In post 4009, Grackaroni wrote:
In post 4008, Oatsmaster wrote:
In post 4005, Grackaroni wrote:
In post 4002, Oatsmaster wrote:
In post 4000, Grackaroni wrote:
In post 3996, Oatsmaster wrote:
In post 2438, Grackaroni wrote:
I put you as a top town read since you were active and reading through people's games to make meta reads + OutofOrder/DP both reading you as lock town.
We'll see what comes out though I'm just speculating baselessly.
In post 2450, Grackaroni wrote:
In post 2447, Oatsmaster wrote:
In post 2443, SuperfluousNinja wrote:
That's great, but like, why would we yeet anyone other than whoever Hu Tao mentions today?
Obviously we need to know if they are lying, and if they are, we yeet Hu Tao next, which I'm sure Hu Tao is well aware of, thus they wouldn't just make this up.
I see no reason to doubt Hu Tao here and don't plan on focusing on anyone other than whoever they bring up today.
Really depends on their claim, I’m also not a fan of the claim being done so early in the day
lol then why did you start by posting 'alright let's goooooo'
Your first reaction to many things in this game has been to call them terrible.
very very odd flip between 20 minutes of actual time
Announcing a red check puts scum in a position where they need to act in the same way that scum needs to act when they're reacting to a scum flip.
You've been cantankerous about pretty much every play this game and you thought that the correct play was to withhold the information and yet you were the only one cheering on the reveal. To me that's strange.
So walk me through what goes through scum!oats mind during that time.
"I better cheer so I don't look suspicious"
.
.
.
.
.
"What a dumb play. Hu-Tao should have withheld the red check to get more information."
Can you address why you are scumreading me for the very thing you are doing?
I really don't think that's what I'm doing.
When I scum read DP it was not the thread sentiment. People started moving towards DP and it provoked a strong reaction from DP.
When I made a push to vote you today it also provoked a strong reaction because I think I made it clear that I was intending to push for my read to try to get an execution.
Generally people will react strongly to getting limmed as either alignment cause either they -know- you are wrong or they are -acting- like you are wrong.
Either way NAI in my opinion.
I can see why people think oats is mafia, but I don’t think they are right, and I think the dann read is wrong too, although he is reacting strongly to the same stuff as me and ooo he has made genuinely good points and analysis that was original and relevant.
I started reading his mafia game from tl and while there were similarities to this game, I think in that game there was basically zero good analysis which is not the same.
I have had doubts about being pocketed by oats. But it’s also just as likely that we both think of the game the same way as we learned to play mafia at the same time with the same meta.
Further, I can see analysis, read progression and a world view of the game that makes sense to me.
He may be right or wrong but at least to me it is a consistent world view.
I can’t see any of that from gob. And his claim just doesn’t really make sense in terms of why claim then as opposed to any other time.
