You’re dodging a question again.populartajo wrote:Why dont you ask all here?Falcone wrote:Who said no information could be gained from Ergo's lynch?
Pay attention please. I never said there were three scum (although that's par for the course for a Mini Game). I'm just referring to the fact I have made cases against three people today (Grimmy, populartajo and Battousai) and that it would be hilarious if all three were scum.populartajo wrote:WAIT. Where did you get that there were 3 scum?Falcone wrote:Partly, yes, but only because it would be slightly ridiculous for me to have caught three scum on Day 1.
If you're lynched for refusing to answer a legitimate question, then it will be your problem, not mine.populartajo wrote:Im not dodging any question. If my answer doesnt satisfy you for w/e reasons then its your problem, not mine.Falcone wrote:Of course it has. But I honestly think that you make life difficult for yourself by not answering a straightforward question. It would have been much better just to admit that you didn’t have a good reason, or at least not a fully thought through reasoning, when you called for Ergo’s lynch. Dodging questions is a scum tell, and the more you do it, the more you make me think you’re scum.
Please show me where fuzzylightning agreed with your case. Or rather, spare yourself the effort, fuzzylightning has few enough posts that anyone can see he never did agree with any case you have made against Timeater / Erg0. The point is not that a couple of people (including you) voted for Timeater right before and right after he asked to be replaced, the point is that you tried to revive the bandwagon several pages later and that you still haven’t answered my questions about your reasons for doing that.populartajo wrote:Oh yes there was a case against Timeater. Why havent you jumped against other players like Muerrto and Fuzzy Lightning that agreed with my case?Falcone wrote:I wasn’t aware there was a case against Erg0. If you’re still talking about the fact that Timeater asked for a replacement when there were a couple of votes for him and then kept responding until he was replaced, then yes, I think it’s a bad case.
No, I’m not. What do you hope to achieve by asking me that?populartajo wrote:Falcone, are you scum?
Do you mean Muerrto’s #196? Is there anything especially noteworthy about that post? I certainly can’t blame Muerrto for voting you, if that’s what you mean.populartajo wrote:Why did you ignore Muerrto's post?
See above. Please refer to one single post in which someone agrees with you wanting to lynch Erg0 becausepopulartajo wrote: If you think Timeater's was a bad case, why have you ignored others agreement to it?
You are misrepresenting my reasons for attacking you.