RayFrost wrote:How is it an odd sentence?
I consider distancing a possibility whenever I see something like this... perhaps because I don't have the proper definition for it?
Anyway, I think my vote is on ash... it's staying.
I just find it odd, I'll get back on it during an eventual reread later on.
No, you were right in a way, she was distancing, but not from BlueRaven, she was distancing from the bandwagon/(mis)lynch on BlueRaven, which is scummy.
RayFrost wrote:Hey Blue!!!!!
Why don't you respond to the case made against you?
BlueRaven wrote:which case? the one MME sorta already delt with? I already commented on it.
Halfassed answers and only to the half of my case. Retry please.
BlueRaven wrote:But just giving my opinion, if i were her? I would defend me cus less experienced players are easyer targets later on in games. I'd focus on a different target or a lier, implying the 'lynch all liers polocy' or that she dosnt like his move and 'lynch for lieing'. Then tonight i'd probobly kill off the IC or anyone who proposes a possible threat. (But at this case its probobly everyone, so that was just a WIFOM) Even if im dead and this happens this confirms my suspissions.
I don't even know what this is supposed to be or what you're saying.
BlueRaven wrote:Oh and i forgot to add:
vote: D-V-7
i dont like the way he puposly lied about that. On my scum-o-meter he's just been bumped to first.
Great and then you go do the thing you say you'd do if you were pp.
purple princess wrote:I don't see a lie here.
Not a lie: backtracking.
pp wrote:PorkchopExpress wrote:@PP: Even though you (very quickly) threw in the towel in response to MME's request to explain your read, I'm not inclined to let you get away with not addressing the case against Blue. Actually reread the Blue discussion, and post some opinions on it. Who knows, you might even stumble across something that justifies your read along the way.
No thanks, I have said all I have to say on this matter for now.
No you haven't. Vote's staying.
pp wrote:My Milked Eek wrote:Once again, how does him being on LA imply that he is scum?
I have already done this once thanks.
No you haven't. You just rephrased your original statement.
LA = Limited Access = Genuine reason not to vote.
Now, again, why is Blue being on LA a sign of him being scum(my).
blue wrote:BlueRaven wrote:Then tonight i'd probobly kill off the IC or anyone who proposes a possible threat.
You do realise if this now happens tonight all fingers will be pointing at you tomorrow don't you?
Meh.