but heres the thing, if the cop chooses people at random(yes, i know he doesn't) then that one
random
person will be confirmed innocent. then mafia will
not
choose a random person, they will choose the person the cop picked, then kill him. so in essence the mafia still kill a random person. but that argument is only saying that there is no downside to revealing innocents.
the upsides are good:
1) with the more innocents the town has, the less chance of a misguided bandwagon.
2)with more proven innocents, there may come a time where there are more confirmed, then un-confirmed. thus ending in a win(assuming no wrong confirmed.***)
3) the doc(i know we've got a doc, i have full confidence that is was a protection, and not a roleblock. ****). like i was saying, the doc can choose to take chances and try and outguess the mafia to stop their kill, or can just go the safe route(i recommend) and protect the cop. the cop is extremely vital to this plan.
oh and vismajor, maybe we just can understand each other, but when you quoted me and said:
I said:
broomhead wrote:
the way i see it, the more innocents we get the better. then we can just kill off the non-proven people and win the game
then you said,
vismajor wrote:This is exactly why.
the way i understand it is that you didn't want the innocents revealed. i did. so when you say, "this is exactly why" it says to me that it makes it harder for the mafia, so we shouldn't do it.
***i feel the cop is proven sane, unless its a HUGE cover up witch at this point there are too many people involved to be a cover up.
****oh and don't get all over excited that i said i know we have a doc. its apparent to me through discussion that we do. and i'd prefer not to say anymore. this is no way constitutes that i claim or not claim doc, and try not to read so far into the doc comment that it gets out of hand