Caboose wrote:Jahudo wrote:I don't know if paraphrased chats should factor in much or at all, but it does sound like two typical newbies to me.
Newbie town or scum?
I think that townies would be more worried about finding scum than avoiding suspicion themselves.
Or is that just me?
QFT. I would also like to know what you, Jahudo, meant in the comment above. Were you referring to newbie town or scum? You might have already answered this, and if so I have missed it, so could you either respond/answer again please?
Jahudo wrote:Adel wrote:
I kind of suspect that thier understanding of the setup was so incompleat that they (both of them) thought that as lovers they needed to avoid being suspected of being lovers.
Caboose wrote:That doesn't add up to me.
I said earlier the chat made them sound like newbies, but Jebus looks anti-town trying to be pro-town and 3jf looks anti-town trying to be
anti-town
with what he's suggesting.
The chat shouldn't prove what they are, but if 3jf is replaced their ideas shouldn't count against the replacements, right?
Do you mean that 3fj looks anti-town trying to be pro-town here? Just thought I should ask for clarity.
Jahudo wrote:Goatrevolt wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what you're suggesting, but if someone replaces out, their replacement does not get a fresh start or a clean slate.
No not completely.
I just mean that Jebus' random vote idea and 3jf's inactivity are not strong enough tells to lynch their replacements. I can feel neutral on this group at this stage.
Even if they feel like a good instinct vote, it's not well reasoned.
1) I agree with Goat here; My own opinion of Adel in regards to replacing Jebus can be found in post 139. I still feel this way, and have not seen any reasons that indicate my suspicions of Jebus/Adel should deteriorate.
2) I feel as though you are contradicting yourself here, Jahudo, for you claim that the random vote idea and 3fj's inactivity are not strong enough to be tells, yet your vote is on 3fj due to said inactivity. This isn't adding up to me. You then go on to say that you feel neutral on this group at this stage, and if this is the case, then why is your vote still on 3fj?
FoS: Jahudo
I feel as though you have continued to flip flop on your opinions. First you suggest that because Jebus defended the random lynch proposal that he/she was pro-town/not worthy of the criticism and suspicion being given, and now you are claiming that both Jebus and 3fj are/were pro-town trying to appear anti-town. You seem to be trying to maintain a position in neutral grounds, and I am not liking it.
This being said, I have not found anything that OF has done/said to particularly stand out, so this detracts slightly from the thought of the Jahudo/OF pair being scum. For now, that is.