Because she would have to agree with the notion from Ninja that I was panicking and tried to distract away from her by voting Dunnstral.In post 1872, Dannflor wrote:why on earth does this make hu tao scum??? like actuallyIn post 1870, Vivax wrote: Kinda mad I didn‘t realize first that she was agreeing with ninja on something making me scum that had herself being scum as a prerequisite condition.
In post 1868, Vivax wrote:I like to laugh ?In post 1867, SuperfluousNinja wrote: OK but why even say it to me if you did?
Usually I also like it to make others laugh so it‘s hard for me to get behind why you found it offensive.
Everyone made some ridiculously wrong posts at some point.
again, take this one step further, it also relies on the assumption of Vivax being mafia as well. so like, are you saying Vivax must also be mafia based on that?In post 1876, DarthPunk wrote: why does she agree with that as town when it relies on an assumption of her being mafia for the post to make sense.
It’s as simple as town!ht can’t agree with that post in any way that makes sense but she does, so what does that mean for town!ht?In post 1877, Dannflor wrote: I guess I feel it is more reasonable to assume that Hu Tao agreed your behavior was suspicious for other reasons, rather than that scum!HuTao thought "oh yes, I am scum that Vivax is trying to distract from"
I mean by that logic Hu Tao wouldn't agree with that unless you were scum with her as well
Lets do it up.In post 1882, Vivax wrote: Sample conversation
Grack : ‚I think Dannflor is scum and Darthpunk has done something to deflect from him.‘
Dannflor: ‚Yes I agree with Grack, let‘s vote Darthpunk‘
But she should KNOW that she is TOWNIn post 1879, Dannflor wrote:again, take this one step further, it also relies on the assumption of Vivax being mafia as well. so like, are you saying Vivax must also be mafia based on that?In post 1876, DarthPunk wrote: why does she agree with that as town when it relies on an assumption of her being mafia for the post to make sense.
why isn't it reasonable to assume that Hu Tao agreed that Vivax's behavior was suspicious for other reasons? Like Hu Tao JUST explained in 1847?
This might be the biggest misrep I've ever seen. Either you don't get the point, or you're doing this on purpose.In post 1865, DarthPunk wrote:Do you agree that vivax was panicking to the plethora of evidence of your guilt? I did read the post before but I don’t see how that applies when ninja is talking like you are guilty and then you agree with the post.In post 1856, Hu Tao wrote:Um. Read my post before that. It pretty much explains?In post 1851, DarthPunk wrote:What parts do you agree with here?In post 1841, Hu Tao wrote:We actually agree for onceIn post 1801, SuperfluousNinja wrote: NGL, Vivax's sudden vote on Dunnstral feels like a panic move in response to a sudden plethora of convincing evidence of Hu Tao's guilt. Why are we suddenly shifting to Dunnstral? How convenient that it's a fairly inactive person. How odd that Vivax says so little to justify the vote.
I don't really like how little engagement Vivax made with my request for info on Hu Tao, either. He seemed unaware that I even suspected him, and frankly I haven't a clue what to make of that, but it's either neutral or willful scum obstinance.
UNVOTE: unvote
VOTE: Hu tao
Yeah you're scumIn post 1869, Vivax wrote:loool smackdownIn post 1865, DarthPunk wrote:Do you agree that vivax was panicking to the plethora of evidence of your guilt? I did read the post before but I don’t see how that applies when ninja is talking like you are guilty and then you agree with the post.In post 1856, Hu Tao wrote:Um. Read my post before that. It pretty much explains?In post 1851, DarthPunk wrote:What parts do you agree with here?In post 1841, Hu Tao wrote:We actually agree for onceIn post 1801, SuperfluousNinja wrote: NGL, Vivax's sudden vote on Dunnstral feels like a panic move in response to a sudden plethora of convincing evidence of Hu Tao's guilt. Why are we suddenly shifting to Dunnstral? How convenient that it's a fairly inactive person. How odd that Vivax says so little to justify the vote.
I don't really like how little engagement Vivax made with my request for info on Hu Tao, either. He seemed unaware that I even suspected him, and frankly I haven't a clue what to make of that, but it's either neutral or willful scum obstinance.
UNVOTE: unvote
VOTE: Hu tao
VOTE: Hu Tao
Changing stances to get off after caught Glad you're seeing that you're seeing vivax walk this in circlesIn post 1872, Dannflor wrote:why on earth does this make hu tao scum??? like actuallyIn post 1870, Vivax wrote: Kinda mad I didn‘t realize first that she was agreeing with ninja on something making me scum that had herself being scum as a prerequisite condition.
!!!!!In post 1879, Dannflor wrote:again, take this one step further, it also relies on the assumption of Vivax being mafia as well. so like, are you saying Vivax must also be mafia based on that?In post 1876, DarthPunk wrote: why does she agree with that as town when it relies on an assumption of her being mafia for the post to make sense.
why isn't it reasonable to assume that Hu Tao agreed that Vivax's behavior was suspicious for other reasons? Like Hu Tao JUST explained in 1847?
Maybe you're just misunderstanding but read my new post if that clears it upIn post 1880, DarthPunk wrote:It’s as simple as town!ht can’t agree with that post in any way that makes sense but she does, so what does that mean for town!ht?In post 1877, Dannflor wrote: I guess I feel it is more reasonable to assume that Hu Tao agreed your behavior was suspicious for other reasons, rather than that scum!HuTao thought "oh yes, I am scum that Vivax is trying to distract from"
I mean by that logic Hu Tao wouldn't agree with that unless you were scum with her as well
In post 1887, Hu Tao wrote:This might be the biggest misrep I've ever seen. Either you don't get the point, or you're doing this on purpose.In post 1865, DarthPunk wrote:Do you agree that vivax was panicking to the plethora of evidence of your guilt? I did read the post before but I don’t see how that applies when ninja is talking like you are guilty and then you agree with the post.In post 1856, Hu Tao wrote:Um. Read my post before that. It pretty much explains?In post 1851, DarthPunk wrote:What parts do you agree with here?In post 1841, Hu Tao wrote:We actually agree for onceIn post 1801, SuperfluousNinja wrote: NGL, Vivax's sudden vote on Dunnstral feels like a panic move in response to a sudden plethora of convincing evidence of Hu Tao's guilt. Why are we suddenly shifting to Dunnstral? How convenient that it's a fairly inactive person. How odd that Vivax says so little to justify the vote.
I don't really like how little engagement Vivax made with my request for info on Hu Tao, either. He seemed unaware that I even suspected him, and frankly I haven't a clue what to make of that, but it's either neutral or willful scum obstinance.
UNVOTE: unvote
VOTE: Hu tao
I'm saying that I think that vivax scum sees me as town. But knows that regardless of how it's looking I'll be eliminated soon. And when that happens he can say he tried to push it in a different direction to gain town points. Now how is that anything of what you just said?
it is frustrating lolIn post 1894, DarthPunk wrote: I can't even deal with this site tbh. it's like we are playing a game with two different sets of rules at the same time.
HT - you agreed with THAT POST SPECIFICALLY.In post 1895, DarthPunk wrote:In post 1887, Hu Tao wrote:This might be the biggest misrep I've ever seen. Either you don't get the point, or you're doing this on purpose.In post 1865, DarthPunk wrote:Do you agree that vivax was panicking to the plethora of evidence of your guilt? I did read the post before but I don’t see how that applies when ninja is talking like you are guilty and then you agree with the post.In post 1856, Hu Tao wrote:Um. Read my post before that. It pretty much explains?In post 1851, DarthPunk wrote:What parts do you agree with here?In post 1841, Hu Tao wrote:We actually agree for onceIn post 1801, SuperfluousNinja wrote: NGL, Vivax's sudden vote on Dunnstral feels like a panic move in response to a sudden plethora of convincing evidence of Hu Tao's guilt. Why are we suddenly shifting to Dunnstral? How convenient that it's a fairly inactive person. How odd that Vivax says so little to justify the vote.
I don't really like how little engagement Vivax made with my request for info on Hu Tao, either. He seemed unaware that I even suspected him, and frankly I haven't a clue what to make of that, but it's either neutral or willful scum obstinance.
UNVOTE: unvote
VOTE: Hu tao
I'm saying that I think that vivax scum sees me as town. But knows that regardless of how it's looking I'll be eliminated soon. And when that happens he can say he tried to push it in a different direction to gain town points. Now how is that anything of what you just said?
That is not what the post you agreed with said.
I'll break this down again since you maybe just don't understand.In post 1884, DarthPunk wrote:But she should KNOW that she is TOWNIn post 1879, Dannflor wrote:again, take this one step further, it also relies on the assumption of Vivax being mafia as well. so like, are you saying Vivax must also be mafia based on that?In post 1876, DarthPunk wrote: why does she agree with that as town when it relies on an assumption of her being mafia for the post to make sense.
why isn't it reasonable to assume that Hu Tao agreed that Vivax's behavior was suspicious for other reasons? Like Hu Tao JUST explained in 1847?
She doesn't KNOW anything more than that, so why does she agree with something with the premise that she is NOT TOWN.
FFS.
Yeah... I instantly want to call you mafia for what you are doing right now, and I can tell you want to call me mafia for what I am doing right now.In post 1896, Dannflor wrote:it is frustrating lolIn post 1894, DarthPunk wrote: I can't even deal with this site tbh. it's like we are playing a game with two different sets of rules at the same time.