Sorry, I forgot that you made the attack. Next time I'll be sure to ignore youKorlash wrote:Oh oh what? what? Are people paying attnetion to attacks I pressed now? What? Oh wow that's new.Matt wrote:Your comment on the doc yesterday.
Could you explain this part plz?curiouskarmadog wrote:TS is obvscum..interesting how so many says so now but attacked me earlier.
I echo this sentiment.Korlash wrote:;_; Jerk mafia... Free me from this hell hole!!!!!
*sigh*
I forget... what were we doing again?
I don't believe I have made use of logic even once in this game, what are you talking about?skitzer wrote:I don't like the TS logic in this game.
... and now that I have reread some games where Incog was scum (especially Nubigena), I am reexamining my initial conclusions. Incog doesn't vary that much between town and scum - the main differences are that his scum posts tend to be a little shorter, and he appears to be less prone to attacking and somewhat more willing to discuss theory [IIoA] as scum). As such, his play here (short posts, no attacks) is a null tell at best and scummy at worst.Tarhalindur wrote:... I'll need to look over some games where Incog has been scum to be sure...
There are actually two important questions to ask: is there a second scum faction, and does the Mafia think there is a second scum faction? Even if only the latter applies, Selective Scumhunting may be applicable.SpyreX wrote:I'd love more explanation from this. Here's a few questions to start the pot a brewin:tar wrote:SpyreX needs a closer look (I didn't reread him as closely as I could have) - Andycyca was unusually contentless before he got replaced, and on first glance his play yesterday seems consistent with scum hunting rival scum.
1.) Do we have proof of rival scum factions or is this just conjecture?
The difference isn't so much how scum hunt scum so much as it is WHO they hunt - if a player in a multiple scum faction game is hunting for all scum except for one specific group, it's fairly likely that said player is a member of the group they ignore. (It's a useful enough tell for me that I have a shorthand to refer to it - Selective Scumhunting.)2.) How would scum hunting rival scum be different than town hunting scum? (since you imply a definite difference there).
Because I only took the time to look at your predecessor overnight?3.) Why is it today, versus all of yesterday, that you bring this up?
Go on, FoS me. You know you want to.I'd give you an FoS, but really, whats the point.
Fair enough. With the Recruiter dead when he was and the SK dead (and the fact we haven't seen non-vig claimed kills) I haven't been thinking about a cult (I assumed with recruiter dead the cult couldn't recruit, so).1) There definitely WAS a Cult and there definitely WAS a Serial Killer, so the Selective Scumhunting tell should apply (for D1 at the very least, with a longer-lasting effect if the Mafia thinks there are surviving Cultists.
Agreed, but again this is in reference to me so I'm not seeing how its applicable.The difference isn't so much how scum hunt scum so much as it is WHO they hunt - if a player in a multiple scum faction game is hunting for all scum except for one specific group, it's fairly likely that said player is a member of the group they ignore. (It's a useful enough tell for me that I have a shorthand to refer to it - Selective Scumhunting.)
1.) Fair enough.Because I only took the time to look at your predecessor overnight?
Because we actually caught a scum yesterday and I finally have something to work with?
Because I'm finally starting to get interested in this game again?
Actually, now, I dont. You are right that the possible existence of a Cult could cause some of the above. I'm still not sure how -I- fall into this but I know you'll explain.Go on, FoS me. You know you want to.
Wrong costume.DrippingGoofball wrote:CKD you officially killed the game with that comment.
I think I understand the disconnect here - you seem to be operating under the assumption that I am saying that you've been committing some of these tells, while I was under the assumption that you were asking me to explain my general reasoning. (As a matter of fact, there was a reason why you couldn't understand why some of my statements would be a reference to you - namely, that theySpyreX wrote:Fair enough. With the Recruiter dead when he was and the SK dead (and the fact we haven't seen non-vig claimed kills) I haven't been thinking about a cult (I assumed with recruiter dead the cult couldn't recruit, so).1) There definitely WAS a Cult and there definitely WAS a Serial Killer, so the Selective Scumhunting tell should apply (for D1 at the very least, with a longer-lasting effect if the Mafia thinks there are surviving Cultists.
However, in my instance, I could see calling me out for tunnel vision but, really I've been about as Selective as you can get, just kill TScum and we will go from there.
Agreed, but again this is in reference to me so I'm not seeing how its applicable.The difference isn't so much how scum hunt scum so much as it is WHO they hunt - if a player in a multiple scum faction game is hunting for all scum except for one specific group, it's fairly likely that said player is a member of the group they ignore. (It's a useful enough tell for me that I have a shorthand to refer to it - Selective Scumhunting.)
1.) Fair enough.Because I only took the time to look at your predecessor overnight?
Because we actually caught a scum yesterday and I finally have something to work with?
Because I'm finally starting to get interested in this game again?
2.) Borge being scum gives something to work with on me?
3.) I understand 350%.
Actually, now, I dont. You are right that the possible existence of a Cult could cause some of the above. I'm still not sure how -I- fall into this but I know you'll explain.Go on, FoS me. You know you want to.
Now, that makes sense. Yes, I thought the whole mess was applying to me and i was confused - now that I understand I definitely agree with you on most of it. A few questions though:I think I understand the disconnect here - you seem to be operating under the assumption that I am saying that you've been committing some of these tells, while I was under the assumption that you were asking me to explain my general reasoning. (As a matter of fact, there was a reason why you couldn't understand why some of my statements would be a reference to you - namely, that they weren't a reference to you.)
Are you actually cleared or is this the "I know my alignment" conjecture? (I've honestly lost track of some things this game so this is just a question).Five of these players' identities are known (farside, MattS, Skitzer, KScope, and myself).
Agreed.I'm pretty sure at this point that TS, BM, and killa7 are all scum (either 1 Cult, 2 Mafia or 3 Mafia)
Why CKD town? He's been scummy and I wouldn't put a bus past him (or different scum group).I'm now pretty sure that CKD is town, and I'm going to assume that Tombolo is town for now (he read town when I looked over him, and even if he is scum he's not an immediate threat).
Only one mistake. It should be claim AND die.That's lynch-2. Toaster Strudel, claim or die.
HA HA HA HA HA.... Sorry you'll laugh later...Farside wrote:What about Korlash. His actions aren't exactly on the up and up.
Right well like I said ages ago, go for it. I'm an open book... A book with a lot of pictures... and at least one pop-up! Maybe of a boat...Spy wrote:Scummy. Not as much to go on as TS.
TS first, FTW.
I do like grouping us together. The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.Why are Surye and Spyrex still alive? Never have I seen such blatantly manipulative scumbags.
I really must thank Toaster Strudel for claiming Mafia.Toaster Strudel wrote:Korlash - it looks like we're about to part ways...
Why are Surye and Spyrex still alive? Never have I seen such blatantly manipulative scumbags.
That would be the latter option.SpyreX wrote:Now, that makes sense. Yes, I thought the whole mess was applying to me and i was confused - now that I understand I definitely agree with you on most of it. A few questions though:I think I understand the disconnect here - you seem to be operating under the assumption that I am saying that you've been committing some of these tells, while I was under the assumption that you were asking me to explain my general reasoning. (As a matter of fact, there was a reason why you couldn't understand why some of my statements would be a reference to you - namely, that they weren't a reference to you.)Are you actually cleared or is this the "I know my alignment" conjecture? (I've honestly lost track of some things this game so this is just a question).Five of these players' identities are known (farside, MattS, Skitzer, KScope, and myself).
CKD has never been replaced. I will not go into detail about how this is important at this time.Agreed.I'm pretty sure at this point that TS, BM, and killa7 are all scum (either 1 Cult, 2 Mafia or 3 Mafia)Why CKD town? He's been scummy and I wouldn't put a bus past him (or different scum group).I'm now pretty sure that CKD is town, and I'm going to assume that Tombolo is town for now (he read town when I looked over him, and even if he is scum he's not an immediate threat).
Also, I honestly forgot about Tombolo - again, why town?
I only ask because I'd say Suyre has a more "town" vibe than either of the above. I do agree about Korlash though. Of course, I dont agree about myself but.
Well, considering what she claimed I have to agree!Only one mistake. It should be claim AND die.That's lynch-2. Toaster Strudel, claim or die.
