ash is a little more suspicious, imo. he focused on crunchi but didn't really make an attempt to apply pressure, which kinda defeats the purpose of being suspicious towards somebody. I find that to be a little scummy, along with the whole being worried about "posting too much" when posting is part of what helps town figure out their reads.
Carrick16 wrote:Ok, whoeevr accused me of lurking, and saying ive played the game before so I should know how important it is to be active.
Firstly, this game is completely different from the one I played, secondly, I have been busy. But i'll try and contribute more, I'll be honest and say i've only skimmed through the recent posts. Ive got nothing to hide so ill just say the truth.
Feel free to ask me questions, cuz I havent been active and theres stuff ive not read, but im willing to answer anything. And I have no idea who to vote really so i'll have to go through this long thread tonight.
That would have been me!
Reread the entire game and provide us with your insights and suspects. If you haven't got the time to read 200 posts (which isn't a long thread), address #166 and after that. A few posts before 166 are also advised.
Carrick16 wrote:Feel free to ask me questions, cuz I havent been active and theres stuff ive not read, but im willing to answer anything. And I have no idea who to vote really so i'll have to go through this long thread tonight.
That post seems so anti-town to me to me, why do you feel that you should only responed to questions? If we were all like that we would get anywhere. You also say that you have no idea who to vote for, I thought you were all up for voting crunchi? what made you change your mind?
My Milked Eek wrote:Tubby unvoting isn't suspicious or distancing. Upon reading startrans' vote my first reaction was "must unvote". Not so much for the quickhammer, but if blue is indeed scum he might selfhammer to end the day. Which is far worse than a quickhammer.
I'm embarrassed I hadn't considered the selfhammer. It's a good point.
MME wrote:>> Startrans
Do you have any other suspects?
Yes, but none as scummy as Blue. Carrick16 for reasons stated. I dislike when somebody refuses to post content and ask for questions instead. It's silly, I don't want to read answers to questions, I want to see him at least attempt to scumhunt.
I would like to give Ash a harder time, but I'm not sure if his post quality is a deception. This is his second game and apparently the first wasn't too great. He's already getting plenty of heat, and I'll be watching for how he handles it. I know this will bother RayFrost as he will think I'm giving Ash too much newbie slack... but I really don't see his low caliber posts as particularly scummy. Yet.
W--L--A as town
24--14--0
W--L--A as scum
14--4--0
Carrick16 wrote:Feel free to ask me questions, cuz I havent been active and theres stuff ive not read, but im willing to answer anything. And I have no idea who to vote really so i'll have to go through this long thread tonight.
That post seems so anti-town to me to me, why do you feel that you should only responed to questions? If we were all like that we would get anywhere. You also say that you have no idea who to vote for, I thought you were all up for voting crunchi? what made you change your mind?
^good posting. I will get back to this in a minute.
startransmission wrote:
My Milked Eek wrote:Tubby unvoting isn't suspicious or distancing. Upon reading startrans' vote my first reaction was "must unvote". Not so much for the quickhammer, but if blue is indeed scum he might selfhammer to end the day. Which is far worse than a quickhammer.
I'm embarrassed I hadn't considered the selfhammer. It's a good point.
MME wrote:>> Startrans
Do you have any other suspects?
Yes, but none as scummy as Blue. Carrick16 for reasons stated. I dislike when somebody refuses to post content and ask for questions instead. It's silly, I don't want to read answers to questions, I want to see him at least attempt to scumhunt.
I would like to give Ash a harder time, but I'm not sure if his post quality is a deception. This is his second game and apparently the first wasn't too great. He's already getting plenty of heat, and I'll be watching for how he handles it. I know this will bother RayFrost as he will think I'm giving Ash too much newbie slack... but I really don't see his low caliber posts as particularly scummy. Yet.
Iwould agree with start here,
I am willing to cut ash some slack.
however carrick as pointed out before will earn my full attention once this blue matter is resolved one way or the other.
and on that note where the heck is blue???
"I swear tubby is scum in every game I've read, even some of the ones he wasn't in. "~Vi
"Whether you love him or hate him, Tubby is an excellent scumhunter."~BM
[b]need 0 replacements for open189 pm me[/b]
Don't worry, it depends on Ash how far that slack will go.
@Ash, where's that LoS?
RayFrost wrote:One question:
Why is ash suspicious when carrick isn't, considering they are both "newbs?"
I might be misunderstanding you, but both names you mention have are FoSes of other people. They both have attention drawn to them, I don't see a double standard.
W--L--A as town
24--14--0
W--L--A as scum
14--4--0
startransmission wrote:
I might be misunderstanding you, but both names you mention have are FoSes of other people. They both have attention drawn to them, I don't see a double standard.
I meant to reverse their names.
I was asking you specifically, since you gave one newbie slack (so did tubby) but not the other. They are both "newbs," so it'd logically mean they would both get the slack, if any is given for that reason.
rayfrost wrote:Blue should be posting, but it seems he's just going to let town lynch him without defending himself or claiming.
How do you get to this conclusion? And is this, in your opinion, scummy or not?
If he's not posting, knowing the town finds him suspicious, then he is displaying a lack of care, which is willingness to be lynched. He hasn't really defended himself, nor has he claimed.
rayfrost wrote:Blue should be posting, but it seems he's just going to let town lynch him without defending himself or claiming.
How do you get to this conclusion? And is this, in your opinion, scummy or not?
If he's not posting, knowing the town finds him suspicious, then he is displaying a lack of care, which is willingness to be lynched. He hasn't really defended himself, nor has he claimed.
Null tell at best.
well in my eyes its definately not helping him any.
"I swear tubby is scum in every game I've read, even some of the ones he wasn't in. "~Vi
"Whether you love him or hate him, Tubby is an excellent scumhunter."~BM
[b]need 0 replacements for open189 pm me[/b]
I would like some prodding happening on Carrick16,
Mod
.
And I would not use that against BlueRaven at this point yet. It's been a day since he last posted. If this were closer to the deadline I'd be more worried/suspicious of him not answering directly. But as said, at this point it's a null tell.
well MME if you look at Blue in iso you'll see he was averaging three posts per day in this thread. then once we all confimed that we would lynch him if his anawer don't jive. he claimed then posted once on wed.
it could be nothing but then agian it might be.
at any rate i am willing to wait
"I swear tubby is scum in every game I've read, even some of the ones he wasn't in. "~Vi
"Whether you love him or hate him, Tubby is an excellent scumhunter."~BM
[b]need 0 replacements for open189 pm me[/b]