I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
I townread Alianna.
Post #1000s Collected: 25
Mini Normal 2337 is in signups with 8/13 slots remaining!
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
sus
VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Actually no nvm the timing on that would imply that monkey is sk since it was too close together to have read through the entire role list so if our angleshooting is correct they looked up parts of their role. If they were groupscum that would have probably popped up earlier
rn don't really care about sk that much
VOTE: Invis post
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 119, usesPython wrote:
Like all of biancos town!heip theories are like alternate explanation stuff that'd come to mind if you start from the position that heip is town and then run the mindset from there
Lol. I'd like to hear what those "theories" of mine might be.
Beside just not accepting that heip's tmi'ing
which, yknow, the onus is really on you on that as far as I'm concerned, you are the one with the claim
That's the entire reason we're calling you scum here:
The town perspective:
I don't know heip's alignment
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
therefore it's reasonable to assume heip thinks his wagon is pure
therefore the people pushing him could be town
The scum perspective:
I know heip is town
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
therefore I can counterwagon the people pushing him for towncred
are you having trouble with?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 155, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
you look almost town except i couldn't quite agree with a lot of your reads, so you could be just very good scum! what's your mafia experience
like a bunch of town games, 2 newbie games were we replaced in as scum (1 win/1 loss), and 1 multiball scum game where we replaced out d1
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 158, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
comprehension. can you explain it in some other way? you voted him on #106 so I'm mainly interested in what inspired the vote
The 106 vote was like 50% just gut telling us "somethings up", it's only after 113 that it really became a solidified scumread
Basically we think there's a difference between "No you're wrong" and "No you're wrong + vote" in 101 since while the first implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure but can see how town could come to that conclusion
the second implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure and doesn't see how town could come to that conclusion
which doesn't seem like a real thought town has and instead seems better explained with the informed mindset of
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
In post 158, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
comprehension. can you explain it in some other way? you voted him on #106 so I'm mainly interested in what inspired the vote
The 106 vote was like 50% just gut telling us "somethings up", it's only after 113 that it really became a solidified scumread
Basically we think there's a difference between "No you're wrong" and "No you're wrong + vote" in 101 since while the first implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure but can see how town could come to that conclusion
the second implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure and doesn't see how town could come to that conclusion
which doesn't seem like a real thought town has and instead seems better explained with the informed mindset of
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
sus
VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
In post 153, usesPython wrote:
Actually no nvm the timing on that would imply that monkey is sk since it was too close together to have read through the entire role list so if our angleshooting is correct they looked up parts of their role. If they were groupscum that would have probably popped up earlier
rn don't really care about sk that much
VOTE: Invis post
Like this is just a trash argument thou. Borderline only works if we think our mod royally screwed up
I'm going to boldly assume there's no way Alianna posts that announcment, linking to a specific role post in the NIM thread, in rensponse to a player with that role asking questions, and especially not such a player like HEM that would already be in the spotlight for being replaced. Like, no way she's going to modspew stuff that hard
In post 162, biancospino wrote:
Like this is just a trash argument thou. Borderline only works if we think our mod royally screwed up
I'm going to boldly assume there's no way Alianna posts that announcment, linking to a specific role post in the NIM thread, in rensponse to a player with that role asking questions, and especially not such a player like HEM that would already be in the spotlight for being replaced. Like, no way she's going to modspew stuff that hard
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
Emphasis ours. We're not saying HEM is exactly
Serial Killer Rolecop 3-Shot Commuter
, we're saying that if our angleshooting is correct and HEM is scum they can Rolecop or Commute and that it doesn't make sense for them to be groupscum since that would have come up earlier when Merlyn was looking up her role
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
, we're saying that if our angleshooting is correct and HEM is scum they can Rolecop or Commute and that it doesn't make sense for them to be groupscum since that would have come up earlier when Merlyn was looking up her role
Eh, ok I guess, whatever. Still don't like to try to guess thing out of what would still be a mod fuck up. I think you have the emphasis one the wrong thing thou I guess you wanted to emphasize "part of" in 153 idk
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
sus
VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
In post 153, usesPython wrote:
Actually no nvm the timing on that would imply that monkey is sk since it was too close together to have read through the entire role list so if our angleshooting is correct they looked up parts of their role. If they were groupscum that would have probably popped up earlier
rn don't really care about sk that much
VOTE: Invis post
Like this is just a trash argument thou. Borderline only works if we think our mod royally screwed up
I'm going to boldly assume there's no way Alianna posts that announcment, linking to a specific role post in the NIM thread, in rensponse to a player with that role asking questions, and especially not such a player like HEM that would already be in the spotlight for being replaced. Like, no way she's going to modspew stuff that hard
this is probably a fair assertion in a vacuum but like it feels like tunneling here. It feels weirdly combatative (how do you spell that word)* but I think it's coming from a mindset of finding the evil boogeymonster and trying to find every opportunity to take them down
*so I've just discovered it's combative. Like it's three syllables. What. Did everyone else know this
I feel like bianco probably flips scum here and that her flipping scum just straight up clears the heip slot
Yes, we know, you said that yesterday already
We should say that tomorrow too
I always love a good Bianco wagon
VOTE: Bianco
'dREW DID IT BETTER' - T-Bone
'actually ya drew is useless' - Snivy
'I love playing with him, he's got an amazing presence to him that just feels like the game is lacking something when he's not there' - JacksonVirgo
I guess you wanted to emphasize "part of" in 153 idk
