Martyr Mafia - Game Over

pacman281292 · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:40 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:I'm not an active lurker. You just barely started actually playing this game. The only fluffing I've done was yesterday's craziness.

No; I meant the total nonsense one-liner.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:41 pm

Many of my one-liners have meaning, pacman, more meaning than you might care to admit.

ISO · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:50 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:Many of my one-liners have meaning, pacman, more meaning than you might care to admit.

i notice you say many not all. Care to point out which we should totally ignore?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:53 pm

My Fear ME and other useless trivialities.

Jebus · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:00 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:Many of my one-liners have meaning, pacman, more meaning than you might care to admit.

But it's choppy, and as I said, can be a task for me to decode without jumping to conclusions preemptively.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:05 pm

YAYZOWR!

pacman281292 · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:08 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:Many of my one-liners have meaning, pacman, more meaning than you might care to admit.

mm... unfortunately, I can't see it.
In many situations, your one-liners are distracting discussion, and they make us loss time.
Now, I'll stop this one-liner war.

Jahudo · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:22 pm

This still feels like alot of chatter. The Deadline is in 4 days people.

Everyone should restate the reason(s) they are voting for whoever. Everyone should start to think of second and third choices too because as of the last vote count we have 10 different people being voted.

I'm voting for Qwints because:
1. He's posting very infrequently in this game while posting much more often in other games.
2. He jumped on 3 wagons in three consecutive posts without adding any opinion of his own.
3. Post 497 looks like he's dismissing the Zakeri wagon only because "God wouldn't be the first one suspected". He doesn't give a reason for why this is probably and I don't see any reason why this is probable.
4. Post 516 he responded to a prod by making a baseless speculation on Jebus.

My backup choices are Zakeri, pacman, and Double A probably in that order.

Let's go! Chop chop!!

Jebus · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:46 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:YAYZOWR!

Your posts like this are seriously starting to piss me off. Please stop.

ISO · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:58 pm

Is it really that close to deadline already?!?! Unfortunately my computer curfew is now, so i can't actually make an official post. I'll have time tomorrow.

qwints · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:39 pm

Happy birthday Jahudo!

This game has been a lot messier than some of my others so I'm giving it less attention. I'm still pretty sure that Jebus knows who god actually is, but I'm in favor of killing annoying people.

vote: zwet

Indigo Heron · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:22 am

Couldn't you give more detail as to why you voted zwet besides him being 'annoying'?

Bloodmoney · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:43 am

zwet is obvcult and trying to be a distraction. Ignore him, he's no use to us.

xofelf gives opinions detailing only me and how scummy I've been, which other players would gladly call OMGUS. Luckily for her I believe that OMGUS is a fairytale. Nevertheless I'd like her to give something on everyone, if her time permits naturally, and I don't intend to be snippy, pretty please with sugar on top.

As for your points--I didn't ever get angry, I was trying to get some reactions. I accused people of being opportunistic because that's what they were, jumping to "obvious" conclusions and piggy-backing on others' sloppy points if they made or agreed with any points at all. I make up my mind about roles based on their actions, and

of course

I'm not gonna let them argue me out of it--they shouldn't be out to convince me this way or that, they should be out to find God. I change my mind based on their actions, not based on how good they argued against my accusation.

BTW qwints is the best lynch here.

pacman281292 · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:48 am

qwints wrote:Happy birthday Jahudo!

This game has been a lot messier than some of my others so I'm giving it less attention. I'm still pretty sure that Jebus knows who god actually is, but I'm in favor of killing annoying people.

vote: zwet

The only thing I agree here are:

Happy birthday Jahudo!

... and

vote: zwet

qwints, please explain why do you think Jebus knows who is god.
Also: don't intentionally dismiss the game. If you don't like it, tell the mod to relace you. Yeah, it's confusing. And messy. But I really like it

SilverPhoenix · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:38 am

qwints wrote:Happy birthday Jahudo!

This game has been a lot messier than some of my others so I'm giving it less attention. I'm still pretty sure that Jebus knows who god actually is, but
I'm in favor of killing annoying people.

vote: zwet

Sounds defeated to me. I don't like defeated. Not to mention that that lynching someone for being annoyed by him sounds idiotic, even close to deadline. There are plenty of better choices for the lynch, not limited to lurkers (pacman to some degree, yourself to a large degree), past suspects (Zakeri, Jebus) and finally emotional players in that order (myself, BM). Your vote looks more like a "I don't care, but I know this guy won't be lynched" vote, not a "this guy is scummy" vote. Make the latter.

Jahudo · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:39 am

qwints wrote:I'm still pretty sure that Jebus knows who god actually is

You've said this twice now. Can you elaborate on why you think this? Who do you think god is if you are assuming that Jebus knows who god is?

I don't like your reasoning for voting zwets. Why is god more likely to be an annoying poster?

mykonian · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:17 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:I don't like quotes. You don't have to. I'd just like an explanation excluding my crazy posts from yesterday which I regret.

simply that you have a way of attacking the persons that are protown, and make good posts now and then (jebus, bloodmoney... but not DGB?)

mykonian · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:22 am

Bloodmoney wrote:zwet is obvcult and trying to be a distraction. Ignore him, he's no use to us.

xofelf gives opinions detailing only me and how scummy I've been, which other players would gladly call OMGUS. Luckily for her I believe that OMGUS is a fairytale. Nevertheless I'd like her to give something on everyone, if her time permits naturally, and I don't intend to be snippy, pretty please with sugar on top.

As for your points--I didn't ever get angry, I was trying to get some reactions. I accused people of being opportunistic because that's what they were, jumping to "obvious" conclusions and piggy-backing on others' sloppy points if they made or agreed with any points at all. I make up my mind about roles based on their actions, and
of course
I'm not gonna let them argue me out of it--they shouldn't be out to convince me this way or that, they should be out to find God. I change my mind based on their actions, not based on how good they argued against my accusation.

BTW qwints is the best lynch here.

Great post, and I believe you are right. I think you could be right about lurking-qwints.

only, why would zwet be culted?

Jebus · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:14 pm

Bloodmoney wrote:zwet is obvcult and trying to be a distraction. Ignore him, he's no use to us.

zwet is scum, doubtlessly, but we can't conclude he's cult. Eg, what if he's god trying to seem cult?

Again, wifom to prove we can't be so jumpy to these conclusions.

qwints · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:37 pm

Jebus has constantly questioned people's cases for god whenever someone casts suspicion instead of refuting them. This indicates he's afraid of giving away too much information when adding on to these cases. Furthermore, he is too confident in his opinion of various players. I think he knows the cult leaders as well as god and is thus God.

Therefore,

unvote, vote Jebus

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:43 pm

!!! Can you say wishy-washiness please the town?

Unvote; Vote: quints

Jebus · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:09 pm

qwints wrote:Jebus has constantly questioned people's cases for god whenever someone casts suspicion instead of refuting them. This indicates he's afraid of giving away too much information when adding on to these cases. Furthermore, he is too confident in his opinion of various players. I think he knows the cult leaders as well as god and is thus God.

Therefore,
unvote, vote Jebus

Questioning strengthens cases - if a case can withstand general question, it holds moderate weight to say the least.

And it's not like I've only been shooting down cases, I've also been building some up.

X · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:24 pm

Jebus wrote:You're missing the point - I said that I play the same in a scum role as I would in a town role. This is normally a given, is it not?

Maybe you'd try to play the same, but you wouldn't actually play the same. If what you just said is true, then we should just randomly vote off people without analyzing play whatsoever.

mask man's 477 makes no sense.

quints wrote:EA's tunnel vision is unhelpful. There are a lot more players in the game than just Zakeri. Would God really have been the first player run up so fast?

I agree with the first two sentences. Not sure about the last one...but it's altogether possible.

pacman's 499 is pathetic, partially mitigated by 500.

Wait a second...I don't understand what mykonian & ortolan have against each other.

Double A wrote:I have a question:

If this is the first day, why is the discussion so deep, and why haven't we all jumped on to one bandwagon and voted for him? (or her)

Read some of these to get an idea of how we play mafia here.

Double A wrote:I know that you (Zwet) have a reason (sort of) to vote for me, but who the hell is X?

Thanks. Read.

al_kohaulec wrote:I don't know if this has ever been revealed to us or not (probably not), but do we know what happens if two cult leaders recruit the same player?

The third cult gets the recruit...it's in the CL Role PM.

SilverPhoenix wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:It's pointless to vote DGB. She's already the prime nightkill target.
Says who? God? <_<

My thoughts exactly.

xofelf's 628 is sort of an attack on playstyle...again I wish that he was using his main account.

Jahudo wrote:I don't see how SP "outed" himself as scum and I don't see how anyone could get to that interpretation from that quote.

QFT.

Jahudo wrote:The Deadline is in 4 days people.

ACK!

So I'll give 4 names: Jebus, pacman, Double A, and Bloodmoney.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:11 pm

Pretty sure the scum is stalling the godlynch.

ISO · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:17 pm

X wrote:xofelf's 628 is sort of an attack on playstyle...again I wish that he was using his main account.

wait...are you saying I'm someone's alt? because I'm not. I'm my own player and just a reminder for people who keep missing it, I'M A GIRL!!!
okay sorry about that...i'm just sick of being accused of being an alt and being called a guy.
Now if you'll give me a second, I'll make an official real post.