In post 1047, Vivax wrote: If you guys flip Roden and he turns out scum I‘ll re-evaluate.
Is THIS an example of "signposting"?
In post 1047, Vivax wrote: If you guys flip Roden and he turns out scum I‘ll re-evaluate.
I wouldn’t say so, signposting isn’t just saying what you are going to do in the future, it’s already predicating what’s going to happen. Like if vivax had said “if Roden flips scum then I’m going to reread oats because he looks townie with the flip” then when Roden flips scum he does exactly this and comes back with an “oats is town”In post 1050, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1047, Vivax wrote: If you guys flip Roden and he turns out scum I‘ll re-evaluate.
Is THIS an example of "signposting"?
In post 1052, Oatsmaster wrote: I’m not really sure what you mean in the first part. He’s absolutely saying that you are indicating the actions you are taking before you actually take them.
you did it for instance when you were voting for me but already telling basically youre gonna vote for gob.In post 1056, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I'm asking if I have actually done this, or if he is fabricating this case.
If I've done this, I want to see an actual, concrete, quoted example of me doing so.
Not gonna do this but if you wanna ask him by all meansIn post 1056, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1052, Oatsmaster wrote: I’m not really sure what you mean in the first part. He’s absolutely saying that you are indicating the actions you are taking before you actually take them.
I'm asking if I have actually done this, or if he is fabricating this case.
If I've done this, I want to see an actual, concrete, quoted example of me doing so.
I ask because I am skeptical that I have done it, and I wonder if he is overstating his case and faking evidence that doesn't actually exist. I see a lot of people are still wary about Dann and I wonder if my townread is flawed, and so I'd like to see if he's actually able to make a case.
In post 1055, Oatsmaster wrote:I wouldn’t say so, signposting isn’t just saying what you are going to do in the future, it’s already predicating what’s going to happen. Like if vivax had said “if Roden flips scum then I’m going to reread oats because he looks townie with the flip” then when Roden flips scum he does exactly this and comes back with an “oats is town”In post 1050, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1047, Vivax wrote: If you guys flip Roden and he turns out scum I‘ll re-evaluate.
Is THIS an example of "signposting"?
In post 1059, Oatsmaster wrote:Not gonna do this but if you wanna ask him by all meansIn post 1056, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1052, Oatsmaster wrote: I’m not really sure what you mean in the first part. He’s absolutely saying that you are indicating the actions you are taking before you actually take them.
I'm asking if I have actually done this, or if he is fabricating this case.
If I've done this, I want to see an actual, concrete, quoted example of me doing so.
I ask because I am skeptical that I have done it, and I wonder if he is overstating his case and faking evidence that doesn't actually exist. I see a lot of people are still wary about Dann and I wonder if my townread is flawed, and so I'd like to see if he's actually able to make a case.
If/when Roden flips, ill pursue it more seriously.In post 1060, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1055, Oatsmaster wrote:I wouldn’t say so, signposting isn’t just saying what you are going to do in the future, it’s already predicating what’s going to happen. Like if vivax had said “if Roden flips scum then I’m going to reread oats because he looks townie with the flip” then when Roden flips scum he does exactly this and comes back with an “oats is town”In post 1050, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1047, Vivax wrote: If you guys flip Roden and he turns out scum I‘ll re-evaluate.
Is THIS an example of "signposting"?
Do you, or anyone else, think he's covering his tracks with this statement? Because I definitely do.
In post 1058, outoforder wrote:you did it for instance when you were voting for me but already telling basically youre gonna vote for gob.In post 1056, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I'm asking if I have actually done this, or if he is fabricating this case.
If I've done this, I want to see an actual, concrete, quoted example of me doing so.
In post 348, SuperfluousNinja wrote: [...]
I'm leaving my vote on OutOfOrder for now because I want to see my actions through on that one, but I'm fully in favor of a vote against Gob after all this.
Good morning gobIn post 1065, gob wrote: smh rude ass :sideeyeemoji:
I think Dann is capable of looking at things from multiple perspectives.In post 1020, Oatsmaster wrote:thoughts on what ooo and me are talking about?In post 1019, Dunnstral wrote:I was expecting some pushback from my read on them but they either didn't get there yet or didn't find it memorable.In post 981, Oatsmaster wrote: Okay so Roden came back vomited up some stuff and left, what are y’all thoughts about it?
Town: viewtopic.php?t=92020In post 1021, outoforder wrote: Gotta go to work. I would appreciate if you, Dunnstral could link to your latest town and mafia game so i can read them after i get back home.
To expand on my post, Dannflor would not be 100% sure that Vivax is mafia so is still capable of looking at things from a perspective where Vivax is town. That is why they are asking questions like that - because they are considering things from multiple angles. (Or if mafia, that's what they'd like us to believe. I do think they are quite good at mafia which makes it hard to townread them, which I believe is something they get irritated at.)In post 1018, outoforder wrote:It's actually a bit weird he says this:In post 1012, Oatsmaster wrote:he does say this right before but otherwise you are in his firmly town section in the reads list that he posted a while before this whole thing happened.In post 865, Dannflor wrote: I guess if I’m wrong on a town read in these three I think OoO is the most likely to be wrong?
idk just that masons wouldnt be the first place my brain goes to if someone yells dont yeet that dudeI mean, he has just expressed suspicion towards Vivax.In post 865, Dannflor wrote:In post 859, Vivax wrote: To be clear, my current pool would be Oats/Ninja/OoO but Ninja is more on a whim right now.
That said I appreciate that Naerys thinks similarly.
I guess if I’m wrong on a town read in these three I think OoO is the most likely to be wrong?
I feel increasingly solid about Ninja as town
Why does he care about who Vivax scumreads? Or like "if one of these three NEEDS to be mafia THEN it's this guy". Seems a bit out of place how to talk to your scumread.
They were talking about 499 earlier (not the post you're quoting here) when they talked about you putting me in null but scumreading me. I think your categories were correct but they were likely confused by the part you wrote about me at the end.In post 1064, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 1058, outoforder wrote:you did it for instance when you were voting for me but already telling basically youre gonna vote for gob.In post 1056, SuperfluousNinja wrote: I'm asking if I have actually done this, or if he is fabricating this case.
If I've done this, I want to see an actual, concrete, quoted example of me doing so.
Ugh, I am getting really tired of people just referring to things I did without actually quoting me.
EVIDENCE, PEOPLE. USE IT. STOP JUST TALKING ABOUT THINGS THAT HAPPENED AND SHOW THEM HAPPENING.
I don't know why I'm getting frustrated this morning lol but I think I am a little bothered that people are just saying "X did Y" without actually demonstrating that X did Y. Let's see some real evidence, folks.