But this post:
Makes me really uneasy and I think he was trying to avoid voting his scum buddy.BlackWolf wrote:Vote : silence
If it approaches deadline, then I'll probably switch to Weilawei, second candidate for scum.
Makes me really uneasy and I think he was trying to avoid voting his scum buddy.BlackWolf wrote:Vote : silence
If it approaches deadline, then I'll probably switch to Weilawei, second candidate for scum.
I believed we should have talked more about that, the correct strategy was not completely analyzed (at least nobody posted any calculations). It need not have prohibited discussion about whether you (weilawei) are scum, it's not like the amount of posts is somehow restricted.Game and Watch Forever wrote:Second thing is. . . I believe I found a point where we left the cop/doc talk and move on to discussing whether my predecessor (and now me, I guess. . .) is scum or not.
I referred to my accusation from D1, explained during D1, in post 291:Game and Watch Forever wrote:he's sticking to thinking zu is most suspicious, but I'm unsure if he ever explained why.
silence wrote: Posts ~155-174: Nocmen puts Rickeon at L-1. BlackWolf states he won´t vote because it's L-1. Then zu_Faul switches his vote. On post 174 zu_Faul attacks three other people but not BlackWolf about 'possibly warning their partner about the L-1', when BlackWolf was the one who most obviously warned everyone about L-1. This makes any sense (except as a mistake) only if zu_Faul is scum with BlackWolf and therefore does not want to attack him. After BlackWolf's post the Rickeon bandwagon does not have much changes to cause a mishammer and thus zu_Faul switches his vote. FoS: zu_Faul, BlackWolf[/b]"
Am I the only one to think "I have reason to believe" is a pretty strange way to state something if one does not have a private reason? I was curious about this wording, especially as during D2 Nocmen used "I have reason" to state that there probably _is_ cop&doc (which I (naively,stupidly?) read as hinting that he is a powerrole and was surprised when he was not nightkilled). But the explanation he gave about gorillaman was satisfying to me, so no more about that.Game and Watch Forever wrote:oday, Nocmen says he doubts there's a cop/doc, which sounds like a pretty simple statement to me, but Silence questions it and there's some discussion over it. I just don't really see it as needed at this point. Is it really that necessary to delve further into that subject when we should be focused on finding the scum left among us?
This still does not make any sense to me. Why could not we have lynched him later? Only reason for that would have been that we had found an even better candidate. Why not let this happen?Nocmen wrote:As for why I voted so quickly Day 2... I feel that a lot of my post with the hammer explained it, but I suppose I can add more. It seemed that at that point, we had him cornered, and it was the perfect opportunity to take out someone who I thought was scum. If he wasn't scum, it wouldn't be game over right away. The only thing we had to lose was him as a townie, while if I waited we may not have had as good an opportunity to lynch and see if he really was town.
Had no specific reads about him. Probably town. And as you see from my D1-list, I considered him the least likely to be scum. N1 and D2 discussion didn't change my opinions much.Game and Watch Forever wrote:One more question to everyone this time: What was your opinion of gorillaman yesterday?
It just makes me uneasy. The problem with the idea though is that the doc would still be lynched, and I really think he wanted to have a clear target as who would be the Cop in this case.silence wrote:Maybe the cop should come out only after we have agreed who to lynch, and that person has not claimed doc.Nocmen wrote:The main problem that can happen, though, is if the doc is lynched today.
Me:zu_Faul wrote: 1. Atticus
2. Game and Watch / Weilawei
3. Nocmen
4. Silence
GnWF:Nocmen wrote: 1. Game and Watch Forever
2. silence
3. zu_faul
4. Atticus
silence:Game and Watch Forever wrote: So if you want my list:
1. Silence
2. Nocmen
3. zu_Faul
4. Atticus
Atticus:silence wrote:
1. Nocmen
2. zu_Faul
3. Atticus
4. Game and Watch Forever
4 Different people are beleived to be the most scummy. The only one that is a repeat is GnWF, which is top suspected by me and Atticus. The only one not suspected in spot one is ZF.Atticus wrote: GNFW
silence
zuFaul
Nocmen
Maybe you misunderstood somehow. The doc would not be lynched as obviously we would pick another target if the candidate claims doc. Also, this gives no 'clear target as who would be the Cop', because the cop doesn't claim if the doc has claimed (which was the point of the idea).Nocmen wrote:It just makes me uneasy. The problem with the idea though is that the doc would still be lynched, and I really think he wanted to have a clear target as who would be the Cop in this case.