My response to zwet's response to me, and some other stuffs.
zwetschenwasser wrote:1> To act crazy
I'm about halfway satisfied with this.
zwetschenwasser wrote:2> Seeing how people went nuts over it, I did it again so I could pay attention to reactions
Why were the reactions the first time not good enough? I still think claiming God was going too far.
zwetschenwasser wrote:3> That's the only reason I'm voting for you, and it came after my God claim.
This doesn't answer my question. You had four posts in between your claim and your vote on me - all of which were unrelated to a possible vote on me. So I ask again, why did you take so long to come to the conclusion my reaction wasn't quite right?
zwetschenwasser wrote:4> You are correct
Fair enough.
zwetschenwasser wrote:5> If you don't believe me, you can go through the trouble of looking for them yourself. I just completed my first MafiaScum game (not other forum game), which was Election, and I was the town cop.
Acceptable.
zwetschenwasser wrote:6> I'll do some.
a)early meta justification for a random vote, mainly a joke
Still, you made it sound like your reasoning, and despite being early on, it didn't sound like a joke to me.
zwetschenwasser wrote:b)that was the thought. The vote was scummy, without good reasons, and opportunistic
'Kay.
zwetschenwasser wrote:c)I was very tired, and I wanted to be a little crazy, so I screwed around by claiming ICL. When I saw that it started some reactions, I did it again (this time to be useful)
Again, what was wrong with the reactions to the first claim?
zwetschenwasser wrote:d)maskman voted me for making a joke, and he said srsly?, so I did it right back at him.
Heh. Not sure I like this one, but 'kay.
zwetschenwasser wrote:e)he was being a jerk to everyone and acting like he owned the world and could just curse at everyone and act nastily. Venting my frustration at him.
But why did you vote Zakeri? That was the question - what's the reasoning behind that vote?
zwetschenwasser wrote:f)someone came up with the possibility of me being a genius that could use reverse-reverse psychology to make me not look like god, and then said that he didn't think I could be so smart, so yeah. I'm not god though, and the post amused me.
Sounds like WIFOM to me. And where'd Double A come into that?
zwetschenwasser wrote:g)DGB was saying that I was scum because I was agnostic. Hello?
(?) - quote this please?
zwetschenwasser wrote:h)g was the DGB reason, and Double A looked a little too noobish to not put some suspicion on him.
Skill level shouldn't affect who you put suspicion on - it's actions.
zwetschenwasser wrote:i)I realized Double A was a noob, and posted that I believed that he probably was an agnostic still getting the feel of the game and learning stuff. The second half was a joke.
Hm. 'Kay.
zwetschenwasser wrote:j)Pacman's actively lurking and I don't like that. I'm suspecting him right now, right after you.
Fair enough.
zwetschenwasser wrote:k)DGB crazily switched to supporting me. First she was calling me obvscum and then she started saying "good catch, buddy! You're right! Pacman is obvscum! Lynch him quick!" Seemed too convenient to me.
I see. Like him, though, I think you're a recruit - someone we don't need to lynch.
zwetschenwasser wrote:l)I've already explained that what I learned from the first time was that I could get some great reactions from claiming God
Same question as before.
zwetschenwasser wrote:m)I already explained why your reaction was strange. I thought you should have noticed I was trying to get reactions and just leave me alone, not ask for me to get replaced. That's a large part of why I'm voting for you.
I ask people who claim scum to replace out because it's no fun when someone claims scum - they're either scum and they've given the town a free scumkill (which is very much against the spirit of the game), or they're town and want to be offed. I'm sort of surprised you weren't lynched for that kill.
zwetschenwasser wrote:o)DGB called my Jebus vote opportunistic towards wherever the town was going. The town wasn't going towards you, it was going towards Zakeri, so DGB's point was flawed.
Not really - as I said, you waited till five~ posts later to vote for me. Opportunistic only because of the timeline - before, you were apologetic, and made no mention of my reaction until five posts later.
zwetschenwasser wrote:p)Sarcasm. DGB was being completely opportunistic, after calling me out on it.
'kay.
zwetschenwasser wrote:q)It is clearly untrue. And don't start talking about me being apologetic, because it was mainly meant to appease you from your overreaction.
Um... 'kay? Either way, this still doesn't answer why you didn't hop on my wagon 'till much later.
zwetschenwasser wrote:I think you could have figured out most of my trains of thought without this rundown, and by asking these questions you are making yourself even more suspicious. I'm not that unclear, even with one-liners, and you make it seem like I'm actively trying to confuse people with undecipherable logic, which is not true.
Again, as I said when I responded before, I wanted clarification - I had a general idea of where you were going, but I wanted to be sure before I called you out on anything. And questioning doesn't make one suspicious - you are unclear with your one liners, I'm not really sure in which direction to take most of your posts, which doesn't help me. I'm not saying this is a scumtell, I'm saying that while you may understand your thinking, someone else might not.
Jebus wrote:Current thought - DGB is God. Zwet is Islamic CL.
^Though very likely wrong. I'd still like to hear what people have to say on it, though.
Still looking for a response.
zwetschenwasser wrote:He didn't even give me a compliment.
Sorry D:
SilverPhoenix wrote:Jebus wrote:
For the moment, I merely have time to check to see if you answered - I don't really have time to figure out what answer goes to what question (basically, tl;dr at the moment).
Oh, the irony of that statement: "The One-Liner" writing a post too long to read. XD
I know, really xD
DrippingGoofball wrote:ortolan wrote:yes...
Describe Jebus' meta.
Ortolan: Still waiting on this.
And DGB, this is why I'm holding off on saying something about Ort. Though as of now, I agree his vote is bull.
mask man wrote:Lol,
now that everyone has had a chance to die laughing...
Jebus, the only one of your attacks on zwet which have really phased me are numbers 3 and 5.
> You slightly change your reasoning to get on a wagon.
> You almost never explain your thinking.
Go on, please.
ortolan wrote:Still liking the Jebus wagon
He concoted a huge attack vote post against zwet, which suggests he is sweating at the prospect of being lynched
Though that's not the case - I was pretty unhappy with not being able to completely understand where he was going with his posts.
ortolan wrote:most of this post is "explain that thought" with little real analysis. Yes zwet comes across as scummy (new), but unfortunately in this game you can't ride by on getting mislynches like that today, because we are only looking for one very specific scum playa. I think you're much more likely to be He than zwet is.
I wasn't really accusing Zwet of being scum, moreso I was asking further before I take it anywhere - I really don't/didn't expect a Zwet wagon, either.
ortolan wrote:This "bussing God" discussion is stupid. It certainly couldn't be the form of a normal bus- if God dies then they lose automatically. But furthermore the cult
leaders
have no particular reason to dissociate themselves from God- if they get lynched then they've lost anyway so they don't care if God gets caught as a result of their flip. Perhaps their recruits might care more. I am thinking in general the cults would react tentatively towards votes on God and if they looked serious/dangerous then start to jump in by arguing against them.
Agreed. The prospect of CL's bussing God is sorta rediculous :s
pacman281292 wrote:X wrote:
pacman:
Has 3 posts. A late random vote, a request for prods (ironic) combined with an FoS of ZSW, and a question of "What do we do?"
I've been busy, and I don't get this game.
Then replace out?
zwetschenwasser wrote:I thought Double A was pretending to know less than he did, with his "what's an FoS" and "I'm confused" posts. But I realized later that my thinking was really stupid, and he is just getting a feel for the game, so I killed my suspicion of him. And I'm definitely not trying to discredit the guy. I'm just pointing out my thoughts on him. If he comes up with good arguments I'll be more than willing to follow and back them up. Pacman, could you put that quote in context? I can't find the post where I said that. Why are you repeating your excuse of "being confused" over and over again? All you have to do is read the first post of the game. You are now more than ever, number 2 on my scum list.
Better explanation on Double A, I'm now satisfied. As for the Pacman quote bit, didn't you just say that you were referring to DGB buddying up with you using the reasoning as Pacman's lurking?
Is your memory faulty, or was that a load of bull when you explained it to me?
populartajo wrote:Maybe I should post here more.
I will.
Please do.
zwetschenwasser wrote:I don't think Blood is helping much.
Go on.
ting =) wrote:qwints wrote:You don't like my vote, but you don't like my unvote? That makes a lot of sense.
Zomg. All this spinning is making me dizzy.
I don't like your vote because you just hopped on.
the whole post where qwints votes (minus quote) wrote:This
unvote, vote Jebus
I don't like your unvote because you just hopped off.
the whole post where qwints unvotes wrote:Thorough posts are not scummy. unvote
QFT
For Zwet - Just out of curiousity, who is on your scumlist?
For DGB - What was the reasoning behind your "These people are probably not God, and those possibly God?" list?
And for now,
Vote: qwints
- I like where this (to be) wagon is going, and Ting's 363 is a real kicker as well.
Bastard ModGod. Mislynch fodder. Suave savior.