I'm sorry to hear that, Thestatusquo.
I have found the following inconsistencies in Mizzy's play:
Votes Ramus for self-voting. She mainly pursued him day one while also defending CR. This was apparently a "policy" vote, though, as she has not pursued Ramus' successor.
Post 73 criticises the wagon on CR without giving reasons.
Post 99 uses CC's Post 95 criticism of urielzyx's Post 94 "WIFOM" again to defend ClockworkRuse.
Post 158 I find extremely questionable:
Mizzy wrote:ortolan wrote:EVEN APART FROM THIS, there is nothing inherently scummy about an OMGUS vote ANYWAY, so this argument has absolutely no substance.
Actually, I don't agree fully with this sentiment; I feel that an OMGUS vote is scummy because it is an easy vote to make that doesn't take thought, doesn't utilize logic or a case, and in general, is anti-town. Anti-town != scum, but it does = scum
my
.
This is a plain denial of the fact that even if my vote on CR was what is generally considered "OMGUS", i.e. I was voting him after he voted me, it certainly wasn't made with no reasons.
I also don't like that ort does, indeed, seem to have been waiting around for others to make his cases for him.
This is patently untrue. At that point I had made substantial arguments against CR, and furthermore actively argued with him. See my posts: 70, 105, 113, 117, 136, 138, 153. How can you possibly claim I was parasiting on others' arguments? You seem to just be copying what CR said in Post 152 without applying any critique to it:
CR wrote:Also note, that Ort has to use the cases brought against me by others and has little to nothing to add to my case. In other words, Ort has been sitting around and waiting for a reasonable case to build.
She also revisits this in a qualified form in Post 164, without any regard to the fact it's entirely untrue:
No, I am implying that he is lazy. As you point out, he hasn't really been opportunistic.
THEN, there's also the stuff about wanting me to answer CR's "open" question:
Also waiting for an answer to #155.
etc. etc. Still inexplicable and as a result suspicious. Also re-read Posts 176, 177, 179, 180, 181, 186 and 188 to see she was in fact wrong about whom the question was addressed to.
What interests me is Axelrod's Post 214. Note Axelrod replaced Ramus, who Mizzy had been attacking all day. Furthermore, he even goes on to vote CR, who Mizzy had been defending all day. This should support all of Mizzy's suspicions about Ramus/Axelrod. But I don't even see her comment on it. This is what makes it look like her attack on Ramus was purely "policy". Furthermore I wonder why she attacked him so strongly then dropped off apathetically when his replacement came in, even though his play should have affirmed her suspicions, if they genuinely existed.
Mizzy Post 268 wrote:I don't think he's scum, no, and I do think his wagon has a high amount of scum in it because he's intelligent and very perceptive; a dangerous pro-town player to have.
At that point there were five players voting for CR: urielzyx, ortolan, Axelrod, CarnCarn, roflcopter. So even if all three scum were voting for him (I would be surprised if this were the case anyhow) two townies were also. Furthermore, even as you describe his play as "intelligent and perceptive", he had actually admitted that in the case of his main target for the game, me, he had been tunneling. So it seems you had a higher estimation of CR's play than even he did. Here is my theory about your motivations: you jumped in in Post 73 to defend CR. I think you, as scum, wanted to gain brownie points by defending someone you know to be town (which it looks like CR is in light of recent events). Thus if he were lynched you could claim to have been defending a townie. That's why you defended him without even justifying doing so. And that's why you've been more complimentary to his play than even he himself has been.
The best part, really, though, is in Post 363 you voted Natirasha. Thus you want him lynched. THEN, when I unvote in response to CR's role-claim, which as CarnCarn pointed out has the effect of lynching the person you wanted lynched (Natirasha), and saving the person you didn't want lynched (CR), you actually try to throw suspicion onto me for it (Post 436).
Vote: Mizzy
I will probably make a post with commentary on more recent events but I really did have a lot to say about Mizzy