Scien: 1 (xRECKONERx)
Not Voting: 4 (Papa Zito, Henrz, Scien, MiteyMouse)
Oh really? Sounds like another inconsistency to me.Reckoner wrote:Also you were never my chief suspect.
Reckoner wrote:I'd be more comfortable with a lynch on you over anyone else at this moment [...]
I'm not ignoring it. You said in your own words:Reckoner wrote:LIKE I SAID BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING
Reckoner wrote:If Santos flips cop, Scien's ass is mine.
Reckoner wrote:FoS MiteyMouse & Henrz.
In that order even. Yes, you have suspicions on the other two, but my position on that list went from not even on it, to being WAY more suspicious than the two on it. In the space of a post.Reckoner wrote:In fact, while I definitely still have my doubts about Henrz and MiteyMouse, I'd be more comfortable with a lynch on you over anyone else at this moment[...]
I have a fairly strong protown read from PapaZ, as I have had for most the game. Which means that I believe that the scum are among Henrz, Reckoner, and MiteyMouse. Order is difficult. I would have to say:Reckoner wrote:I want scumlists now. From everyone.
Holy crap you scared me.xRECKONERx wrote:Ugh. Fine.
Unvote.
Compliance!xRECKONERx wrote:I want scumlists now. From everyone.
MiteyMouse wrote:So my suspect list is Reckoner and Papa Zito but, followed closely by Hernz. I think that the Scum are withen these 3 players...I'm just not sure which 2.
Two of you have xRECKONERx on top of your lists, which worries me because he's not high on mine. Can I get a case for this please?Scien wrote:Order is difficult. I would have to say:
Reckoner, Henrz, Mitey in that order.
Eh. Mine is spread over the last two pages, but I'll reiterate. I'm thinking I need to take a step back and make sure everything that I am thinking makes sense anyway, and this will help me out a bit.PapaZ wrote:Two of you have xRECKONERx on top of your lists, which worries me because he's not high on mine. Can I get a case for this please?
Yes, I did say that... I said I was going to be all over you, as in investigate the fuck out of you, WHICH I HAVEN'T HAD TIME TO DO YET.Scien wrote: 1) Yesterday, very quick to subscribe to Santos' logic, and ended up being the hammer vote. After which he said that he was going to be all over me today if Santos flipped cop.
It wasn't an entire list. And don't call it a meme.2) Early today, before Henrz poped up, no one had be pimping the either Santos or Scien meme that seemed popular late yesterday. He comes in and gives what I thought was a FoS list, that just included Mitey and Henrz.
To tell you the truth I didn't even read that. I just saw you calling me out and immediately began to respond. I was skimming the topic and didn't have time to read every little thing. As far as I knew, Henrz was just saying that we didn't need to throw out EVERYTHING Santos said, as was suggested.3) Henrz comes back, says that he still thinks some of Santos' ideas hold water.
4) Next post of Reckoner's has me in his sights, says that I am a even bigger suspect than the two he mentioned at day start. I saw this as an inconsistancy, and pressured about it.
Just keep twisting it, please. I jumped on quickly. Read that we should FoS, not vote. I FoS Henrz & Mitey. My condition at the end of the day yesterday was that I would go on the offensive against you if Santos flipped cop. He did. I've had shit to do today, apologies for5) We fight forever, I think I see a few more inconsistencies in there. Among them, him backtracking and saying that I was a suspect all along, even though I was missing from his initial list today. Him claiming that I was not his biggest suspect, even though he would like to have me lynched before the other two (which BTW makes no sense).
YOU WEREN'T ON THE LIST BECAUSE I HADN'T PAID ENOUGH ATTENTION TO YOU YET.Just answer me this question Reckoner. Why was I not on that initial list? Are you saying that I was implied to be on that list? You never officially FoSed me until later today... at least I don't think. While I am taking a step back, where do you think that I failed to see a point of yours?
Score! :p Anyway onto proper stuff.Henrz: My case against him was well documented on D2, but he's toned it down a bit since then, and has dropped a few places on my radar.
Well you should've really... Seeing as you were supposed to... Nevermind, but you should've.Reckoner wrote: YOU WEREN'T ON THE LIST BECAUSE I HADN'T PAID ENOUGH ATTENTION TO YOU YET.
This made my eye twitch. Moving on...Henrz wrote:Score!Henrz: My case against him was well documented on D2, but he's toned it down a bit since then, and has dropped a few places on my radar.
Do the numbers themselves have significance? Two #2s?Henrz wrote: My list:
1) Reckoner...
2) Scien
2) Papa \Z/
4) Mitey
9) Henrz :p
Here's where things get weird. If xRECKONERx and Scien are your chief suspects, why aren't they your top pair? That doesn't make any sense.Henrz wrote: Right here's the possible Scum partners in order of possibleness:
Joint first! Reckoner and Papa, and Scien and Papa!
Wat. If I'm neutral then I'm not scum, right? So why am I in your top two scum teams?Henrz wrote:(Your in both Papa because your kinda neutral)
You've got Mitey in all three of these scenarios, yet she ranks as most pro-town (excluding yourself) on your list. Wha?Henrz wrote: 2) Reckoner and Mitey.
3) Sicen and Mitey
5) Papa and Mitey
1000?Henrz wrote:1000) Reckoner and Scien
Again... then why are they your top suspects?Henrz wrote:That's my ideas I was thinking at the end of day one that Reckoner and Scien are partners... But I doubt that very much now.
xRECKONERx wrote:@Henrz: Do you not find Mitey's lurking theleastbit suspicious?
I can't tell you how scummy this statement is.Henrz wrote:Of course I do, but She's not the flavour of the moment is she? Anyways Nighty night.
I'm drooling in anticipation of this one.Scien wrote:I think Mitey's case on Reckoner will help me get a better feel for her.
Let's hear our xRECKONERx case, Mitey. I'm also really, really curious to hear your case on me.MiteyMouse wrote:1) Reckoner
2) Papa Zito
3) Henrz
[1]Whoops, sorry I meant to have Reckoner and Scien at the top, not you and Scien joint 2nd, sorry about that, and yes, they do have significance.Papa Zito wrote:This made my eye twitch. Moving on...Henrz wrote:Score!Henrz: My case against him was well documented on D2, but he's toned it down a bit since then, and has dropped a few places on my radar.
[1]Do the numbers themselves have significance? Two #2s?Henrz wrote: My list:
1) Reckoner...
2) Scien
2) Papa \Z/
4) Mitey
9) Henrz :p
[2]Here's where things get weird. If xRECKONERx and Scien are your chief suspects, why aren't they your top pair? That doesn't make any sense.Henrz wrote: Right here's the possible Scum partners in order of possibleness:
Joint first! Reckoner and Papa, and Scien and Papa!
[3]Wat. If I'm neutral then I'm not scum, right? So why am I in your top two scum teams?Henrz wrote:(Your in both Papa because your kinda neutral)
[4]You've got Mitey in all three of these scenarios, yet she ranks as most pro-town (excluding yourself) on your list. Wha?Henrz wrote: 2) Reckoner and Mitey.
3) Sicen and Mitey
5) Papa and Mitey
[4]1000?Henrz wrote:1000) Reckoner and Scien
[5]Again... then why are they your top suspects?Henrz wrote:That's my ideas I was thinking at the end of day one that Reckoner and Scien are partners... But I doubt that very much now.
xRECKONERx wrote:@Henrz: Do you not find Mitey's lurking theleastbit suspicious?[6]I can't tell you how scummy this statement is.Henrz wrote:Of course I do, but She's not the flavour of the moment is she? Anyways Nighty night.
[7]I am all for a Henrz lynch at this point. If we're playing pairs: I'm totally seeing a Henrz/MiteyMouse pair.
Okay then.Henrz wrote:[1]Whoops, sorry I meant to have Reckoner and Scien at the top, not you and Scien joint 2nd, sorry about that, and yes, they do have significance.
I'd like to hear your reasoning behind this, please. Are you ruling out a Scien/xRECKONERx pair based on today's argument between them? If so, do you not recognize that they may have decided to distance themselves from each other while talking during Night 2?Henrz wrote:[2]It's basically, I do think they are the most suspicious people, but if one's scum, I doubt very much that the other is.
I... you... wat. Let's break this down.Henrz wrote:[3]Your in both the top scum teams, not because you are the top suspect, but because you are the most suspicious, but more suspicious than Mitey, and you're neutral, sort of, on both subjects.
Okay. Extremely.Henrz wrote:[6]Please tell me how scummy this statement is.
Well, obviously.Henrz wrote:[7]Your opinion... Though I don't agree with my lynch :p
You're surprised?xRECKONERx wrote:Um. Mitey hasn't given us a case yet.
If I'm her #1 suspect, she'd better have a case against me. Though, if I had to guess, I'd say she's actually scum and was parroting on the "RECK IS SCUM" bandwagon to make herself look pro-town.Henrz wrote:She has a case against you?