Also, the 2nd last paragraph of my last post was @Muerrto...
Muerrto - 2 (Litral, Muerrto)
Not Voting - 5 (q21, massive, snafoo, starkmoon, Super Archivist)
I surely will, need some time to read through the recent arguments first though.Litral wrote:
@starkmoon, snafoo and massive: Post please, kthxbai.
@snafoo: Note that your "pairing argument" no longer works in incriminating massive. I'd love to see another post carefully analyzing everyone's posts.
Okay Litral, I think you look most guilty as things stand at the moment. In essence I agree with Muerrto that should he die and come up innocent it would big finger pointing your way. I did not agree that his plan should be carried out straight away, though, and did not vote for him, neither will I vote for you yet.Litral wrote:Ever heard of sarcasm? Is it not permitted in these forums? Is it necessary for you to continue with the ad hominem attacks? I would argue that you are childish for being so impatient and willing to rely on the "I have more experience" mentality. But let's leave that until later.
Again, q21, please explain why you think this is a good strategy.
q21 wrote: I agree that you idea is essentially sound. BUT I don't want to go into day 3 with some people having hardly checked in, let alone contributed. If massive also agrees I would probably go through with it.
This is true, very true. This, however, is not "good for the town", because if you think I'm scum, you should actually lynch me today.q21 wrote: In essence I agree with Muerrto that should he die and come up innocent it would big finger pointing your (Litral's) way.