itacv2 (2) - ekiM, ZazieR
Exalt (2) - Sho Minamimoto, Debonair Danny DiPietro
Debonair Danny DiPietro (1) - Raivann
Santos (1) - ConfidAnon
Toro (1) - muzzz
ZazieR (1) - itacv2
I commented about you not being around.Exalt wrote:I NEED to catch up... plus I need to do that analysis wall post. This game has been on my backburner for a while... I'll try to focus on this game today when I have time.
: Just wondering... but most of you have been leaving me alone lately regarding the lurking. I have been lurking quite a bit yet no one seems to have taken much notice. Can I ask why?
@ everyone
Also
@ everyone: I'm going to do analysis post soon. Can everyone please explain their current suspicions of players so far in the game? I want to know where everyone stands before I make a huge post that could influence anything, just in case people decide to backpeddle and state they never had any type of suspicions on certain players.
Did you seriously ask that question after all the debate that happened early in the game?Santos wrote:Hey, what is 'zetta'?
You keep promising you're back and ready to participate. Maybe we are giving you the benefit of the doubt too much. I've basically been waiting for you and Kise to get back so the game can continue. There's just under a week until deadline now so it'd be really good if you did get that analysis done.Exalt wrote:@ everyone: Just wondering... but most of you have been leaving me alone lately regarding the lurking. I have been lurking quite a bit yet no one seems to have taken much notice. Can I ask why?
itacv2 is my prime suspect. His suggestion to lynch Raivann was by far the scummiest thing I've seen this game, and his attempt to backtrack and lie about having said that made things worse. I think he should be our lynch for today. I'm a bit bemused by how little attention this is getting.Exalt wrote:I'm going to do analysis post soon. Can everyone please explain their current suspicions of players so far in the game? I want to know where everyone stands before I make a huge post that could influence anything, just in case people decide to backpeddle and state they never had any type of suspicions on certain players.
I have one you never answered.Itacv2 wrote:I believe that i have addressed so far evry question you have dared to ask, is there anyone else who like to make a question, or should we proceed to Zazier in the matter of him making all the questions and nobody questioning him.
You did say you wanted Raivann dead, didn't you? That we should "test the case"? Even as you hedged your bets and said he might well be a townie, but lynching him anyway wouldn't be a disaster. Then you lied about it, and said you never moved against him. Then you ignored me when I pointed out the lie.ekiM wrote:itacv2, why do you ignore post 201? Look:
Itacv2 wrote:I still think That DDD has a chance to be a big shot scum, lol, but he makes a point.I think we might want to test the case.and might then watch the patterns of behavior , the bandwagoners and reactions to the lynch.
Why? If Raivann is lynched and he is town we might be short of one people but a nontalkative one, since he is counterproductive is not a big dealHow do you explain this contradiction?itacv2 wrote:But u saying that I WANTED RAIVANN dead, that i cant permit, becausei never said i wanted him dead, nor i made a move against him. I just explained my point of view in the current situation.
I already explained why I messed up about the DDD votes on Raivann. When Kise looked like a lost cause, no support to get him in the thread, I unvoted. At this point in the game I wouldn't have a problem lynching ZazieR becauseEkim wrote:I've had a bad feeling about Santos. He hasn't made a real vote all game as far as I can see. He followed DDD onto Raivann, said he liked the logic, then did a 180. Later he voted Kise for inactiveness and later unvoted. Why no real votes? What are his real suspicions?
What's wrong with scum hunting too hard? And being a null-tell in this game might be beneficial, and if you read the game rules (do it) you can see why. And isn't that vote you placed on Kise supposed to be the support to get him back in the thread?Santos wrote:I already explained why I messed up about the DDD votes on Raivann. When Kise looked like a lost cause, no support to get him in the thread, I unvoted. At this point in the game I wouldn't have a problem lynching ZazieR becauseEkim wrote:I've had a bad feeling about Santos. He hasn't made a real vote all game as far as I can see. He followed DDD onto Raivann, said he liked the logic, then did a 180. Later he voted Kise for inactiveness and later unvoted. Why no real votes? What are his real suspicions?
1) She is scum hunting almost too hard for her own good
2) Her play is incredibly null-tell
However, itacv2's defenses are rather crap.
Unvote?
Vote: itacv2
Lets do this.
1 - True, but she might also prove to be a key piece for our success as a town.Santos wrote:1) Having a town leader might prove to be too trustworthy and totally overlooked.
2) Her play style is a null-tell as it is in every game she plays. You seem like you're talking about null-tells in general. Why are you not addressing what I've specifically addressed?
3) Kise was replaced by ConfidAnon and he has contributed nicely as I wanted.
4) What's with the vote? You've simply voted without any reason.
No, for trying to start a bandwagon on ZazieR who's pretty much one of the town's most dominant players as of right now. I actually wasn't voting for you on the Kise/ConfidAnon situation at all, just on the case you've built on Zaz.Santos wrote:So you're voting me for unvoting Kise?
Yes he is, I'm wondering why does Santos want to hurry up the lynch when he could just pursue a new lead by just questioning Zazier, I mean seriously, we've got a little over a week yet?Raivann wrote:Isn't Santos voting itacv2 not Zazier?