![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Random.org said go for benmage soooo..
VOTE: Benmage
killerX029 wrote:May i ask that this vote not be counted as a vote for me? as his reason for voting off grimmjow was that he doesnt like bleach. my name does not relate to bleach in any way
Sleuth wrote:This.
Captain Haoala wrote:I want to know what you know.
don_johnson wrote:51 kind of seals it. hellhound and killer are opposite alignments imo. townkiller = scum hound. scumkiller = VIhound.
lewarcher82 wrote:@Hell: please give me your read of Lurco.
Lurconis wrote:Hey everyone still here.
Anyway from my perspective if BenMage is scum then Hellhound is as well. I realize this is a gut read but with his RNG vote being Ben that is an easy way to try and distance himself from his partner earlier. He also didn't weigh in on benmage or gaylord which are pretty much what the last two pages have been about.
I realize this is a gut read
RNG vote being Ben that is an easy way to try and distance himself from his partner earlier.
He also didn't weigh in on benmage or gaylord which are pretty much what the last two pages have been about.
until he weighs in on the Benmage situation
lewarcher82 wrote:but I don't like hell's last post. There is something subtly scummy in the psychology of it, especially in the way he argumentates in the first half of it. When someone says:your logic is invalid, instead of saying:bullshit, I am town, a bell rings in my head. It's ringing now.
would have liked to trying meta'ing them, but their refusal to out themselves should not be regarded as a certain scumtell.
what bothers me in Gaylord's activity is the shortness of his posts... if he wants to vote ben, he should provide us with a case.
sleuth managed to do very little, so I appreciate the idea of pressuring him.
In post 358, Empking wrote:Benmage wrote:Empkinghow would you define your scum game?
Getting by and trying to get to endgame as quick as possible.
Empking wrote:Lets massclaim quickly before it breaks the flow.
In post 385, Benmage wrote:Hell what do you think of lucronis?
In post 386, Empking wrote:In post 384, Hellhound1 wrote:Also, mass claimquickly? Why? At that point we didnt have a time limit.
Nobody likes stalled games. Plus we still have the ability to CC it'll just happen during the massclaim.
In post 387, Hellhound1 wrote:In post 385, Benmage wrote:Hell what do you think of lucronis?
Urm, he's wrong, mostly.
Seemsto be legit scumhunting though, even if its all about me. Id like to see him scumhunt someone else, so i could compare the two. (Around current issues, not you, ben, i feel that failed.)
I cant figure out if hes tunneling because he wants a lynch or because he's trying to scumhunt.
We'll see.
In post 389, Empking wrote:In post 388, Hellhound1 wrote:In post 386, Empking wrote:In post 384, Hellhound1 wrote:Also, mass claimquickly? Why? At that point we didnt have a time limit.
Nobody likes stalled games. Plus we still have the ability to CC it'll just happen during the massclaim.
Yeah, less effectively. Especially if scum CC last. They already see whos claimed what. Also, they could claim VT and look like every other player so i dont see any advantage for town, only scum.
If they all claim VT then we'll have three confirmed town and scum in a position where they can't claim something to avoid the lynch.
empking wrote:
That won't work if they claim it in massclaim.
Unvote
HH - why on earth were you gone for so long? And why have you become active all of a sudden? I hope you have good explanations for these. My name is haoala.
Christine wrote:Part of the Captain Haoala team gets onto Hellhound for the random.org voting, but a question is brought up about why Sleuth was waggoning, which I am wondering too.
HH was fooled(?) by empking