armix wrote:Asking why someone chose that person is the real issue at hand here, especially with the ability for each person to pick either Lover A1, A2, B1, B2, etc.
Possibly we can look back and see if the suspicious person was trying to interact or avoid interaction with their other scum group through random voting or the claim order. It’s WIFOM now to think that the scum would/wouldn’t logically random vote the other scum pair or precede/follow them in the claim order, though.
Group 2 does look set apart from the rest but you can also argue that 1 and 6 distanced if you don't count 6 asking 1 to claim after the fact. 3,4, and 5 And if you want to look only at voting, then 3 and 4 kept apart while 4 and 5 kept apart.
1 = Zoolander / The Pope’s Tiara
2 = Jebus / 3fj
3 = Armix / kloud1516
4 = Goatrevolt / Llamafluff
5 = OpposedForce / Jahudo
6 = Caboose / Farside22
--------------
Random voting tally
1A votes 3A and 5B. 1B votes 2B
Group one interacts with 2,3, and 5. Meanwhile groups 3,4, and 5 interact with them and 1 asked them to claim (didn’t see the initial claim?). 6 does not interact depending on how you read it.
2A votes 3B and 2B votes 3B
Group two interacts with only 3. Meanwhile groups 1 and 4 interact with them. 2,5, and 6 do not interact.
3A votes 5A and 1B. 3B votes 1A
Group three interacts with 1,5 and asked 4 to claim. Meanwhile groups 1,2, and 6 interact with them. All interact.
4A votes 1A and 4B votes 2A
Group four interacts with 1,2 and asked 5 to claim. Meanwhile group 6 interacts with them and 3 asked them to claim. All interact.
5A votes 6A. 5B votes 1A and 2A
Group five interacts with 1,2, and 6 and asked 6 to claim. Meanwhile 1 and 3 interact with them and 4 asked them to claim. All interact.
6A votes 4A and 6B votes 3A
Group six interacts with 3,4 and asks 1 to claim (didn’t see the initial claim?). Meanwhile 5 interacts with them and asked them to claim. 2 does not interact (and 1 depending on how you read it).
-------------
Mass lover claim order
1A claims
2A claims
3A claims and asks 4A to claim
4A claims and asks 5A to claim
5A claims and asks 6A to claim
6A claims and asks 1B to claim (didn’t see the initial claim?)
-------------
No judgment yet, but maybe a reference point for later.