My problem is that in my experience, I can't do things in a small way; when I defend myself, I defend zealously, when I attack someone I attack zealously, and when I try to rectify my mistakes, I do so zealously enough to be a scumtell in its own right. Read Election Mafia '08 if you have any doubts about the seriousness of this statement.Ojanen wrote: Regards to the overreacting I just find it peculiar that you're not trying to control it when you think yourself that it's a scumtell in your play. But I guess this applies whether you're scum or town, just strange this seemingly deliberately letting something you're cognizant of hinder your play in other players' eyes.
And Hero's defensiveness was, if I remember correctly, of a such remarkably more subtle variety than yours that it kinda confirmed to me that you can quite sensitively assess this.
Regards to replacement voting, see I think it's perfectly ok to vote for a replacement on the original persons (de)merits. If there's a stain in the playerslot's actions it will stay there regardless of person changing. Of course you can't get explanations but if someone thinks the stain is scummy enough, more than just worthy of some probing, I say vote away.
I agree, it would be bad for me to just ignore this problem, but unless I deal with it very, very, very, very gradually, I'm going to screw up and get lynched, no matter my alignment.
As for the replacement voting, I suppose that's just a difference of opinion. As far as Day 1 goes, I'd rather give replacements a clean slate to start out on, rather than hound them before they fully understand what's going on in the game.
I'm not voting because I honestly don't know who to vote for right now. I have no leads beyond Wall-E and Sajin, and both are fully spent already. Maybe I'm subconsciously waiting for someone to make a scummy statement, maybe I'm just confused. I can't think clearly at the moment.