feels like aimless semanticsIn post 224, Wisdom wrote:How did you "catch" him if hes not scum for it
i didn't do it to catch scum but to attempt to provide a major discussion point
thread consensus should be that hockey is town
feels like aimless semanticsIn post 224, Wisdom wrote:How did you "catch" him if hes not scum for it
I have no quallers with this scumcase, dont really agree with the read itself but i think scumcase is pretty good. 1 thing tho. Can you expand on what you mean by "informed"? Also I tr Aristeria mainly because of tone? Idfk again, Its not a very concrete read but posts like 104, 127 and 174 make me feel better about Ari
Cyclone 2.0(this is for cows only)In post 160, redtea wrote:cows and ari are scumbuddies. i've solved it, no need to thank me, but I do take tips
I said it seemed odd because i intrepeted wisdom's post as "why are you sussing cows", when that vote wasnt even meant to be a serious vote and was my first post of the game, so wisdom reaching that conclusion was super ??In post 192, redtea wrote:Hockey #52
I don't know if I'd tl him for that, because while it's maybe in mafia's best interest to keep lover pairings a secret, if claims tend to happen early anyway, and he's played this setup a couple times, then scum might as well try for town cred. So that in itself isn't AI to me.
BUT his follow-ups with people, especially Ari, about the topic, have me tl'ing him, now that I'm properly reading all this.
Seeing that as "defending" cows is weird to me but w/e.
Also think Cow is sus as hell, not sure exactly what he's playing at irt Dunn.
And this post and the follow-ups is the weird gut read on bunny I was talking about like what
Hockey #42
Tell me why it seems odd? Because your post doesn't look like it actually means anything.
well yes, but that has nothing to do with the post you quotedIn post 208, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey town?In post 207, bnuuy wrote:i feel like im being punished for actively trying to have a hand in the outcome of this game and its making me want to sink back into being low impact
no cheating allowed redtea!In post 227, HockeyFan wrote:Cyclone 2.0(this is for cows only)
pro-hockey advocates always have a hand in town's directionIn post 228, bnuuy wrote:well yes, but that has nothing to do with the post you quoted
thats the entire pointIn post 212, redtea wrote:people were sr'ing you for being low impact don't do thatIn post 207, bnuuy wrote:i feel like im being punished for actively trying to have a hand in the outcome of this game and its making me want to sink back into being low impact
/not a scum slip
youre a fine playerIn post 217, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:slightly unrelated note but if one more person IIT calls my play shit i'm going to start sulkingIn post 193, redtea wrote:Dunnstal was mentioned a lot, sure, but in the context of Ari defending her words. Except for the posts made by cow, which kind of took Ari's interactions with Wisdom and ran a marathon with it for some reason.
what does this meanIn post 230, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:pro-hockey advocates always have a hand in town's direction
tongue in cheek comment about you voicing your desire to make an impact on the gameIn post 233, bnuuy wrote:what does this meanIn post 230, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:pro-hockey advocates always have a hand in town's direction
Depends on how mech-savvy scum thinks town is doesn't it?In post 221, Aristeia wrote:in an open setup, optimal mech play is usually common knowledge so there is no incentive for scum players to lie about what the optimal mech play is.In post 210, redtea wrote:that makes. No sense. At all. "Optimal mech play" is usually entirely different depending on your alignment. Literally what are you talking about.
Optimal mech play is not dependent upon alignment because it would be stupid for scum to present a suboptimal mech play in hopes of fooling the town.
V OTECOUNT 1.007 | |
P LAYER N AME | C URRENT V OTES |
HockeyFan (0) | None |
Not_Mafia (1) | Not_Mafia |
cowsloveSushirolls (0) | None |
Aristeia (0) | None |
Wisdom (0) | None |
bnuuy (1) | Wisdom |
redtea (2) | HockeyFan, bnuuy |
Dunnstral (0) | None |
NOT VOTING: | |
With 8 alive, it takes 5 to eliminate. Deadline: (expired on 2021-09-21 10:30:00) | |
Notes: pagetop count: Wisdom 3 | redtea 2 | Hockeyfan 1 | bnuuy 1 | lilith 1 | cows 1 |
id like something more than platitudesIn post 234, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:tongue in cheek comment about you voicing your desire to make an impact on the gameIn post 233, bnuuy wrote:what does this meanIn post 230, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:pro-hockey advocates always have a hand in town's direction
i'll have to see if i can fit that into my scheduleIn post 237, bnuuy wrote:id like something more than platitudes
If you agree with redtea's SR, why are they in null for u?In post 238, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:i'll have to see if i can fit that into my scheduleIn post 237, bnuuy wrote:id like something more than platitudes
readslist time?
hockey
bnuuy
--blob of unreasonable (but ordered) nullness. my scumpartner is here
redtea
dunn
wisdom
NM
--
ari(and for different reasons than redtea oh god i am g aming)
?In post 239, bnuuy wrote:why doesnt ari reinforce my negative view on redtea in the pt then?
i think simply agreeing with people's content is an easy trap to fall into when trying to find townIn post 241, HockeyFan wrote:If you agree with redtea's SR, why are they in null for u?
In post 244, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:i think simply agreeing with people's content is an easy trap to fall into when trying to find townIn post 241, HockeyFan wrote:If you agree with redtea's SR, why are they in null for u?
but you and i
we MINDMELDED
In post 239, bnuuy wrote:why doesnt ari reinforce my negative view on redtea in the pt then?
you're asking why ari didn't buddy you instead of scumreading you alongside redtea?In post 243, bnuuy wrote:like, wisdom, the lower half of that pair, is still above 2 people for you, that would mean that ari gave up a chance to use me to strengthen the push she was making against redtea and instead argued the opposite read when that pair seems to be town/town to you. why does scum!ari reject such an opportunity?
is it mechanical talk, automatically disqualifying it from being a genuine mindmeld? yesIn post 191, redtea wrote:cowslove #44
This is only really a strat for as long as lover pairs aren't claimed, and your partner atp already suggested everyone claim.
(Of course now we have all the pairs).
And since all the pairs getting claimed was only a matter of time, why would you out this potential strat, ensuring scum wouldn't fall into it?
I guess I don't want to be too harsh here because I hit close to pushing "send" on posts like these myself, but usually I stop to think "wait maybe saying that isn't a good idea," you know?
Weirdly, Hockey says the same thing here. There may or may not be an implication it's too late to do so as that cat's already out of the bag, I can't tell.
again, i feel iffy basing reads on only content but that has been what i'm doing w red, which is why they're north of nullIn post 245, HockeyFan wrote:To your first point, fair. But imo you should have some definitive read on him, wheter it be TL, SL, SR, TR e.t.c if you agree with thier content
youre missing the trajectory of my thought process. ari didnt attempt to buddy me, nor did she continue pushing me and redtea, instead she chose to reverse course on redtea. the only way that play makes sense as scum is if shes partners with someone in that pair, but you dont seem to believe that so why is ari scum when her logical partners arent your primary suspects?In post 246, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:In post 239, bnuuy wrote:why doesnt ari reinforce my negative view on redtea in the pt then?you're asking why ari didn't buddy you instead of scumreading you alongside redtea?In post 243, bnuuy wrote:like, wisdom, the lower half of that pair, is still above 2 people for you, that would mean that ari gave up a chance to use me to strengthen the push she was making against redtea and instead argued the opposite read when that pair seems to be town/town to you. why does scum!ari reject such an opportunity?
none of our lovers have attempted to buddy the other. why be the first? clearly none of the mafia are taking the angle of appealing to their partner in particular. i think it could be easy as "they're blending in"