CancerBottle (2) ChannelDelibird, crazypianist
Kichirou (1) Kard8p3
Kard8p3 (1) dothefandango
crazypianist1116 (1) FoShizzle
Not voting (1) FatedLunar
With 9 alive, 5 to lynch.
I gave my reason. I don't want this to be a bandwagon vote. Why not let the person decide between two equally guilty (in our eyes at this point) dudes instead of kicking one off just because he has more votes? Stir up the pot. Seems like it's working .crazypianist1116 wrote:Way to be foolish. Give a reason ALWAYS!
Yay activity!crazypianist1116 wrote:
CancerBottle: If you're so concerned about ChannelDelibird being at L-2, then revoke your vote. The other 2 will surely fall as they had no reasons. You should give a reason for keeping your vote. Originally it was (pretty much) random. Additionally, I don't feel like CDB's posts have put any suspicion on Kard. CDB isn't attacking Kard, he's defending himself against Kard's FoS. Since someone accused me for not voting originally, I'll cast a vote now. Vote: CancerBottle
ChannelDelibird wrote:crazypianist, FatedLunar, dothefandango and FoShizzle: what do you think of the fact that I currently have three votes?
That’s why I put quotation marks around the random part, it wasn’t random, although I was trying to note it was an early vote that wasn’t meant to be taken completely seriously. It’s mostly a gut thing. As newb mafia I was afraid to random vote at the beginning of the game, even when someone else did. And I said the same thing about “observing first” before voting that you are saying now. My vote will stay on you until I find a better suspect.crazypianist1116 wrote:FoShizzle: That's not much of a random vote since you have a reason. I prefer to observe first and then give my observations.
I've always seen FoS's as a somewhat alert to "I think you may be scummy. I want you to explain why you did this." They don't have the same influence as votes. Now that DTF answered my suspicions I'd unFoS him but who really does that?FoShizzle wrote:To clarify on my scummy vibes on pianist.... pianist's FOS of fandango for not giving a reason for a vote, seems.... fake. like why not just ask fandango what his reason was without FOSing? You really suspicious of him for that? I have a hard time voicing why my scumdar is going off, but it is.
My suspicion of CBD is evaporating because two other players added their votes to the wagon. I don't like the way he interpreted Kard's suspicions.FoShizzle wrote: CancerBottle, if you found CDB scummy, how come your suspicion of him is suddenly “evaporating” so quickly?
Well, their votes forced me to explain my actions. Now that I don't have the opportunity to expose any more quick lynchers, I might as well keep my suspicion of CBD public and grill his third voter: Bgg1996.FoShizzle wrote:CancerBottle, is your vote change being influenced by the votes from pianist and fandango?
I wish I understood that...CancerBottle wrote:Well, their votes forced me to explain my actions. Now that I don't have the opportunity to expose any more quick lynchers, I might as well keep my suspicion of CBD public and grill his third voter: Bgg1996.FoShizzle wrote:CancerBottle, is your vote change being influenced by the votes from pianist and fandango?
So yes, my vote chance is a direct result of their votes.
I wish you would post more...Kichirou wrote:I wish I understood that...CancerBottle wrote:Well, their votes forced me to explain my actions. Now that I don't have the opportunity to expose any more quick lynchers, I might as well keep my suspicion of CBD public and grill his third voter: Bgg1996.FoShizzle wrote:CancerBottle, is your vote change being influenced by the votes from pianist and fandango?
So yes, my vote chance is a direct result of their votes.
Oh. Sorry.ChannelDelibird wrote:It's CDB, CancerBottle, not CBD. Sorry for the pedantry.
I don't know if I'm "enthusiastically" pushing you to claim. I am playing this game with more fervor than I usually might, this being my first game at this site. Anyway, I thought you were scummy. But right now, you're not nearly as scummy as I initially thought you were. That's because Kich and Bgg1996 placed you at L-2. Kichirou says his vote was random. Bgg1996 stated he though you were "suspicious." He has not elaborated yet. Obviously you feel no need to claim, so I thought my vote would do more if I placed it on someone who put you at L-2 for no adequately explained reason.CDB wrote wrote: I'm a little distressed that CB is talking enthusiastically about the possibility of someone 'forcing' me to claim, considering that there's very little, if any, evidence against me that I can see. The fact that he then moved his vote to Bgg does not sit well with me either - though I agree that it would be good to hear an elaboration from Bgg I don't like that CB is playing both sides of my wagon.
Love you too.CDB wrote wrote: Vote stands.
CancerBottle wrote:I just think it was a reach to suggest that. I don't think anyone here would actually accuse you of intentionally playing poorly in one game to gain a tenuous advantage in another.ChannelDelibird wrote:EBWOP: This point might be stronger if I was voting for Kard right now, but I'm not. My motivation for discussing this in the first place was a) to defend myself against a FoS and b) to defend my integrity as a player my making it clear I wouldn't intentionally play any less than my best game in past games in order to gain an advantage now...rather than trying to put suspicion on Kard.
Then again, because it's so absurd, that might be why my thinking is faulty.
But, I would like to hear what other players have to say on the issue.
Careful, he said that CDB'sCancerBottle wrote:Well Kichirou has claimed his vote was random, while Bgg1996 states he voted for CBD because he was"suspicious."