In post 1122, Enchant wrote:In post 1111, Upwards wrote: And now you argue because of him you won’t answer my question?What is your question?
What do you make of 1031?
In post 1122, Enchant wrote:In post 1111, Upwards wrote: And now you argue because of him you won’t answer my question?What is your question?
In post 1125, Upwards wrote:What do you make of 1031?In post 1122, Enchant wrote:In post 1111, Upwards wrote: And now you argue because of him you won’t answer my question?What is your question?
There could be a lot of things going on here but it is an interesting dynamic. Could be Enchant and Upwards as teammates and Upwards doesn't want to let his partner go that easy.In post 1121, Gypyx wrote:Yeah i mean, i think scum upwards wouldn't dare hammering it? at least not without his partner encouraging itIn post 1120, DeltaWave wrote:According to my reads as they are right now, the Enchant wagon is mostly town-led with the notable exception of PoP. It's interesting that nobody hammered, especially because it would have been a justifiable hammer. So either it's Scum!Enchant or my townreads are off.In post 1117, Gypyx wrote: UNVOTE: Enchant
i'm ready to revote but i wonder if scum upwards would've hammered there
i think we're onto scum one way or another today at least
I mean, i was more thinking in the line of "if i kill enchant today they'll deffo go for me tommorow" which would be pretty realistic given upward's rough position, regardless of enchant's alignementIn post 1128, DeltaWave wrote:There could be a lot of things going on here but it is an interesting dynamic. Could be Enchant and Upwards as teammates and Upwards doesn't want to let his partner go that easy.In post 1121, Gypyx wrote:Yeah i mean, i think scum upwards wouldn't dare hammering it? at least not without his partner encouraging itIn post 1120, DeltaWave wrote:According to my reads as they are right now, the Enchant wagon is mostly town-led with the notable exception of PoP. It's interesting that nobody hammered, especially because it would have been a justifiable hammer. So either it's Scum!Enchant or my townreads are off.In post 1117, Gypyx wrote: UNVOTE: Enchant
i'm ready to revote but i wonder if scum upwards would've hammered there
i think we're onto scum one way or another today at least
I see your point, but Upwards was the other big wagon of the day so it doesn't really get Upwards out of anything by not hammering. It's possible that the scumteam didn't want all of them on the same wagon, or if I'm wrong about PoP, Upwards didn't want to hammer a buddy. Or maybe Upwards just got cold feet idkIn post 1130, Gypyx wrote:I mean, i was more thinking in the line of "if i kill enchant today they'll deffo go for me tommorow" which would be pretty realistic given upward's rough position, regardless of enchant's alignementIn post 1128, DeltaWave wrote:There could be a lot of things going on here but it is an interesting dynamic. Could be Enchant and Upwards as teammates and Upwards doesn't want to let his partner go that easy.In post 1121, Gypyx wrote:Yeah i mean, i think scum upwards wouldn't dare hammering it? at least not without his partner encouraging itIn post 1120, DeltaWave wrote:According to my reads as they are right now, the Enchant wagon is mostly town-led with the notable exception of PoP. It's interesting that nobody hammered, especially because it would have been a justifiable hammer. So either it's Scum!Enchant or my townreads are off.In post 1117, Gypyx wrote: UNVOTE: Enchant
i'm ready to revote but i wonder if scum upwards would've hammered there
i think we're onto scum one way or another today at least
What's your case on PoP?In post 1131, DeltaWave wrote:I see your point, but Upwards was the other big wagon of the day so it doesn't really get Upwards out of anything by not hammering. It's possible that the scumteam didn't want all of them on the same wagon, or if I'm wrong about PoP, Upwards didn't want to hammer a buddy. Or maybe Upwards just got cold feet idkIn post 1130, Gypyx wrote:I mean, i was more thinking in the line of "if i kill enchant today they'll deffo go for me tommorow" which would be pretty realistic given upward's rough position, regardless of enchant's alignementIn post 1128, DeltaWave wrote:There could be a lot of things going on here but it is an interesting dynamic. Could be Enchant and Upwards as teammates and Upwards doesn't want to let his partner go that easy.In post 1121, Gypyx wrote:Yeah i mean, i think scum upwards wouldn't dare hammering it? at least not without his partner encouraging itIn post 1120, DeltaWave wrote:According to my reads as they are right now, the Enchant wagon is mostly town-led with the notable exception of PoP. It's interesting that nobody hammered, especially because it would have been a justifiable hammer. So either it's Scum!Enchant or my townreads are off.In post 1117, Gypyx wrote: UNVOTE: Enchant
i'm ready to revote but i wonder if scum upwards would've hammered there
i think we're onto scum one way or another today at least
How much time were you going to give them?In post 1103, Upwards wrote: I want to give him a chance to stop acting and start playing
1. Zebedee's vote pattern was weird. He was on Gamma during the competing Gamma/Margot wagons and then, fairly mysteriously, moved his vote away from either of those wagons (specifically to me) and just sat out the rest of the day until he was replaced. No real rationale was given for this.In post 1132, Laplacian wrote: What's your case on PoP?
Agreed on #1 & 2, rereading ZBD it is a really weird vote. Not sold on #3 though - there's the one major post and a few mentions, but he's spent about as many posts analyzing & discussing Enchant as well.In post 1134, DeltaWave wrote:1. Zebedee's vote pattern was weird. He was on Gamma during the competing Gamma/Margot wagons and then, fairly mysteriously, moved his vote away from either of those wagons (specifically to me) and just sat out the rest of the day until he was replaced. No real rationale was given for this.In post 1132, Laplacian wrote: What's your case on PoP?
2. To make matters worse, he had some interaction with Margot that I see as being critical of Margot. It is somewhat hard for me to tell because I don't totally understand what he was saying but it sounded like he had an issue with Margot. Yet instead of voting Margot, he votes for a go-nowhere wagon and parks himself there without explanation. It feels like scum who doesn't want to bus their buddy on D1 but also doesn't want to be on a mis-elim wagon.
3. PoP replaces in and basically immediately begins defending Upwards, who also had suspicious activity on D1. PoP has posted quite a lot in defense of Upwards and is kind of thin everywhere else.
4. PoP also frustrated me by asking questions that I've answered before. (This may or may not be a scumtell)
However, I did find PoP's comment about Enchant's meta to be interesting and possibly he has a point there. Enchant looks to be more flippant as scum and that tracks in the games PoP posted. So I'm also entertaining Enchant/Upwards as a possibility.
Ugh, I started liking your posting the last couple posts, then you drop this platitude. Heraclitus beat you too it by a good 2000 years.
In post 1141, Laplacian wrote:Ugh, I started liking your posting the last couple posts, then you drop this platitude. Heraclitus beat you too it by a good 2000 years.
Got anything relevant? Explanation for either vote? Why you think I'm so sus? A claim? Cute animated gif?
Well clearly nobody else is going to vote for PoP so I am leading a crusade that's going nowhere. I'm fine with a vote on Enchant for obvious reasons.In post 1138, Laplacian wrote: @Delta, do you agree with that last paragraph? If so, can I persuade you to join the Enchant wagon to try to get a clear on PoP?
I've just softened on Deltawave over the last several pages. You haven't given me, or anyone else, anything to try to change opinions. Even if you think I'm impossibly stubborn, there's 8 other people for you to try to convince and you just yeet straight over the opening I tried to give you.In post 1143, Enchant wrote:In post 1141, Laplacian wrote:Ugh, I started liking your posting the last couple posts, then you drop this platitude. Heraclitus beat you too it by a good 2000 years.
Got anything relevant? Explanation for either vote? Why you think I'm so sus? A claim? Cute animated gif?I am not interested in entertaining you, as you just mock me and assume me as evil.
Even if you are not evildoer, it's waste of time, as you proven to be stubborn.