Newbie 810 - Game over!

Vel-Rahn Koon · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:28 am

Official Vote Count

12Keyblade - 1 (reverendpsycho)

KittyMo - 2 (xRECKONERx, TheFlyingGreenMonkey)

reverendpsycho - 1 (12Keyblade)
TheFlyingGreenMonkey - 2 (KittyMo, geekalicious)

Not Voting - 3 (BlueRaven, Krauthammer, ronnieroo)

5 to Lynch.

Deadline

is the end of Wednesday, July 22 (Eastern, GMT - 4).

12Keyblade · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:29 am

Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:
Official Vote Count

12Keyblade - 1 (reverendpsycho)
KittyMo - 1 (xRECKONERx)
reverendpsycho - 1 (12Keyblade)

TheFlyingGreenMonkey - 2 (KittyMo, geekalicious)

KittyMo - 1 (TheFlyingGreenMonkey)

Not Voting - 3 (BlueRaven, Krauthammer, ronnieroo)

5 to Lynch.
Deadline
is the end of Wednesday, July 22 (Eastern, GMT - 4).

Kitty's on there twice. She has 2 votes on her.

Thanks, fixed

geekalicious · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:23 am

TheReverendPsycho wrote:ronnieroo simply noted a contradiction and brought it to our attention. You decided to run with this and KittyMo's accusation and bandwagon FGM. While I'm not saying FGM is scum, yet, taking two people's post out of context and using it to support your bandwagon vote is looking VERY scummy to me. FoS: geekalicious

@the 2nd quote block, seems like sound logic. However, while we need to lynch day one, I reiterate that it must be backed with reasonable suspicion, not just blindly jumping on a bandwagon. At this point, I don't think we are at that point.

I don't completely see how I was taking quotes out of context... ronnieroo pointed out a contradiction that I agree with. Therefore, I put my vote behind it. And as I note, 12keyblade did indeed place the finger of suspicion on TheFlyingGreenMonkey later. That doesn't really sound like a stretch of words to me.

Additionally, the purpose behind the vote wasn't to start an unjustified bandwagon (though, I must say, I don't think two votes is even really deserving of the title bandwagon at this point). I also wanted TheFlyingGreenMonkey to know how scummy the actions and lack of rationalization for his actions appeared to me. Perhaps pointing a FOS would have been better, but at this point, I'm still not quite satisfied with his explanation of not knowing the rules and roles of this particular variation which were posted by the mod at the very beginning of the thread to stop confusion like that, so my vote will stand for now.

geekalicious · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:05 am

Sorry to double post, but I just noted something else I wanted to ask about. At the beginning of the game, TheReverendPsycho, you put this up:

TheReverendPsycho wrote:VOTE: 12Keyblade

For holding up the start of the game.

However, later on when 12Keyblade voted for you, you said,

TheReverendPsycho wrote:OMGUS vote. Hmm...possibly attempting to make this vote "look" random. Also, tossing the finger at FGM about him being the last one to confirm seems awkward.

How can you say that tossing the finger at TheFlyingGreenMonkey for confirming last is awkward (though, the finger actually seemed to be pointed for his suspicious voting habits) when at the beginning of the day, you cited that as your random voting logic for aiming at 12Keyblade?

12Keyblade · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:37 am

12Keyblade wrote: I will place an FOS: TheFlyingGreenMonkey for not wanting to lynch on D1, thereby (in my eyes) giving Mafia a free kill. I don't want to put him at L-2 on Page 2. Yet.

This was my logic for the FOS. It was after his vote for a No Lynch.

12Keyblade · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:37 am

Ah crap.

Mod: Fix tags pleaseums?

Done

xRECKONERx · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:07 am

Not trying to stifle discussion at all.. I just don't think it's always a player's place to respond to every last detail in the game unless specifically asked to do so. Also, I'd like Psycho to respond to exactly how geek was taking the quotes out of context.

TheFlyingGreenMonkey · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:39 am

I'm just curious. Is it more often one side who wins or is it even? Also can someone vote to lynch themselfs?

ronnieroo · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:52 am

One side has to win.

I've seen people do it before. IDK if the rules here allow for it though.

TheFlyingGreenMonkey · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:58 am

Unovote Vote:

TheFlyingGreenMonkey

Krauthammer · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:20 am

Ugh. Do you just really not want to play this game? If you're town (which I'm leaning towards) I'm going to be so angry.

KittyMo · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:52 am

TheFlyingGreenMonkey wrote:
Unovote Vote:
TheFlyingGreenMonkey

Can you please stop screwing with the game? It's important to play to win. Unless you're frustrated scum, we'd really appreciate it if you would not self-vote. If you're scum, go ahead and just keep doing what you're doing.

BlueRaven · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:10 am

just cus im going with the crowd:

Vote: KittyMo

Krauthammer · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:18 am

BlueRaven wrote:just cus im going with the crowd:

Vote: KittyMo

Okay, this is very, very skummy to me. You post one no content post and then come back just to put the third vote on a possible bandwagon, on your own admission? If you're going to vote for KittyMo, explain why, not just because of a blatant jokevote and a blatant OMGUS?

Vote: BlueRaven

geekalicious · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:26 am

BlueRaven wrote:just cus im going with the crowd:

Vote: KittyMo

BlueRaven, voting for another player and placing them at L-2 without any other justification than just going with the crowd is looking like an awfully scummy thing to do to me. Additionally, I've noted that you're the person with the least amount of commentary in the game thus far. Though I'm still watching TheFlyingGreenMonkey, I'm going to change my vote.

Unvote Vote: BlueRaven

BlueRaven · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:30 am

ac.... dam.... thats not good... i read a poll earlyer saying about a newbie mistake... i think im the person that just slipped up and did the newbie mistake.
I'll stand by my vote for now just to see what happens.

BlueRaven · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:32 am

sorry about double posting but i've changed my mind

unvote

xRECKONERx · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:38 am

Didn't realize that I still had my vote on KittyMo, so

unvote

.

And BlueRaven, I'm not even sure what you're talking about with the poll talking about newbie mistakes, and I'm not sure how that poll would be supportive of you voting for someone solely for the sake of bandwagoning.

Vote: BlueRaven

12Keyblade · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:38 am

TheFlyingGreenMonkey wrote:
Unovote Vote:
TheFlyingGreenMonkey

Three things:

1. Yes, you can vote for yourself.
2. IDK if that counts as it's not all bolded.
3. Voting for yourself is BADBADBAD!!! Don't do it until you commit more scumtells.

12Keyblade · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:40 am

Oh, crap.

FOS: BlueRaven

You're just lucky I don't want to give Scum a hammer (my vote would put you at L-1). Care to explain yourself?

xRECKONERx · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:41 am

^ Unless he

is

scum.

Krauthammer · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:43 am

Yeah, BlueRaven is as scummy as all hell, but no one else vote for him for now, we don't want this to end before it has to.

BlueRaven · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:43 am

>.> i cant explain my self, thats the thing, u cant tell if they are lieing or not. Thats the whole point of this game (as far as im aware.) I guess you'll just find out when i get lynched.

Krauthammer · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:45 am

Why did you vote for KittyMo?

BlueRaven · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:47 am

cus everyone else did... yep u think im scum, even i would XD i feel so stupid...