MtG: Parallel Universe Mafia (fl's subgame): Game Over

[forbiddanlight]

"Paint gold upon the wind,
Shape the wind into a shield,
And vanish behind the brightness." - Flavor text, Curtain of Light

Regarding deadline review. FAIL! Forever! Ok, actually, just this time. Deadline is the 6th.

The Tenth Vote Count (aka the "Target attacking unblocked creature becomes blocked." Vote Count)

5) Budja (0)
25) SpyreX (0)
12) Kairyuu (0)
9) Sajin (0)
32) Quagmire (4): Porkens, SocioPath, SpyreX, jammer
33) Porkens (0)
35) SocioPath (0)
36) jammer (0)

Not Voting (8): Budja, Kairyuu, Sajin, Quagmire

Votes required to lynch:

5

Quagmire is at L-1

Current Deadline:

September 6, 2009 at ~1:00 P.M. EDT (GMT -5)

[Budja]

What would the Zaz flip tell you about Quag?

Scum Zazier would increase Quag's likelyhood of being scum IMO as he didn't join the wagon.

The first two points I made are more important. If Zaz isn't lynched quickly over there, I wouldn't bother waiting.

[SpyreX]

And if they are scum together a whole mess of whats going on is explained.

If he's posting and not here at L-1 I'm not going to shed a tear. I'd like to see a claim, but.

[Budja]

And if they are scum together a whole mess of whats going on is explained.

Such as? I see the recent links but what else?

I'd like to see a claim, but.

Well he's got a day or two before I will hammer.

[SpyreX]

Him not voting for zaz, allowing the other game to move his partner out. The "policy lynch is retarded business", etc.

If Quag is scum I'd be 80% on Zaz being scum too.

[Quagmire]

Huh? I go V/LA and you all this I'm mafia for going on vacation? Is this for real?

[Quagmire]

Just fyi... I didn't post in any of my games last night. Only GD. I got home at about 3 and watched 7 episodes of Jericho and posted in GD. Not enough time or motivation to reread the games I was in.

[Porkens]

Your defense is insultingly ineffective because since your lynch is not based, for me at least, on activity.

[Kairyuu]

@Quag: Claim or die. I am fully willing to hammer.

@all: College homework sucks, and takes priority over getting my thoughts posted.

[jammer]

@Kai & Saijin, thoughs?

[Quagmire]

Your defense is insultingly ineffective because since your lynch is not based, for me at least, on activity.

Are you serious right now? Then why are you voting for me? You're willing to lynch a player who was busy a couple days before going on vacation just for not delivering this? I was unexpectedly busy. RL happens.

Anyways, I guess I'll claim since this awful bandwagon is gonna get me lynched. I'm Kira, the Great Glass-Spinner... I'm an alignment cop. Last night I investigated jammer, and got a guilty. Hopefully that explains why I suddenly thought jammer was scummy today *cough cough*.

[Quagmire]

I can't express enough how stupid this bandwagon was.

vote: jammer

. SocioPath is scum too I'm willing to bet. SpryeX is just a dumb player. Mufasa is town because he's not newb-scum, he's just newb-town.

[jammer]

Oh my, that was unexpected.

A question.
Why did you vote Sociopath at the start of day, and not me? Makes sense to vote someone you

know

is scum, right?

[Quagmire]

Oh my, that was unexpected.

A question.
Why did you vote Sociopath at the start of day, and not me? Makes sense to vote someone you

know

is scum, right?

Because I didn't want to make it glaringly obvious what I was... then the scum would easily figure me out.

[SocioPath]

Hopefully that explains why I suddenly thought jammer was scummy today

It certainly helps.

Unvote

[jammer]

Quagmire,
You where going to get me subtle lynched by the end of the day?

In then meantime you ignored the wagon on zazie untill it hit L-1?

[jammer]

Also, I wonder how you will explain that you investigated me over sociopath.

[Porkens]

Easily testable.

unvote; vote: Jammer

Socio: not immediately voting for jammer means that you, too, are scum.

Hopefully that explains why I suddenly thought jammer was scummy today

It certainly helps.

Unvote

[Porkens]

...after unvoting, I mean.

[jammer]

Easily testable.

Can I add, that I prefer

testing

the cop claim, by lynching him.(and not me)

[Kairyuu]

@jammer: You would prefer we lynch the claimed cop over you? Pfft.

vote: jammer

[SocioPath]

Socio: not immediately voting for jammer means that you, too, are scum.

There were still at least a couple people saying they would hammer Quag as of the last of their posts, I was more concerned about an unexpected hammer. Not immediately voting means nothing. It should be clear that by unvoting I'm willing to test this claim.

Can I add, that I prefer testing the cop claim, by lynching him.(and not me)

That is illogical and ridiculous.

If both claims are true, and that you are scum and he is a cop...

If we lynch you, then scum dies, and night goes and cop dies.
That is one cycle of actions.

If we lynch Quag, cop get lynched, townie gets NK'd...next day you get lynched, townie gets NK'd.
A wasted days worth of actions, and 2 more town/neutral deaths.

Vote: jammer

[forbiddanlight]

jammer at L-1. Will do a proper votecount later

[Quagmire]

Also, I wonder how you will explain that you investigated me over sociopath.

Whenever I'm the cop I prefer testing players I don't have good reads on yet instead of ones I find to be likely scum. Especially on night one.

[jammer]

Holy, that was L-1 already?

Claim-time.
I am Keiga, the Tide Star, an even night vig.

Back to business.
If you give me the oppertunity, I will be shooting Quagmire the next night we hit.

According to the (flawed)logic of Sociopath(I can be pro-town, you know), if I flip scum, the cop will die anyway.
So, you could let me live this day and get some scum lynched (besides quag). And I will be shooting quag-scum in the night.

Simply stated, if quag lives through N2, or flips cop upon death. You have a simple lynch for tomorrow.
Can´t lose anything, only gain, amirite?

Unvote; Vote: SocioPath