Visible Votecount
-Empking (3): Gorrad, Kast, sirdanilot
-Kast (1): Empking
-AceMarksman (1): Riceballtail
-killa seven (1): ortolan
Not voting (4): killa seven, ZEEnon, caf19, AceMarksman
With 10 alive it takes 6 real votes to lynch.
@Ort-
Kast RE: Empking in the other game wrote:@Empking-
You are also posting very sparsely and you are only posting when directly addressed. Please share more thoughts with us.
Kast RE: Empking in a much longer post wrote:Of your the 15 posts that you made at the time you proclaimed that I was stifling discussion, 9 of them were responses to me, 4 were responses to PhilyEc, 1 was a response to Zwet, and one was your confirmation post.
You did not have a single thought to add to the entire game that was not an reply to someone.
Kast Summary on Empking wrote:Empking
Very scummy playstyle. Quick to take things out of context, very poor logic. Low interest in finding scum, seems much more concerned with deflecting attention/suspicion. Also is inconsistent with his stated beliefs.
Playstyle discourages discussion as he tends to attack those who address him and claims it is scummy to reply to a post that does not address you before the addressee replies.
Uses craplogic to claim that doing so prevents the addressee from speaking.
Uses craplogic to argue that Kast is stifling discussion.
Uses craplogic to argue that Kast is strawmanning.
Seems too obvious to be scum (too scummy to be scum?). Also, Zwet claimed that this is standard Empking MO even as a townie. I would hate to give a pass to this, but I also don't want to ignore the metagame data.
Right now you are at the top of my list for lack of information. I would be happy with lynching you.
-Address points in my post 256. Listing them would make this far longer than necessary.
-Can you link to previous games where you demonstrated similar disregard for logic or consistency (or where other players accused you of that behavior)?
Post with analysis of game when Empking was a townie wrote:@Empking-
You have two votes in the count and an additional 2 players who have expressed willingness to vote for you but are waiting to allow replacements to join, read, and catch up.
Looked through some of your past games and I only found one finished game where you were a townie (there's probably more but I didn't have much time and the first 6 I saw you were scum, it would be great if you can link to something). You demonstrate similarly terse posting style, use of false dilemmas, and quoting out of context/misrepresenting other players posts.
One big difference I see between that game and this one is that you actively searched for and attacked what you thought were mistakes and scum tells. You do not exhibit the same reactive posting style that you have demonstrated here.