrote:Disregarding page 32 except
In post 798, Declan_giggs wrote:
Here's where I see where we are: regardless of individual people's individual reads, which are wildly different in many cases, I can divide the players up into a few categories which make it easy for me to think about them strategically.
Lurkers/noncontributors: Name User, Venmar, LastSurvivor. To varying degrees these three players don't have much to say very often at all. This is more an observation about their FREQUENCY of appearing in the thread and less a value judgement on their posts that they have made. In my experience, this style of play is typical of a disinterested vanilla townie or a scaredyscum, who is afraid of slipping up if they say/participate too much. Given that there are 9 players (plus me) and 3 scum, and 3 players in this sub group, it is likely there is ONE SCUM in this lurkpool. Order of my vibe: scummiest Venmar, name user, LastSurvivor most likely town
Completely agree.
Dumbasses: OmoftheNom and Aether. If we weren't in crunch time already due to sad developments we can't take back, I'd be delighted to policy lynch either of these two, preferably Aether. But there is too much WIFOM here to make any call on these two. The good news for the town's win condition is they will just keep slapping each other and mostly stay out of the way. These two will probably get re-categorized for Day 3.
Except now Om is confirmed town.
Tryhards: This is not an insult (although I used it that way at AP earlier when he was just all about lynching a name any name). Fitz and AP. Both are trying to build cases, both have points that sway me, and both have points and occassional bursts of activity that I don't feel very good about. Each has established connections that especially in the case of AP I have talked about in previous posts. Either COULD be scum, my game-long suspicion has been on AP, and I still feel Fitz is more likely to be town, except under one condition I will discuss below. AP has stepped up his explanations for his FoSs, which isn't a scumtell, he clearly just realized that his original style was losing traction, so either way he had to up his game.
But Fitz's wall-posting verbosity is anti-town.
Lynchable, likely scum: Disturbed and Nova Dragon. Both of these players have managed to give a general feeling of scumminess to most of us at most points in the game. Mitigating Nova's scumminess for some people is how he reacted during pseudo-twilight, when his posts were pretty resigned in nature. This only slightly changes the fact that we intended to lynch him, and was saved by a technicality. We benefit from a ND lynch in that if he does flip town, Fitz is practically 100% cleared; why would scum have brought up the voting technicality if there was s successful town lynch? If ND were to flip scum, Fitz is quite damned although not as conclusively as he is cleared by a ND town flip.
Okay, Fitz is town anti-town, because I doubt Nova is scum.
We need to narrow our focus to these two players in my opinion (unless there is a STRONG appetite for an Aether policy lynch/roll of the dice? Didn't think so....) Let's disucss whether the gain from lynching Nova pays off, and whether a Nova scumflip means the hider should hide behind Fitz. If we cannot come to a consensus on a solid benefit from lynching NovaDragon, we should each post a read with a reason on Disturbed. Of course a few people will sheep a wagon on Disturbed, which is at their own peril. My own feeling is both could well be scum (together) and we aren't really going wrong lynching either.
So really just Nova for me.
An in all a very good post Declan.
In post 932, Name User wrote:
In post 920, NovaDragon wrote:Ven is still too hard to tell. While he has mostly voted townies (Om, AP, Director, Me... Especially me), 'unknowingly' dropped the hammer on me, and has been spewing some pretty lame stuff lately... His style and reasoning have actually seemed town oriented. I have a lean toward scum, but it isn't very strong, say 60-40.
Town oriented? How?
DECLAN ANSWER MY QUESTION PLEASE
In post 946, Name User wrote:I'm not sure what to say about Lastsurvivor's question to me, other than I thought it was rhetorical.
In post 934, AngryPidgeon wrote:NU, were you not calling Mattp and the other unbearables by
1. Mentioning only them in your opening post
2. Voting one of them with no other reason provided
Why did you feel the need to respond to me pointing it out?
Read on last survivor and giggs?
Because you were putting words in my mouth. Yes I said they were unbearable, but this was basically an RV, iirc the first 4 pages were full of useless crap by the time I got here.
Last Survivor: Null. Haven't really been paying much attention to him. (By the way, LS, I thought your avatar was a chair until I looked closely at it. )
Giggs: Town. It's a weak read, because I did think he was scum for a significant amount of time, he's not in any way cleared, but that's my opinion at this moment.
In post 1021, Name User wrote:That was real short-like.
Alright. I'm cringing at the fact I missed the entire day.
I'm doubting Giggs will flip town, so no need to worry about that.
And we're lynching Aether tomorrow.
AP, why'd you decide to hide behind LS? I'm having trouble understanding that.
In post 1060, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 1059, NovaDragon wrote:My only regret is that we didn't allow Aether to voice his opinion.
"OM OF THE NOM IS SCUM LYNCH HIM NOW"
Still sure you wanted it?