Judging by the maths I did, I would say that giving coins to 4 people so they can do investigations is a good idea IF we give them to the right people. 0.8 chance hitting scum is good, and 4 confirmed innocents is good anyway. However, that's all changed if we give just a single investigation to scum. Claiming multiple coins could lead to problems but...well I wonder if a single person has none. If no one has no coins then we can all put 1 coin to the cause.
Is it worth a mass coin claim which doesn't involve saying how many coins we have, but just whether we have them or not?...I suppose it's not, as we don't have 4 people we can trust to give them to.
For the issue of farside, I believe it was just a simple mistake in maths on her part. There's no evidence in there that she knows the amount of scum there are.
armlx wrote:Cream, indifference to minor cases is pretty scummy
Notice the word 'pretty'. There are a couple of people (not you, though you have your vote on me) who seem to be desperate for my lynch for this 'pretty' scummy thing, coupled with a single mistake. This is the point I made earlier, Gimbo's roleclaim means that some people seem to not care anymore about getting the right lynch, because if it's the wrong lynch, it can all be sorted out. I have changed my mind on this. I have decided that I'm not just going to let myself be lynched, because it would be far better if we just lynched scum.