Mini 715: Legends of Literature Mafia (Over)

[SlySly]

/confirm

[SlySly]

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

This implies that you have no knowledge of scum tactics. According to your signature, you have been scum enough times to have that inside knowledge.

vote:rolfcopter

[SlySly]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

[SlySly]

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

Oh, yeah, and nice attempt at faking a PR.

What is a PR?

[SlySly]

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

He's saying that CC looks like he has inside knowledge of

this

game's scum mechanics.

Where does he specify this game? I think that is an assumption on your part. I was not defending CC, maybe you are trying to defend rofl.

FOS:Caboose

rolfcopter, you are right, I should have said mechanics.

[SlySly]

PR = Post restriction, your "Bah! Humbug!"

ROFLMFAO @ You and your assumptions. Does it really look like I have a post restriction or that I am trying to act like I do? If you think the meaning of my "Bah! Humbug!" post was to fake a post restriction, go right on with your bad self assuming something that is TOTALLY inaccurate.

So you FoS me because I can read? LoL. It was pretty clear what rofl meant in his post.

In other words, you can't point out where he specified "this" game.

[SlySly]

So, you're already character claiming?

Can you post without making an assumption?

Did rofl really need to sit and type out "it seems like he knows the scum mechanics in this game at this point in time right here right now" to make himself clear?

I find it hilarious that you have to paraphrase to make your point. That just proves mine.

[SlySly]

Can you post without making an assumption?

SS, you can't read anybody's posts literally in mafia, you have to make inferences ("assumptions" as you like to call them).

Thank you for enlightening me, I have never played before.

Are you not attacking me for what you consider an assumption of mine after you yourself have already done plenty of assuming

in this game

?

Why did you make this post?

Oh yeah. Bah! Humbug!

Are you telling me that you don't have a 3rd assumption for my reasoning there?

I made that post to express my xmas spirit in response to Riceball's avatar and Christmas-y post. I was gonna vote Rice but Carn had already beat me to the reasoning.

I find it hilarious that you have to paraphrase to make your point. That just proves mine.

*sigh*
What is your "case" on rofl if that isn't it?
I don't think it exists.

You do realize that was my first post in the game don't you?

My vote is a random vote. I just stated it in a way that would help keep the random stage short, might put a little pressure on rofl, and help geting the interrogations underway. Just look how successful I was. It sure seems that my random vote got under your skin more than the person I put the vote on and got your assumption train rolling. That I will take note of.

[SlySly]

This implies that you have no knowledge of scum tactics. According to your signature, you have been scum enough times to have that inside knowledge.

In response to the idiotic Chainsaw defense accusation of me from the over assuming Caboose, can anyone, including Caboose, show me in the quote above where I, in any way, defended CC?

unvote:roflcopter

vote:Caboose

[SlySly]

You never actually address the person you're defending.

Virtualization / (assuming things that aren't there) seem to be the basis of everything you discuss.

------------------------------

I think it's OMGUS.

Another assumption. Hard to believe it took you so long.

------------------------------

You accuse me of pulling "reasons out of (my) rear end" while you reach for the stars trying to pull a chainsaw defense from the sky?

I notice you didn't exactly address rofl, so would the following be an example of a chainsaw defense?

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

He's saying that CC looks like he has inside knowledge of

this

game's scum mechanics.

I didn't know what a chainsaw defense was before you told me. My statement was not a defense of CC, but you bringing up the chainsaw defense makes the quote above seem like an example of what you are trying to paint me with.

------------------------------

You state something you can't prove and then paraphrase to "attempt" to prove it instead of just admitting you were wrong.

------------------------------

You scumminess is what has earned my vote. You are either scum or VI. Time will tell.

[SlySly]

I'm not buying this "I baited a trap" BS. Is anyone else?

Nope, not buying it one bit.

unvote - vote: Sly

baited trap? hardly!

What do you think about Caboose's opinion that my post 26 was a chainsaw defense of CC?
What do you think about Caboose's opinion that my "Bah! Humbug!" post was an attempted PR fake?
What do you think about Caboose's stating that a quote was fact and paraphrased in his response to fill in the missing piece because what he was stating as fact was not a part of the quote when I questioned him about it?
Do you think Caboose is showing a pattern of grasping for straws to make mountains out of molehills?

-----------------------------------------------

I don't think the mass flavor claim would do us any good right now. It's so broad and the fake claim options are endless... the only way it would work out is if we were all characters from the same book.

I had not even thought of the possibility that we were all from the same book. I assumed, which is generally pretty stupid, that we would all be from different books.

mod: Can you confirm whether we are all from the same book or not?

[SlySly]

ps vaquero is obv sly's scumpartner

Why? Because he has a brain and isn't grasping for straws?

[SlySly]

I agree with vaq in that I would also like this discussion to not dominate the entire day, putting us at square one tomorrow when we end up hitting a townie.

OMFG!!!!

Riceball, you are obviously chainsaw defending me. I can tell you trying your best to get me to pull a Fong. With you are saying "square one" and "hitting a townie" it is painfully obvious that you are in the midst of a BBB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chainsaw Defense
From MafiaWiki

The defensive tactic of claiming a role which investigates as guilty to respond to a guilty investigation without attacking the investigator.

Caboose, when I was executing my chainsaw defense of CC, which role did I claim and who was it that was questioning me about the guilty investigation they had on me?

It becomes clear that we should all take Caboose's word as gospel because his chainsaw defense definition was right on!!!

[SlySly]

Chainsaw defense = defending someone by attacking that person's attacker. Usually the chainsaw defender uses invalid reasons in his/her vote.

In case anyone missed it.

[SlySly]

I've heard caboose's definition used as the chainsaw defense elsewhere.

It doesn't really matter either way since my statement was not a chainsaw defense. It takes an extreme reach to think it was.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Caboose, I did not claim Scrooge. That is just another hair brained stretch of yours to make something out of nothing. You do realize how close Christmas is, don't you?

Referencing ongoing games on top of your idiotic reaches of scuminess? VI is quickly becoming a bigger possibility in your case.

[SlySly]

I don't really understand what you're asking here.

I am referring to this...

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

He's saying that CC looks like he has inside knowledge of

this

game's scum mechanics.

Where does he specify this game?

So you FoS me because I can read? LoL. It was pretty clear what rofl meant in his post.

In other words, you can't point out where he specified "this" game.

Did rofl really need to sit and type out "it seems like he knows the scum mechanics in this game at this point in time right here right now" to make himself clear?

He had to paraphrase, because he knows what he is claiming as fact is not actually there in the statement in question. Do you not agree?

[SlySly]

I'd love to vote sly, but I can't yet tell if this is his usual style of play.

I do get mislynched D1 a lot. I think it is my charming personality.

The last time I played with him, he pretty much single-handedly drove two players to replace out, one being TSQ.

Yep, that game TSQ was the IC and flipped his lid and quit instead of trying to help the noobs learn the game. Then Ythill replaced him and did the exact same thing after I pointed out the obvious about his some of his actions. That is the game where my signature came from.

[SlySly]

Dude, you are attacking Caboose to an almost ridiculous level at this point.

He attacked me because he claimed I was chainsaw defending CC, do you believe that I was chainsaw defending CC?

[SlySly]

This worries me. I don't know if it was meant to be sarcastic.

Thank you for enlightening me, I have never played before.

It is sarcasm. I have played many games.

[SlySly]

...moving your vote derailed all momentum on the slysly wagon, effectively stalling the game...

The game doesn't have to stall just because focus is shifted. Maybe we can find something real now instead of just having Caboose throw darts until he hits something that everyone deems worthy of consideration, like he did attempting to build a case against me.

[SlySly]

This game seems to be treading in lurky waters.

[SlySly]

...I'm just worried SlySly is too close to a lynch...

...Why are you worried that Sly is "too close to a lynch," and what gives/gave you the impression that he is close to being lynched?

I was wondering that myself.

[SlySly]

Nothing you've said has changed my mind about you.

I already assumed that. Your mind seems to have been made up about me on my very first post. I doubt anything anyone says will change your mind, as you seem hellbent on justifying your stretches.

[SlySly]

Sly ties with his crappy defense and a crappier attack on CC

First Caboose says I am defending CC, not Tenchi says I am attacking CC. Tenchi please point out where I attacked CC.

[SlySly]

EBWOP:

...now Tenchi says...

[SlySly]

OK, I reread and Caboose started it with the "pulling stuff out of your rear end" comment. But I have to say he had a point.

So, are you saying that you agree that I didn't attack CC?

Would you not agree that Caboose has been pulling plenty out of his own "rear end"?

[SlySly]

No, I base my case off of what's on the page, not a misrepresentation of it.

Oh? Is that why you paraphrased to prove what you claim is fact where the origin was lacking content to sustain your point?

[SlySly]

Where's this "paraphrasing" that you're talking about?

I am referring to this...

that implies some sort of inside knowledge about scum mechanics

He's saying that CC looks like he has inside knowledge of

this

game's scum mechanics.

Where does he specify this game?

So you FoS me because I can read? LoL. It was pretty clear what rofl meant in his post.

In other words, you can't point out where he specified "this" game.

Did rofl really need to sit and type out "it seems like he knows the scum mechanics in this game at this point in time right here right now" to make himself clear?

He had to paraphrase, because he knows what he is claiming as fact is not actually there in the statement in question.

You know rolf did not specify this game in that post which is why you had to paraphrase which goes against you going with what is on the paper.

[SlySly]

I agree that you attacked CC

Please quote my attack on CC.

If I am attacking CC so hard, why is my vote on Caboose?

[SlySly]

1. You attacked Caboose not CC.

This clears up my misunderstanding. I was going to change my vote to you if you were going to pursue a case against me that involved any reasoning coming from an attack by me on CC.

[SlySly]

No, it's applying the definition of mechanics, not paraphrasing.
But nice try at distorting what's actually there, scum.

What's funny is that you misinterpreted my initial quote as having something to do with CC and now you are battling about something you created and basing it on a case of semantics over a statement you misunderstood. Now that is scummy!

----------------------------

With Caboose's extreme scuminess aside, since I am so stupidly close to lynch, I am going to claim so the town has time to do the best thing to get the most info out of today's lynch.

I am Shere Khan from Jungle Book. I am the Death Miller.

It would have sure been cooler if I was Scrooge, as his character would be perfect for this role too, especially considering the season, but I truly meant what I said about the meaning of my "Bah Humbug" post. .

[SlySly]

Nice job of creating a case out of bullshit on me Caboose. I was scum, yes, but your case on me held no water. The chainsaw defense you claimed I did was in no way what you said it was. It was exactly as I said.

My "Bah, Humbug!" was also exactly what I said it was.

--------------

May I never be on another scum team with Ice. That is twice in a row he has hung me out to dry!!