Not sure whether I’d switch to SC or Natirasha, but with the deadline still a bit away there’s no reason to leave chenhsi. Still my top suspect, and he hasn’t gotten enough scrutiny or attention for his suspicious activity. Still, we have less time than it seems until deadline, with the upcoming holidays.
SC:
How come you are utterly convinced hyperfocused on me, and then as soon as someone glances at BSW (with something that should not have taken 6 pages to figure out) you all of a sudden unvote me without another word and switch to BSW?
As for your purported case against me- I really think you were just trying to get something to stick, hoping that your arguments avoided scrutiny.
Point 1:
StrangerCoug [116] wrote:<snip>
The benefit to the Mafia is that they'll eventually find out who the vig is by process of elimination.
Well, duh. And the benefit to the town is that we’ll eventually find out who the mafia are by process of elimination. And while the town can win even if it loses all our powerroles, the mafia can’t win if it loses all their members. You’re not considering both sides of this.
I am arguing that the town gets more benefit than the mafia.
StrangerCoug [cont] wrote:The odds of the town roleblocker hitting the Mafia roleblocker isn't very high mathematically and I fear that the vig shooting real bullets will be found and even possibly dead before the town RB locates the Mafia RB. Which is why the consensus is that your idea is bad. The Mafia want the actual vig dead before the Mafia RB is blocked himself, do they not?
<snip>
This is a very odd thing to say. I can’t think of why you care, or why you think the mafia care that much whether the mafia roleblocker is blocked. They get slightly less information, but that’s nothing to do with whether the real vigilante is dead or alive. Really curious where you’re going with this.
Point 2:
StrangerCoug [cont] wrote:The pushy ultimatum. Again, being pushy is scummy.
How on earth do you think that this answers “
I want to you to lay out your complete case against me, now.
Not just a list of what I’ve done; I want an explanation of why you think what I’ve done is suspicious. Because that part keeps changing.”?
There’s no explanation- you listed something I did, and made a blithe generalization. So, please tell me how, considering that you admit you are aware of Natirasha’s pattern of behavior, and agreed that he was behaving antitownly, do you reach the conclusion that that action of mine was antitown?
StrangerCoug [cont] wrote:<snip>
While I'm at it, prove that it mattered to me that your ultimatum was against Natirasha.
<snip>
1) What does that have to do with anything?
2) Why do I need to prove it?
3) Or else what? You’ll… vote me? You’ll… argue that I should be voted?
So, nope. No proof forthcoming from me. I’m calling your bluff.
Point 3:
StrangerCoug [cont] wrote:<snip>
For me to attack this, therefore, is invalid.
So part of your case against me you admit is invalid?
<sarcasm>Why, making an invalid attack- that sounds like something unhelpful that should have been thought out completely beforehand. Now, who was it that I saw using that as a basis for their attack…</sarcasm>
Natirasha:
I retract any indication I gave that you don’t need to die immediately. You have played deliberately antitown. When you got called on it, you appeasingly played slightly better for a couple posts. But then when attention left you, you returned to playing deliberately antitown. Your play does nothing except make it harder for the town to win.
Caboose:
Kind of curious to hear what issue you have with BSW’s argument.
Appassionata:
Appassionata [146] wrote:By Roleplaying did you mean that BlondesoWut is "acting" his "stupid" play?
Did you have any doubt that she was “acting”? And, ignoring the voice that BSW has chosen, what of her play do you consider “stupid”? On the contrary- as Zakeri points out, she’s communicated 2 observations she’s made. (And I’ll go farther, and say that that’s not dependent on whether BSW is or isn’t really inexperienced, as Zakeri prefaced.)
)
