What am I supposed to do when someone points out I've left my vote on from RVS? Leave it there as an OMGUS for the null-scum read? (not seriously suggesting I or anyone would do that, just saying, what reason do I have to not unvote there?)In post 465, Kop wrote:In post 164, Nautical Dawn wrote:I put it there as a joke and didn’t bother to move it because I haven’t decided where I want to vote for real. I can unvote for now though.In post 162, Random Nurse wrote:Nautical Dawn:I DO find it curious why she placed her vote there, devoid of reasoning, and has left it there ever since. I wonder if she's lining up lims, considering she's already mentioning who she's wanting to lim Day 2.
UNVOTE:
Took me a minute to figure out where you got the Day 2 thing, by “tomorrow” I meant irl-tomorrow and not D2.
I don't like this unvote manner, it feels too much like trying to appease.
I'll just quote myself from earlier.In post 465, Kop wrote:In post 174, Nautical Dawn wrote:I scumread them about equally, THS is just where my focus is right now, plus they haven't had much pressure yet and I'm curious how they react to it.In post 172, Flavor Leaf wrote: Why THS over Nuclear if you scum read them both?
If you scum read them equally, surely you push all slots in order to try gain a better read, rather than sitting on one waiting to see how they react to pressure?
Basically, I felt a lot of the issues with Nuke had already been brought up and there wasn't much more to say. Even though the strength of the scumreads was equal at the time, I had more to say about THS and I also thought I could get more out of pushing him.In post 316, Nautical Dawn wrote: I didn't say too much because I felt a lot of it had already been addressed, but the main thing raising questions for me was this.What reason does Nuke have to assume that that piece of thinking was made up after the fact? It's a weird (and yes, forced-looking imo) accusation to make, and Nuke never gives a good explanation for why he thinks that in those 2-3 pages of arguing.In post 96, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:Was this part of your original thinking?In post 94, Flavor Leaf wrote: But sense I was thinking about possible scum Bugspray, you moving from Bugs to focusing on me is a solid scum/scum move
To be frank, this feels like an added rationalization to a previous OMGUS reaction.(not sure what it means in terms of AI to be completely honest)
I thought they were trying to make a show of pushing the game out of RVS, which I have seen townread before.In post 465, Kop wrote:In post 304, Nautical Dawn wrote:In post 185, TheHoldSteady wrote:This is bewildering to meIn post 151, Nautical Dawn wrote:+town and I like what you're getting at here. Once is nothing out of the ordinary, three times is overkill.In post 48, Skellen wrote:Figured that you counted both bugspray votes, my question was more concerning what made you think RN could have gotten voted out already at page 2 at alleged E-2? Felt iffy with bugspray's vote or something else?In post 45, TheHoldSteady wrote: You all are looking at this at the wrong angle. I was scraping at something to help us get out of RVS because everything posted before the table told us absolutely nothing.
I saw someone else voted RN before me, but I didn't realize it was the same person voting twice. That's why I was like "RN is already at E-2, I'd better unvote to make sure we don't end this prematurely."
It's just a bit odd that you said like three times on this page how you have to scrape something to get out of RVS when you did the instant backwards roll, even doubling down with 27 which kind of weakened your attempt immediately.
You all kept asking "THS, why the table?" and I kept re-explaining and then I'm scum for explaining it too much?I don't scumread you for "explaining it too much," I scumread you because you made a series of posts that looked to me like you were overly concerned with looking towny.In post 219, TheHoldSteady wrote: I don't know what differently you want me to have done here. Dawn's only case against me was that I responded to the same question three different people asked me three times? That I stopped your seemingly incorrect push on Nuke and asked the people who weren't contributing to post so we had more content? Should I have just ignored the repeated questions? What difference would that have made?
You've also made it out like a bunch of people were questioning you when that's not what happened. For example, all I said was that the table was NAI, but the response was this:This response feels defensive as you've already explained your view and my post wasn't even saying anything about you.In post 47, TheHoldSteady wrote: It might not be but you have to start somewhere or else we're going to waste several days not doing anything.
I guess the timing of 46 kind of looks like it was directed at you? Did you think it was? It wasn't. It makes a little more sense if you did think that though.
Literally no one bases a scumread on "they did too many town things" and this isn't a good-faith representation of my case even if you are town.In post 230, TheHoldSteady wrote: Dawn's case was basically "hmm, doing TOO MANY town things here"
Like God, I'm scum read for knowing what I need to do to win the game.
It was a laughably weak case and I think you're scum for calling it good.
What does towny look like? I've seen cases pushed based on he's trying to hard to look towny and it's not a good enough reason for me personally to think their scum because they are trying too hard to look towny.
