In post 573, Psyche wrote:what is wrong with the notascum wagon to you?In post 570, Random Nurse wrote: Could it be Naerys, Psyche, Klick?
*makes measuring gestures with hands*
I mean the guy only posted FIVE times what you mean?
In post 573, Psyche wrote:what is wrong with the notascum wagon to you?In post 570, Random Nurse wrote: Could it be Naerys, Psyche, Klick?
*makes measuring gestures with hands*
NoIn post 496, Klick wrote: Gera, if I showed you examples of Day 1s where scum are caught and eliminated based on D1 content, would you reconsider that belief
Hypothetically, we eliminate Naerys and she’s town. Does that mean the day after, there’s going to be a pile on Hu Tao? Obviously things can happen at night that might give us info but I just don’t want this to bounce back to Hu if we are wrong about Naerys. Hu Tao is someone I am feeling is town, moreso than most at the moment.In post 563, Random Nurse wrote: Were launching Naerys today.
I want to see some consolidation in these random failwagons, people.
because NAS is scum. i'll quote why if you want!In post 577, Random Nurse wrote: OK OK OK stop, why do you want focus shifted over onto NAS who has five posts?
In post 579, Psyche wrote: only posting 5 times is not a town tell
pls doIn post 580, Psyche wrote: i'll quote why if you want!
these aren't scumtells. so i don't really care. why do you?In post 577, Random Nurse wrote: We've got Naerys contradicting herself and refusing to respond to basic questions
OH, OKAY.In post 580, Psyche wrote:because NAS is scum. i'll quote why if you want!In post 577, Random Nurse wrote: OK OK OK stop, why do you want focus shifted over onto NAS who has five posts?
oh cmon i literally did this like one page ago
In post 532, Psyche wrote:In post 512, Psyche wrote: the page provides an entire system for classifying self-votes and explains in detail how each type of self vote could come from scumorfrom town.
then the only sentence from which it can be gleaned that anyone thinks self-voting is a scumtell is:
"While this practice is commonly seen as scum-indicative, no data has been compiled on the actual effectiveness of self-voting as a towntell or a scumtell."
this is arguably the most disapproving way that a writer could conceivably share that information without openly abandoning wikipedia's editorial guidelines
but someone clinging to the mafia wiki for dear life took the exact opposite message home?
it does not pass the smell testVOTE: notascumIn post 518, Psyche wrote: also it's not the pulling out the wiki that's scummy
it's the fiction that the slot decided to vote hu tao based on the content of that wiki
i think this is it, the easy D1 slam dunk that even this town deserves
i will try really hard not to be too obnoxious about how shitty every other wagon is by comparison
here's a deal for you RN:In post 556, Psyche wrote:is just really wild to read when the vote for hu tao was in this post:In post 554, NotAScum wrote: I mentioned self-vote on its own doesn't mean much. But when you've this possible scum who jumped on the RN train and then a train starts forming on them, they could use the self-vote to subdue it.
In post 183, NotAScum wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Self-votingIn post 155, Hu Tao wrote: I'm so confident Naerys flips scum this game. Eliminate me and vote her out tomorrow. I agree with this.
VOTE: hu tao
She's contradicting herself. She does this as scum. She literally I'd saying the thing she did as town last game is now scummy when I do it.
VOTE: Hu Tao
In post 583, Psyche wrote:these aren't scumtells. so i don't really care. why do you?In post 577, Random Nurse wrote: We've got Naerys contradicting herself and refusing to respond to basic questions
In post 594, davesaz wrote: Going after LHF and white knighting are a powerful combination. Have you pocketed anyone this game?
Not you.In post 596, Random Nurse wrote:In post 594, davesaz wrote: Going after LHF and white knighting are a powerful combination. Have you pocketed anyone this game?
Who is this directed towards?