12Keyblade - 1 (reverendpsycho)
reverendpsycho - 1 (12Keyblade)
TheFlyingGreenMonkey - 2 (KittyMo, geekalicious)
Not Voting - 3 (BlueRaven, Krauthammer, ronnieroo)
Kitty's on there twice. She has 2 votes on her.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:Official Vote Count
12Keyblade - 1 (reverendpsycho)
KittyMo - 1 (xRECKONERx)
reverendpsycho - 1 (12Keyblade)
TheFlyingGreenMonkey - 2 (KittyMo, geekalicious)
KittyMo - 1 (TheFlyingGreenMonkey)
Not Voting - 3 (BlueRaven, Krauthammer, ronnieroo)
5 to Lynch.is the end of Wednesday, July 22 (Eastern, GMT - 4).Deadline
I don't completely see how I was taking quotes out of context... ronnieroo pointed out a contradiction that I agree with. Therefore, I put my vote behind it. And as I note, 12keyblade did indeed place the finger of suspicion on TheFlyingGreenMonkey later. That doesn't really sound like a stretch of words to me.TheReverendPsycho wrote:ronnieroo simply noted a contradiction and brought it to our attention. You decided to run with this and KittyMo's accusation and bandwagon FGM. While I'm not saying FGM is scum, yet, taking two people's post out of context and using it to support your bandwagon vote is looking VERY scummy to me. FoS: geekalicious
@the 2nd quote block, seems like sound logic. However, while we need to lynch day one, I reiterate that it must be backed with reasonable suspicion, not just blindly jumping on a bandwagon. At this point, I don't think we are at that point.
However, later on when 12Keyblade voted for you, you said,TheReverendPsycho wrote:VOTE: 12Keyblade
For holding up the start of the game.
How can you say that tossing the finger at TheFlyingGreenMonkey for confirming last is awkward (though, the finger actually seemed to be pointed for his suspicious voting habits) when at the beginning of the day, you cited that as your random voting logic for aiming at 12Keyblade?TheReverendPsycho wrote:OMGUS vote. Hmm...possibly attempting to make this vote "look" random. Also, tossing the finger at FGM about him being the last one to confirm seems awkward.
This was my logic for the FOS. It was after his vote for a No Lynch.12Keyblade wrote: I will place an FOS: TheFlyingGreenMonkey for not wanting to lynch on D1, thereby (in my eyes) giving Mafia a free kill. I don't want to put him at L-2 on Page 2. Yet.
Can you please stop screwing with the game? It's important to play to win. Unless you're frustrated scum, we'd really appreciate it if you would not self-vote. If you're scum, go ahead and just keep doing what you're doing.TheFlyingGreenMonkey wrote:Unovote Vote:TheFlyingGreenMonkey
Okay, this is very, very skummy to me. You post one no content post and then come back just to put the third vote on a possible bandwagon, on your own admission? If you're going to vote for KittyMo, explain why, not just because of a blatant jokevote and a blatant OMGUS?BlueRaven wrote:just cus im going with the crowd:
Vote: KittyMo
BlueRaven, voting for another player and placing them at L-2 without any other justification than just going with the crowd is looking like an awfully scummy thing to do to me. Additionally, I've noted that you're the person with the least amount of commentary in the game thus far. Though I'm still watching TheFlyingGreenMonkey, I'm going to change my vote.BlueRaven wrote:just cus im going with the crowd:
Vote: KittyMo
Three things:TheFlyingGreenMonkey wrote:Unovote Vote:TheFlyingGreenMonkey