In post 1609, hellbooks wrote:i thought that my unvote on ranger was su[pposed to be the load bearing thing that was calcifying the gamestate in despair but when i revoted nothing changed
Perhaps consider it's because scum don't care which of {usesPython, Ranger} get eliminated.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1616, fireisredsir wrote:python it just feels like you're having to twist and assume a lot of things about both town and scum behavior that don't really make sense to assume in order to justify your mindset as consistent
Though I agree, I tend to associate that behavior with town.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1608, Political Clout wrote:I'm fine with a tris or ranger lim as well if people want to switch there. I had the most wonderful nap.
I know which of those two you're likely to vote.
is that like a dare or something? your problem with me if i'm right here is that i'm not doing enough or it seems like i'm not digging deep. but what would satisfy you what kind of post should I be making where does enough end for me when is it enough will it ever be enough? this sort of ambiguous amorphous charge against me I'm not buying it. at all. I feel very ambivalent about it in fact. the mixed up ness comes from on the one hand it might be true that I didn't dig deep enough on the other I am actually quite proud and satisfied with what I have done so far especially with at the time I believe it was 20 or 22 hours remaining.;
In post 1626, Black wrote:I can't really get a read on python's survivability because I've seen them do it as scum and as town. It doesn't feel good though
I don't mind a tris or Ranger vote
In post 1608, Political Clout wrote:I'm fine with a tris or ranger lim as well if people want to switch there.
Color me skeptical both Black and Political Clout have the exact same statements.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1619, fireisredsir wrote:
you just said that you've been too busy trying not to die to get reads on the newer posts
setting aside the fact that i think those things shouldn't really need to be mutually exclusive for town
i would rather you do that
Jupiter hasn't changed since the replacements came in
Ranger we agree with all her reads except swap Black and Jupiter in the tier lists and is also putting in leveragable effort to get a tris CW going which is pretty A tier, we're not scumreading her here
PC is annoying to read accurately cause they're a known tunneler as both alignments with value systems that we're not familiar with so we'd normally go with the pred read, but Roden did basically nothing this game so that not a high percentage move either so idk how to get a read there. Best we can do is say not enough info rn and to watch for switch/continue behaviours on their tunnels in the future to see if it makes sense with the stated levels of conviction they're putting out
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1626, Black wrote:I can't really get a read on python's survivability because I've seen them do it as scum and as town. It doesn't feel good though
I don't mind a tris or Ranger vote
In post 1608, Political Clout wrote:I'm fine with a tris or ranger lim as well if people want to switch there.
Color me skeptical both Black and Political Clout have the exact same statements.
In post 1626, Black wrote:
I can't really get a read on python's survivability because I've seen them do it as scum and as town. It doesn't feel good though
I don't mind a tris or Ranger vote
Just to be clear I think Black is town
If blatant survivability is something that we do as both sides why are you feelbadding it instead of NAIbinning it
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1634, Political Clout wrote:what would satisfy you what kind of post should I be making where does enough end for me when is it enough will it ever be enough?
That's the issue I have with you. You are focused on "what would satisfy". It feels like what you have done has been efforts to satisfy, rather than efforts to solve.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1626, Black wrote:
I can't really get a read on python's survivability because I've seen them do it as scum and as town. It doesn't feel good though
I don't mind a tris or Ranger vote
Just to be clear I think Black is town
If blatant survivability is something that we do as both sides why are you feelbadding it instead of NAIbinning it
I think the feelbadding is just a natural reaction to it, especially having seen you do it so recently as scum
In post 1634, Political Clout wrote:what would satisfy you what kind of post should I be making where does enough end for me when is it enough will it ever be enough?
That's the issue I have with you. You are focused on "what would satisfy". It feels like what you have done has been efforts to satisfy, rather than efforts to solve.
I think out of any player in this game. the person you are saying this is about is the person that it is least true for
In post 1636, usesPython wrote:
Ranger we agree with all her reads except swap Black and Jupiter in the tier lists and is also putting in leveragable effort to get a tris CW going which is pretty A tier, we're not scumreading her here
In post 1634, Political Clout wrote:what would satisfy you what kind of post should I be making where does enough end for me when is it enough will it ever be enough?
That's the issue I have with you. You are focused on "what would satisfy". It feels like what you have done has been efforts to satisfy, rather than efforts to solve.
that's my point... you initially started talking about satisfying end goals. I'm just trying to play the game. unless I'm reading it all wrong. you tell me.
In post 1636, usesPython wrote:
Ranger we agree with all her reads except swap Black and Jupiter in the tier lists and is also putting in leveragable effort to get a tris CW going which is pretty A tier, we're not scumreading her here
Do you townread Ranger?
Think so yeah
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I think the active useful effort from Ranger in getting a tris wagon going instead of being half hearted about it and letting her teammates save her is what's pushing us over the edge there
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1634, Political Clout wrote:what would satisfy you what kind of post should I be making where does enough end for me when is it enough will it ever be enough?
That's the issue I have with you. You are focused on "what would satisfy". It feels like what you have done has been efforts to satisfy, rather than efforts to solve.
I think out of any player in this game. the person you are saying this is about is the person that it is least true for
How so?
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1648, hellbooks wrote:
but to be clear thats a recent thing and you werent townreading ranger when you were talking about "if ranger is scum she's unlimmable"?
In post 1421, usesPython wrote:
yeah pretty much, like none of those names individually are very sus but with the new replacements no one really is giga sus so we're reading the gamestate instead
what about the replacement affects your read
PC's saving the Roden slot and we expected Ranger to save the JV slot regardless
why do you expect that
We respect Ranger as a player enough to think she can save both town!JV and scum!JV
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more