Mini 797: Poof! Mafia. Game Over!

ZazieR · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 am

orangepenguin wrote:
ZazieR wrote:
OP wrote:Right now, if it were night, I would go with Zaz or Pesco. But since I have claimed, I will listen to the town, whether they want me to shoot (and if so, who to shoot) or not.
Why?
And I don't like it when a kill gets discussed in the game, as it gives the scum information who will be hit and if they should worry about it or not.

Also, have you used the 'too townie' 'argument' in another game before? If so, link(s)?
Well, okay, so if the town told me to shoot someone that I disagree with, I probably wouldn't listen, since scum could easily influence and direct me. But if they really wanted me NOT to shoot, I would listen, since I see the town do that a lot, to test the claimed vig and if they'll listen to the town. I have problem with that. If you guys want me not to kill, I won't, maybe, but I will probably shoot whomever I believe is scum.

See bolded.
Also, I'm against discussing in the game what you should do.

ZazieR · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:45 am

orangepenguin wrote:I am pretty sure whoever is the shredder is the SK though.

Eraser makes me thing of one of those pink erasers = office supplies.

What else is in an office?

A paper shredder.

I am assuming the shredder is the SK because it is more similar to erasing (the vig role) than the unraveling..

Kast was a Mafia Plumber? I assume he plumbs people somehow. I have no idea what that means though.

There was someone else who was unravelled. What would that refer to? As process of elimination, I am assuming this is the mafia kill. Do plumbers unravel? Plumbers fix things, so what kind of mafia role would that correlate to?

..countess of your hamlet, forbiddanlight, to decide what should be done in this situation. Being a little crazy, she suggests you all lynch people til the bad guys die.
What does Countess of our Hamlet MEAN? Judging from the opening flavor, it does seem to indicate FL is a player. Since it makes several references to lynching the bad guys, does that mean fl =good?

No, it doesn't indicate that FL is a player.

ZazieR · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:02 am

@hp
What do you think of OP's vig claim?

ZazieR · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:11 am

orangepenguin wrote:Maybe I am. Or I could be right on top of everything, and you're scum trying to misdirect me.

Shouldn't you know if you are or not? So why add the first part?
And do you think hp is scum trying to msidirect you, or not?

ZazieR · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:13 am

Pesco47 wrote:
orangepenguin wrote:Well, okay, so if the town told me to shoot someone that I disagree with, I probably wouldn't listen, since scum could easily influence and direct me. But if they really wanted me NOT to shoot, I would listen, since I see the town do that a lot, to test the claimed vig and if they'll listen to the town. I have problem with that. If you guys want me not to kill, I won't, maybe, but I will probably shoot whomever I believe is scum.
You sound just like Xyl-SKum did in UT Mafia, obvSKum.

An explanation of this statement would be nice.

ZazieR · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:25 am

forbiddanlight wrote:
Mod Note: And the votes haven't changed. I probably could have found a better trope. You only have 6 days to get lynching, yanno.

Oh, come on >.< One of us wants to let you enjoi some rope, and you actually are complaining? Pfft, talk about ungrateful

Well, you see, one of you wanting that isn't anywhere near enough. And it's boring to do a votecount I can't mess up (providing I didn't mess up the previous one)

ZazieR · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:35 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:I think MafiaSSK is scum because of his opportunistic twisting of your earlier case into something that it's not, then ignoring the fact that it doesn't make any sense.

So why no vote?

ZazieR · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:35 am

orangepenguin wrote:
Vote: Pesco
for reasons stated earlier.

Which ones?

ZazieR · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:38 am

hp [leaves] wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:Ah yes, I forgot why I suspected pesco...
Unvote
Proof that zwet is scum.

How?

ZazieR · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:39 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:There are worse things than death...

I don't understand this comment

Pesco47 · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:01 am

Xyl wrote:
StarangerCoug wrote:
Xyl wrote:Anyone who is considered scum by the entire town must be considered scum by the scum too, which means that they probably aren't actually scum. Your plan is even worse than mine.

I'll be happy to take advice on who should die but I'll make the final call.
At this point I want
YOU
to die. You can't give an actual defense for your actions, and you're trying to shift attention elsewhere.

If you don't want me to blow you and potentially anybody in the way (yes, I've been warned about that) to smithereens, then I want you to answer the following for me:

1. Do you think there was enough reasoning by page 4 to get rid of a player?
2. Do you think Budja should have been allowed to defend himself?
3. Did it come to your mind that Budja could have been asleep or someplace where he couldn't get online?
4. And last, but not least, why should we decide for you who is scummy?
You seem to be misinterpreting here

I decided to kill someone so I killed the player who was scummiest

Link
Underlined part is the tell.

hp [leaves] · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:32 am

ZazieR wrote:
hp [leaves] wrote:
Jebus wrote:I doubt FL is in the game as a killing faction as well, though definitely in the game.
Then why are you not voting FL?
Why would you vote somebody of whom you don't think that that player has a killing role?

Misread x_x

About zwet, not caring about a game is a scumtell.

About OP, I don't believe his claim; but it is verifiable. If he's actually the vig, cool. But if he is mafia or SK, the opposing faction will take care of him pretty well.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:57 am

ZazieR wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:There are worse things than death...
I don't understand this comment

He probably means the faded to blue thing.

hasdgfas · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:58 am

hp wrote:About OP, I don't believe his claim; but it is verifiable. If he's actually the vig, cool. But if he is mafia or SK, the opposing faction will take care of him pretty well.

I'm confused. Won't he be taken care of no matter what he is? So why is it "cool" that he's the vig? Not to mention his completely unnecessary claim.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:13 am

ZazieR wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:There are worse things than death...
I don't understand this comment

Figures.

ZazieR · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:19 am

hasdgfas wrote:
hp wrote:About OP, I don't believe his claim; but it is verifiable. If he's actually the vig, cool. But if he is mafia or SK, the opposing faction will take care of him pretty well.
I'm confused. Won't he be taken care of no matter what he is? So why is it "cool" that he's the vig? Not to mention his completely unnecessary claim.

this

ZazieR · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:20 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:
ZazieR wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:There are worse things than death...
I don't understand this comment
Figures.

What do you mean this time?

MafiaSSK · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:31 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:
ZazieR wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:There are worse things than death...
I don't understand this comment
Figures.

So you don't bother to explain?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:27 am

It's self-explanatory.

ZazieR · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:30 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:It's self-explanatory.

No, it's not.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:31 am

Yes, it is.

ZazieR · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:32 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:Yes, it is.

Just explain it.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:33 am

ZazieR · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:35 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:No.

Any reason why?

MafiaSSK · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:00 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:No.

Then, you're scum. You should explain so that you don't hurt the town.