ZazieR wrote:
ZazieR wrote:SoG, why nothing against Post 36?
State why you didn't respond to them,
ZazieR wrote:Pome wrote:As you can see, I don't have very many reads, but I'm doing this because I think it's important to contribute.Noticed that. One scum read, two you think are town and all the others come basically down as neutral. So why did you make a list, instead of focusing your post mainly on the player you think is scummy?
Secondly, you write at SoG a bit that you don't think it's scummy to be not voting. Yet, it's SocioPath who attacks Manzcar for something like this on this page. Why didn't you point this out at SocioPath, especially when you said that you like his views?
Also, Zaz= he/him
ZazieR wrote:ForPome:ZazieR wrote:Pome wrote:As you can see, I don't have very many reads, but I'm doing this because I think it's important to contribute.Noticed that. One scum read, two you think are town and all the others come basically down as neutral. So why did you make a list, instead of focusing your post mainly on the player you think is scummy?
Secondly, you write at SoG a bit that you don't think it's scummy to be not voting. Yet, it's SocioPath who attacks Manzcar for something like this on this page. Why didn't you point this out at SocioPath, especially when you said that you like his views?
Also, Zaz= he/him
Kirby wrote:
Ok, maybe there was no buildup, but even if there wasn't, that makes it even more scummy.
Nachomamma8 wrote:
The first vote he places on Zazie looks like a pressure to get him to be active, rather than an attempt to get a lynch. And as for his supposed "hypocrisy"... I view that as an attempt to avoid saying that it's simply a pressure vote; after all, that would entirely remove its potentcy. Notice how he hints this with the phrase "I am a pressure vote guy though...".
That is a good point, I hadn't thought of that. However, it doesn't explain why semioldguy is still voting for Zazie and in fact pushing for his lynch for no good reason.
semioldguy wrote:If I am lynched the rest of the town should force you to address every single self reminder you've been noting in the thread. In fact, you should probably address them all now so we can lynch you and save the town from my mislynch.
ZazieR wrote:@Josh
What I don't like about your semi-random vote is:
-It was based upon lurking, while the game had started that day.
-You were the 11th player to post. Only Kirby (The one you voted based upon 'lurking') came after you.
ZazieR wrote:Josh wrote:*Except ZazieR, but I need to stay far, far away from the crazy right now.Then what are you calling me here?
Nachomamma8 wrote:My opinion on the bandwagon on semioldguy:
While I like the bandwagon in terms of the pressure it's giving, I can't say I'm a big fan of where the bandwagon's going. So far, the bandwagon on SoG has made everyone focus on his scumminess, leaving the rest of us in the dark. While I see mentions of what seems to be the general opinion right about now, I don't see it being a valid enough reason to put him at L-2, or even a valid enough reason to put my vote on him just yet.
The first vote he places on Zazie looks like a pressure to get him to be active, rather than an attempt to get a lynch. And as for his supposed "hypocrisy"... I view that as an attempt to avoid saying that it's simply a pressure vote; after all, that would entirely remove its potentcy. Notice how he hints this with the phrase "I am a pressure vote guy though...".
Also, I've been a big fan of semioldguy's aggressiveness; let's not forget who brought us out of the RVS, shall we? I'm getting a pro-town read from him simply because he doesn't seem afraid to mention what looks scummy, nor does he seem to tunnel on anyone; when he sees something scummy, he questions it.
As for who I actually find suspicious at this moment, that award falls to Budja. I'm not a big fan of his complete lack of questioning and scumhunting, and his little counting fiasco seemed to me like an attempt to push the Chamber bandwagon over the edge.
And because Im a big fan of encouragement, here's aVote: Budjato help the explanations come faster.
Nachomamma8 wrote:Also, I've been a big fan of semioldguy's aggressiveness; let's not forget who brought us out of the RVS, shall we? I'm getting a pro-town read from him simply because he doesn't seem afraid to mention what looks scummy, nor does he seem to tunnel on anyone; when he sees something scummy, he questions it.
Nachomamma8 wrote:That was just the very explanation I was looking for.
Unvote: Budja. Vote: Josh Lyman
That vote will not move until I see five posts from him.
That is a good point, I hadn't thought of that. However, it doesn't explain why semioldguy is still voting for Zazie and in fact pushing for his lynch for no good reason.
It seems to me that you have the two confused. SoG may still be voting for Zazie, but he definitely isn't fighting for the lynch. Right now, he seems to be defending himself, which I think he's doing a pretty good job of.
Josh Lyman wrote:ZazieR wrote:@Josh
What I don't like about your semi-random vote is:
-It was based upon lurking, while the game had started that day.
-You were the 11th player to post. Only Kirby (The one you voted based upon 'lurking') came after you.Okay, fine. Yes, it was based on lurking,on the first day.What is it about 'jokevote' that you don't get? And, yes, everybody else had posted; that's why I singled out Kirbyfor not posting.Can you say "overanalyzing?" I knew you could.
ZazieR wrote:ZazieR wrote:
ZazieR wrote:ZazieR wrote:SoG, why nothing against Post 36?
ZazieR wrote:Nachomamma8 wrote:Also, I've been a big fan of semioldguy's aggressiveness; let's not forget who brought us out of the RVS, shall we? I'm getting a pro-town read from him simply because he doesn't seem afraid to mention what looks scummy, nor does he seem to tunnel on anyone; when he sees something scummy, he questions it.SoG, your opinion of this quote please.