Mini 686 - Chess Mafia (Done)


User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #800 (ISO) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:50 am

Post by veerus »

Abstract Actuary wrote:Ok, looking at it. I'm fine trading away our bishop for their knight. Right now our top priority is safety. We achieve that mainly between development and repositioning our king. Be3 doesn't help us develop, whereas g3 does. I don't like our bishop on e2 as it suffocates our already vulnerable queen so I want to develop it to its right. g3 protects the pawn and moves to develop the f bishop.

Move: g3
Pretty much agrees with what I said. Since sirdanilot is undecided gives me more comfort that he and his scumpartner don't want this move played and all the more reason for me to

move: g3
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Indigo Heron
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Goon
Goon
Posts: 547
Joined: February 26, 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Post Post #801 (ISO) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:20 pm

Post by Indigo Heron »

My VAIO has run into several unexpected problems for a laptop of its stature (PC shuts down without warning!), so I am on indefinite V/LA (probably a week) while it is in the repair shop.

However, I do like my development of g3...so...

move: g3
最愛心。。。
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
Pond Scum
Posts: 2421
Joined: May 17, 2008
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #802 (ISO) » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:52 pm

Post by Goatrevolt »

Move g3


Definitely better than Be2, Be3, Qe3.
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #803 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:12 am

Post by sirdanilot »

I just don't see the merit of g3?
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #804 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:24 am

Post by Max »

Is that "lynch"?
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
User avatar
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
Friends Forever! <3
Posts: 800
Joined: November 16, 2007
Location: Australia (GMT +10)

Post Post #805 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:38 am

Post by Awesome Pants »

Max wrote:Is that "lynch"?
Yes.
[b]Currently being used By MafiaSSK for Chess Mafia. With all due permission from AP himself.[/b]
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
User avatar
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
Friends Forever! <3
Posts: 800
Joined: November 16, 2007
Location: Australia (GMT +10)

Post Post #806 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:40 am

Post by Awesome Pants »


Night Actions in ASAP.
[b]Currently being used By MafiaSSK for Chess Mafia. With all due permission from AP himself.[/b]
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
User avatar
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
Friends Forever! <3
Posts: 800
Joined: November 16, 2007
Location: Australia (GMT +10)

Post Post #807 (ISO) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:30 am

Post by Awesome Pants »

[b]Currently being used By MafiaSSK for Chess Mafia. With all due permission from AP himself.[/b]
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Abstract Actuary
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Goon
Goon
Posts: 442
Joined: October 11, 2007
Location: Chicago

Post Post #808 (ISO) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:26 am

Post by Abstract Actuary »

We have to move the Queen. e3, e2 and b3 are the only safe squares. At this point I can see some merit for each of them and at the same time none stand out as great moves. After Qe3 or Qe2 a knight move discover attacks the c2 pawn, while opening up the e-file for an attack on our queen/king. I'm not seeing anything particularly devastating, but it isn't good for us. For this reason, I'm leaning towards Qb3, despite it suffocating our queen.

Here are the boards.





User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #809 (ISO) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:28 pm

Post by veerus »

I like Qb3. It puts pressure on the b4 pawn and allows us to later play c3 to clear up some of the cluster on that side of the board. Plus it also gives us the option to play Bf3 which develops the white squared bishop while prompting another chance at an exchange.

Oh, and,
vote: sirdanilot
. My money's on him not really being useful in this day's discussion except to claim who's scum.. i.e. pretty much to continue what he's been doing most of the game.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Indigo Heron
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Indigo Heron
Goon
Goon
Posts: 547
Joined: February 26, 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Post Post #810 (ISO) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:50 am

Post by Indigo Heron »

@AA and veerus: Perhaps it would be best if you actually sat down and thought about the implications of Qb3. I see Qb3, for all its short-term gains, does us little benefit in the future. Qe3 may put us on the backfoot for a while, but eventually, Qe3 will prevail.
最愛心。。。
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Abstract Actuary
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Goon
Goon
Posts: 442
Joined: October 11, 2007
Location: Chicago

Post Post #811 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:56 am

Post by Abstract Actuary »

At this point I still favor Qb3. Our queen has less mobility, but it also adds pressure, defends our c pawn and is less vulnerable than on the open e-file.
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #812 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:26 am

Post by sirdanilot »

Why do we need to move the queen?

I love how veerus hasn't even bothered to read my defense against him. oh wait why would scum do that. veerus, if you want to enter the mafia phase, do it good or just don't do it.
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #813 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:35 pm

Post by veerus »

I don't see any gains.. it's a passive move that doesn't accomplish anything except to lock our queen in with our own pawns and, theoretically, put it on a collision course with a possible pin in the e-file in a couple moves. In fact, as long as the king isn't castled, I'd like for the queen to stay away from the e-file.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
Pond Scum
Posts: 2421
Joined: May 17, 2008
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #814 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:42 pm

Post by Goatrevolt »

Qe2 looks to be the worst option.

As for Qe3 and Qb3, I need to look through each variation, but Qb3 looks better to me at first glance.
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Abstract Actuary
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Goon
Goon
Posts: 442
Joined: October 11, 2007
Location: Chicago

Post Post #815 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:39 am

Post by Abstract Actuary »

sirdanilot wrote:Why do we need to move the queen?
They are threatening Nf2 or Nxg3.
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #816 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:19 am

Post by sirdanilot »

? the g3 square is protected. So is f2. I can see it threatening Nxd2 though. Why don't we move the Bd2 somewhere instead.

wow I should have replaced out of this game... but oh well I am here now so I'll just try to do what I can. I am not replacing out, that would be lame.
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Goatrevolt
Pond Scum
Pond Scum
Posts: 2421
Joined: May 17, 2008
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #817 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:34 pm

Post by Goatrevolt »

sirdanilot wrote:? the g3 square is protected. So is f2. I can see it threatening Nxd2 though. Why don't we move the Bd2 somewhere instead
The reason we need to move our queen is because of the "discovered" attack on the queen from black's bishop when they move the knight. For example, if black moves Nxg3, then they are attacking the rook with their knight and also attacking the queen with their bishop at the same time. We'd have to move the queen so we don't lose it to the bishop, but we would end up losing our rook for free to the knight in return.
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #818 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:34 am

Post by sirdanilot »

Ah ok now I get it.

Qe3 is better. Unlike what veerus-scum is trying to indoctrinate into our brains, Qb3 is clearly not the best option. It does not put any pressure on any pawn; a simple ...a5 will suffice to lock the queen up. Qe2 puts the queen too far back, meaning Qe3 will get my vote.

move: Qe3
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Abstract Actuary
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Abstract Actuary
Goon
Goon
Posts: 442
Joined: October 11, 2007
Location: Chicago

Post Post #819 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:28 am

Post by Abstract Actuary »

Move: Qb3
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #820 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:40 am

Post by Max »

If we move to E3 they'll probably move to g5, followed by us a bishop to C3 then they move their knight to C5 (if they're following optimal strategy), then we'll move bishop to d3. It gives us a bishop and a knight at most, overall a disappointing plan.
User avatar
veerus
veerus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
veerus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1050
Joined: May 16, 2008

Post Post #821 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:20 am

Post by veerus »

sirdanilot wrote:Ah ok now I get it.

Qe3 is better. Unlike what veerus-scum is trying to indoctrinate into our brains, Qb3 is clearly not the best option. It does not put any pressure on any pawn; a simple ...a5 will suffice to lock the queen up. Qe2 puts the queen too far back, meaning Qe3 will get my vote.

move: Qe3
Says the guy who didn't even realize we needed to move the queen in the first place.

move: Qb3


It's really the only option that makes any sense in this position.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
-Fight Club
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
User avatar
User avatar
Awesome Pants
Friends Forever! <3
Friends Forever! <3
Posts: 800
Joined: November 16, 2007
Location: Australia (GMT +10)

Post Post #822 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:08 am

Post by Awesome Pants »

Vote Count
Moves

Qb3 (2)-veerus,Abstract Actuary
Qe3 (1)-sirdanilot

People

sirdanilot (1)-veerus
[b]Currently being used By MafiaSSK for Chess Mafia. With all due permission from AP himself.[/b]
User avatar
sirdanilot
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sirdanilot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2657
Joined: October 5, 2006
Location: The Netherlands

Post Post #823 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:24 pm

Post by sirdanilot »

Max wrote:If we move to E3 they'll probably move to g5, followed by us a bishop to C3 then they move their knight to C5 (if they're following optimal strategy), then we'll move bishop to d3. It gives us a bishop and a knight at most, overall a disappointing plan.
Then prove to me how Qb3 is less disappointing.

Yes veerus, I did not realize that we had to move the queen. That is simply because of lack of chess experience and temporal inability to find out the logic why we need to move it. However, the fact that I am now trying to put my thoughts out there, despite my ignorance of chess, should have put me on your townie list a long, long time ago, because this is not the first time I've tried to do this.
Never have I pretended to know more about chess than anyone here.
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
The Central Scrutinizer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3100
Joined: August 18, 2006
Location: Illinois

Post Post #824 (ISO) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:14 am

Post by The Central Scrutinizer »

Checking in to see if I was replaced or not... the first post is unclear.
"You might very well think that; I couldn't
possibly
comment."

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”