JamesthePhox 3 - Sensfan, Yosarian2, Near
Near 3 - Singing Librarian, Macavenger, Joudas
PyroDwarf 2 - Coron, Guardian
Guardian 1 - Pyrodwarf
EvilGorilaz, JamesThePhox, Dasquian
With 12 people alive and kicking, it takes 7 votes to lynch!
wait, did someone replace in without you telling us?Claus wrote:JamesthePhonx
Responding to a prod.Guardian wrote:Near -- why are you posting in other games, but not here? Near -- when you do that -- have different posting habits in different games -- unless you have a good explanation for it, it is very suspicious, especially in the games you are posting less in (here).
At the time, I actually haven't posted much about the game other than the random vote. What posts of mine qualified as "ambiguous"? I can agree with "off-topic" on my first post, but that was the reason for everyone voting against me - because people thought I was trying to find reasons to start a bandwagon. I find your qualifications of my posts as "ambiguous" ambiguous.JamesThePhox wrote:To be honest, I also had mixed feelings while I was writing that paragraph mainly because Near's posts so far are so ambiguous and off-topic that it was hard for me to classify him as either mafia or pro-town.
I, indeed, didn't make any useful post at the time. But there were other people at the time (e.g. VH who hasn't been replaced yet) who both avoided questions and lurked more than I have.The fact that you singled me out at a very convenient time, when the bandwagon against me was getting stronger makes you scummy.JamesThePhox wrote:
So, you're right in saying that the post was a bit awkward and strange, however, it was because of the difficulty I had classifying him as either or. Ultimately, I feel that his posts have not helped town in scum hunting in any way, which makes him the highest on my suspect list.
After looking back on some of Near's posts, I think I'll stick with him unless other suspicions pop up. Vote: Near
Pyro doesn't come off scummy to me. When sensfan was obviously vote hopping, I actually saw her as pretty pro-town or experienced scum, but mostly pro-town. I found it slightly weird that Pyro questioned sensfan because of it, but I think it's possible. People get different reactions to same posts, and I don't think his reasoning sounded that scummy.Guardian wrote:Ok, Near, then, what do you think about Pyro? You haven't really commented on Coron (and my) suspicion of him.
You do know we have to lynch someone on day 1, right?Near wrote:To clarify, I find Phox is scummy but the evidence on him is not enough to want to lynch him on Day 1 unless we must lynch someone due to deadline constraints.Guardian wrote:Near, to clarify, Phox is your #1 target, but the evidence on him is so shaky you don't want to see him lynched?
Good, fair post. I will do a re-read tomorrow and see if I can come up with something different. But it's hard to make stuff up if I can't find anything.Dasquian wrote:I see no reason to take my vote off of Near.
Near, we're going to lynch someone today. Currently it looks like you. If you're pro-town, letting this happen will do the town a disservice, so why shouldn't we lynch you?
This is why weshouldlynch you: you are non-committal to the point of insult, which is a scum-tell, as trying to get someone you know to be innocent lynched as scum is pretty scary. Also, you're prone to extreme lurking while being active on the site, giving excuses about the game not having enough going on - sorry, but you getting bandwagonned is something you can definitely comment about sooner than L-2.
You say that "not posting a lot" isn't a very good case. You're right, it's not, but when you're avoiding the spotlight like you have been, you're avoiding the opportunity to give the town a better case, which is beneficial to scum and hence is anti-town.