Mafia 75: Return of the Mafia! TOWN WINS (really late)

[Battle Mage]

I go by the rule that when Jordan is away on holiday, and ABR has been left in charge, he probably needs a sharp prod in the bejesus.

BM

[Battle Mage]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]

Vote: Celebloki

[/quote]

[quote="Skitzer"]

Vote: Celebloki

[/quote]

are we seriously letting people get away with this???

BM

[Battle Mage]

BM, a meta + Peers' behavior on day 1. I have a game that shows Peers is capable and does act like a normal player as town, so his behavior this game is just as out of place as it would be for you or I.

NEGWLTWWTKY. Need i say more?

BM

[skitzer]

Isolated readthrough of ThugBehram/Peers/Celebloki (in the same fomat as TheSweatpantsNinja)

Post 4 (Peers): He says that his vote on Battle Mage was because of a meta. I personally don’t agree with metas.

Post 17 (Peers): He hops on the killa seven pressure-wagon, this may sound hypocritical but I learned not to employ pressure-wagons, usually, they are not worthwhile. But in this case, I guess it was.

Post 34 (Peers): Unexplained vote. These are always notable.

Post 0 (Celebloki): Thinks BM was protown. Of course, I’m not sure either, but I don’t think he was protown.

Post 3 (Celebloki): Still doesn’t agree that BM was bad.

Post 5 (Celebloki): Earlier, he suspected Matt_S. Now, after Matt_S attacks him, he seems to focus directly on his other suspect, WhoMe?. This is definitely strange.

Post 6 (Celebloki): Not to be bias, but I hardly doubt Celebloki has never been lynched in any mafia game.

In conclusion: If I were just to do a reread of Peers, I would classify him as neutral. But Celebloki’s Post 5 and 6, but mainly Post 5, have convinced me for now.

Vote: Celebloki

I think I’m going to do more readthroughs, because I’m sure there are better cases out there.

Plus the reasons of many others to agree with this.

Does that help, BM?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Yes BM

Amen

[Battle Mage]

Isolated readthrough of ThugBehram/Peers/Celebloki (in the same fomat as TheSweatpantsNinja)

Post 4 (Peers): He says that his vote on Battle Mage was because of a meta. I personally don’t agree with metas.

Post 17 (Peers): He hops on the killa seven pressure-wagon, this may sound hypocritical but I learned not to employ pressure-wagons, usually, they are not worthwhile. But in this case, I guess it was.

Post 34 (Peers): Unexplained vote. These are always notable.

Post 0 (Celebloki): Thinks BM was protown. Of course, I’m not sure either, but I don’t think he was protown.

Post 3 (Celebloki): Still doesn’t agree that BM was bad.

Post 5 (Celebloki): Earlier, he suspected Matt_S. Now, after Matt_S attacks him, he seems to focus directly on his other suspect, WhoMe?. This is definitely strange.

Post 6 (Celebloki): Not to be bias, but I hardly doubt Celebloki has never been lynched in any mafia game.

In conclusion: If I were just to do a reread of Peers, I would classify him as neutral. But Celebloki’s Post 5 and 6, but mainly Post 5, have convinced me for now.

Vote: Celebloki

I think I’m going to do more readthroughs, because I’m sure there are better cases out there.

Plus the reasons of many others to agree with this.

Does that help, BM?

I'll have a look at it in a sec. But it does put you above Scope in my mind.

BM

[Battle Mage]

Isolated readthrough of ThugBehram/Peers/Celebloki (in the same fomat as TheSweatpantsNinja)

Post 4 (Peers): He says that his vote on Battle Mage was because of a meta. I personally don’t agree with metas.

I'm not saying that Peers' meta of me had value, but firstly, its hard to reinforce that you 'dont agree with metas'. More importantly, why should your views on metas, which are used by 98% of people on MS at various times, be considered a scumtell from Peers?

Post 17 (Peers): He hops on the killa seven pressure-wagon, this may sound hypocritical but I learned not to employ pressure-wagons, usually, they are not worthwhile. But in this case, I guess it was.

So did i. I wasnt scum. Not buying it- this is the sort of stuff you should be discussing in MD.

Post 34 (Peers): Unexplained vote. These are always notable.

But in fairness, this is PEERS. What did you expect? He does this kind of thing all the time. The scummy thing if anything is that you only found 1 example of him not explaining himself properly!

Post 0 (Celebloki): Thinks BM was protown. Of course, I’m not sure either, but I don’t think he was protown.

sorry, you lost me.

Post 5 (Celebloki): Earlier, he suspected Matt_S. Now, after Matt_S attacks him, he seems to focus directly on his other suspect, WhoMe?. This is definitely strange.

That is a fair point. I'll look into it, along with post 6, which i guess i need to read to understand your comment

BM

[Matt_S]

Just to refresh everyone's memory, skitzer and Kscope are the ones who are protown. Of course, they still need to follow the same standards as everyone else.

And we still haven't gotten that vote count.

[armlx]

BM, Scope is Scope, Skitzer explained himself.

[Battle Mage]

BM, Scope is Scope, Skitzer explained himself.

I'm still looking at Skitzer's case. Rather than trying to defend everyone else, you might wanna take a look at your own case. Because as far as i can see, it's worthless.

BM

[Battle Mage]

Just to refresh everyone's memory, skitzer and Kscope are the ones who are protown. Of course, they still need to follow the same standards as everyone else.

And we still haven't gotten that vote count.

did you PM ABR?

[Battle Mage]

Ok Skitz i read post 5 by Celebloki, and erm, whilst he did name 2 suspects and chose to attack 1 of them moreso due to a greater town consensus, he did not, as you put it, "attack Matt" then change completely to Whome. No real attack on Matt occurred, apart from speculation about his role. Sorry, but that's not good enough for me.

BM

[armlx]

I'm still looking at Skitzer's case. Rather than trying to defend everyone else, you might wanna take a look at your own case. Because as far as i can see, it's worthless.

The case on me that you base on believing CKD?

[Battle Mage]

I'm still looking at Skitzer's case. Rather than trying to defend everyone else, you might wanna take a look at your own case. Because as far as i can see, it's worthless.

The case on me that you base on believing CKD?

eh? I'm not quite sure what you mean. I've yet to see a response to 3327.

BM

[armlx]

If I understood what it meant I could respond.

[Battle Mage]

If I understood what it meant I could respond.

*facepalm* you werent even in that game. I think of everyone here, only me and TS were. Well, i guess you should read Peers's play in that, and you'll see my point.

BM

[Surye]

This game has become so large, it's hard for me to fit it all in my head.

[armlx]

BM, skimmed his posts, not seeing it.

[Battle Mage]

BM, skimmed his posts, not seeing it.

Lol his play there and what you claim to be his scum meta are so identical, it's hilarious. Try reading them in context if you cant see that in isolation.

BM

[armlx]

Try reading them in context if you cant see that in isolation.

......

Can you at least explain a little? What I'm seeing there is an attempt at logic, and here just an attempt to wagon shamelessly.

[JordanA24]

Updated Vote Count, prodded all those who haven't posted today (including Celebloki). ABR says he's too busy to take over modding while I'm on holiday (August 1st-15th), I'll see if Gorrad can, if not, I'll ask the site in general.

andersonw is being replaced.

[Korlash]

I can do it

[JordanA24]

SpyreX replaces Andycyca
Tombolo replaces andersonw

[SpyreX]

Hey everyone. Teach me to offer to replace in before I check the game. I've got some reaaading to catch up on.

[killa seven]

welcome to hell spyrex.

lol, may not be far from the truth. Next game I run, I feel automatic deadlines will be in order, lol