Because you do not play like a misguided townie.In post 1713, Gypyx wrote:Yes but why am i scum instead of a misguided townieIn post 1710, Snow2697 wrote: May be you are right. But I think that Gypyx-Thomith went too far in trying to lim me without reason, and I went to far fighting them back.
E.g. I have set out my D3 suspects list, but my views were not set out in stone, since yeah, I don't know people's slots and can be mistaken. But what about misguided townie Gypyx? Why is Snow the most scummy? Why is Snow more scummy than Thomith, Naerys, Gypyx herself or any other slot? There were voices that Snow should not be limmed today for specific reasons, how did Gypyx take into account this view and the reasons? Why is Gypyx convinced that these people are wrong that early? There are also people who have not set out their views (or full views) yet, why did Gypyx not let them have a say before directing the lime?
So will a townie who appreciates that he/she can be misguided call people "locked towns"/"locked scums" without particular reasons, ignore position of the others, claim town leadership and direct execution of a slot which is (on any account) not the scummiest at the table? Especially where this townie understands that some of his/her D1/D2 moves were not ideal ("busy", "parking vote", "counterwagon against a scum"). Why would this townie claim leadership in the first place? Why would this townie expect the others to accept his/her leadership? Why would this townie expect the town to accept his/her leadership on D4 after a D3 mislim? Is it behaviour of a misguided honest townie or of a scum where things are getting hot for him/her and his/her partner?
So who are you Gypyx and are you not a scum? And who is Thomith, who was very active initially (while you were not), but then his activity reduced and yours expanded? And why are you not both scums acting together?
