Mini 859 - Cleansing of Falls Church - Over
-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
DRK, what did you think about the merits of my vote on ConfidAnon back on page 5?Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
ConfidAnon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: July 15, 2009
Yes, I'm stretching the issue because the reaction you gave me when I first brought up the point was very defensive, and you continue to overreact. That's scummier than the original point, which is still valid.DeathRowKitty wrote:@CA
You're really trying to stretch this jester thing. Any particular reason (besides dodging SJ's question)?-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
I didn't think much of it at the time, since all he really did was say the theory wasn't bad, not that he believed it (and he even mentioned it would require BB to be playing a very weak scum game). Given CA's recent posts though, I think this gains a lot more merit.
I'm not seeing how the original point is valid at all...CA wrote:That's scummier than the original point, which is still valid.-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
[quote="DeathRowKitty"]I didn't think much of it at the time, since all he really did was say the theory wasn't bad, not that he believed it (and he even mentioned it would require BB to be playing a very weak scum game). Given CA's recent posts though, I think this gains a lot more merit.
If you don't mind, could you elaborate?Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
ConfidAnon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: July 15, 2009
-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
Well, here's the post you originally took issue with:
He acknowledged it wasn't "that bad of a theory," but then went on to say that he didn't think BB-scum would act like that and there was no vote or FoS accompanying this post. Basically, I didn't think it was as big of a deal as you made out of it.CA wrote:
To be honest . . . . that's not that bad of a theory.Looker wrote: Okay, just throwing it out there, shoot it down if you want.
You get the most votes, the closest to a lynch, and then BigBear votes no lynch.
Far_Cry votes BigBear for wanting a no lynch.
You vote Far_Cry.
Shoot it down.
One thing holding me back: I've seen BigBear play as scum. He's competent, and voting No Lynch is horrible scum play.
Fast forward 11 pages. CA makes an argument against me based on incorrect evidence and places a vote, which would make sense in the context of the post I linked to.
"We" implies both of us. Only one of us agrees to disagree (I disagree to the agreement that we agree to disagree). Do you think a discussion about jesters would have started because of my post had nook not mentioned jesters?CA wrote:We'll agree to disagree.-
-
ConfidAnon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: July 15, 2009
-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
If you actually believe the bolded, how do you still have a case on DRK?ConfidAnon wrote:Meh, I'm not gonna restate the case again. I believe that you were the one who sparked the jester discussion,you believe that you didn't and that nook did. We'll agree to disagree.Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
ConfidAnon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: July 15, 2009
-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
No, it was perfectly clear.
You believe that DRK thinks that nook started the jester conversation, correct?Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
Isn't it amazing that as humans, we can have beliefs about the beliefs of others?
Many species do not come anywhere close to possessing this faculty.Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
ConfidAnon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: July 15, 2009
I fail at wording posts. This is going to look scummy, but what I meant was that neither of us are going to change our minds on this matter. He says that nook started it, I say that he started it.Sanjay wrote:No, it was perfectly clear.
You believe that DRK thinks that nook started the jester conversation, correct?-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
Do you think that if DRK actually does believe that nook started the conversation about jesters then his reaction is unreasonable?Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
Shrinehme Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 324
- Joined: February 20, 2009
- Location: NJ/PA
Seemed unprovoked. I see little purpose for this tidbit thrown into his post: "Oh, by the way, you are a total idiot nook. And I never new you were gay." ... other than to start an argument with Nook, which could have strategic distancing value.ZazieR wrote:
How?Shrinehme wrote:
Far_Cry's insults looked more like strategic distancing than genuine emotion.ZazieR wrote:Post 97 – So the reason behind your vote is? (Shrine)
It's unfair to say Far_Cry could be called a "top suspect" of mine at that point. I did not analyze everyone's behavior up until that point and think he was most suspicious. The vote was thrown his way casually based on a mere observation/possibility.ZazieR wrote:
My reason for asking was more for the Bear part. Your vote was against Far_Cry at that moment. Yet, instead of asking EC what his opinion is of your top suspect (which was based upon you thinking he was distancing with Nook), you asked him about Bear. So why not one of your top suspicions?
Wanted to hear more from EtherealCookie.ZazieR wrote:Post 115 – Why ask EC about Bear,Shrine?
Didn't feel a need to do so. After he'd voted me I couldn't tell whether he was gambiting or taking advantage of RVS, or whatever.ZazieR wrote:
Your thoughts were that he was trying to draw scum out by voting no-lynch. But instead of voting the one who voted him for voting no-lynch, he voted you. Meaning, your thoughts were wrong. Yet, you didn't ask anything about it at all. Why?
He didn't back up his vote, so it was clear he wasn't planning to go anywhere with it.ZazieR wrote:Post 107 – Which is why Bear’s vote after the no-lynch was for you and not for FC? Why didn’t you address this vote from Bear when you thought he was trying to catch scum by voting no-lynch?
Actually, talking about this, how come you didn’t even ask anything about it?
You giving him a way out is also noted. (Shrine)
Re-phrase the first question?
Should I have?
Can you elaborate on "You giving him a way out is also noted."?
You're reading too far into the wording of the post then. It is poorly worded.ZazieR wrote:
Not buying your explanation. The only roles that are connected are: Masons/neighbours, lovers, scum and cult.
You're interpreting it wrongly. "Aligned" as in, being partnered with him via role [scum partners, ect.].ZazieR wrote:
Oh? How do you know?Shrine wrote:No, I don't feel that it's a bus. I am not Scum,let alone aligned with him. I don't really see how his vote could even be interpreted as a bus.
Also, how come you did comment on EC’s vote against you, but not Bear’s vote against you?
I commented on EtherealCookie's vote because he put forth a reason for his vote. BigBear gave me nothing to comment on.
Of which the first two don't bus, you say you're not scum and cult isn't possible now. I don't see the reason why you'd point the bolded out.
Tone of the game. My vote for him is nice for reaction-searching in RVS/early post-RVS. Not something to follow up with a lynch based off of.ZazieR wrote:
What changed?
I'm not interested in pursuing Far_Cry's/your lynch.ZazieR wrote:Post 250 – Why the unvote,Shrine?-
-
ConfidAnon Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: July 15, 2009
No I do not.Sanjay wrote:Do you think that if DRK actually does believe that nook started the conversation about jesters then his reaction is unreasonable?
I admit that my theory is not as strong now as when I first posted it, but the possibility still exists for him to be scum lying through his teeth after being caught.-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
What has changed, ConfidAnon?
Why isn't the theory as strong as it was before?Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
Looker theStenographerthe
- Stenographer
- Stenographer
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: February 20, 2009
- Pronoun: the
Okay wait. You lynch EC, he flips town, so then you lynch me? That sounds like a personal gameplan to me, Kitty...DeathRowKitty's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1907407#1907407]Post 361[/url] wrote:Mod, can we get a prod on nook?
We're on a new page? Zaz must have been posting again!
How does it show that (meta-based reasons?)?Zaz wrote:Post 325 shows that we're dealing with town-Looker and not scum-Looker.
Just a thought, but if EC gets lynched and flips town, I could see Looker as trying to gain townie points as scum by saying he thinks EC is a townie with an interesting playstyle.
Stick with one personality? I can't even stick with one gender! Zaz, r u the only one who knows I'm a she?EtherealCookie's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1907993#1907993]Post 394[/url] wrote:
I've had town-looker replace and act all anti-town. So, I wouldn't be sure about that. I don't think Looker'd be silly enough to just stick with one personality depending on if he was town or scum.ZazieR wrote:
Thanks ^.^Looker wrote:Zaz, you rock.
Post 325 shows that we're dealing with town-Looker and not scum-Looker.
Scummier than my alleged "creating undue suspicion"?Sanjay's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1908458#1908458]Post 412[/url] wrote:I agree. It does look scummy.
Sanjay's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1906025#1906025]Post 266[/url] wrote: I had taken your theory to be some kind of joke to try to get a rise out of people, but now that I find out you were seriously floating it, I think I'm gonna throw you a vote, for trying to create undue suspicion and for dodging my question for no good reason.
Unvote
Vote: Looker-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
Yeah, I don't really know why I'm still voting for you, when you aren't even second on my suspect list right now.
Unvote
Vote: ConfidAnonDon't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
Sanjay Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: August 6, 2009
- Location: A crowded movie theater
Now that you've reminded me of who I was voting for, Looker, why don't you tell me who you were voting for and how happy you are with that vote right now.Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk.-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
It's not OMGUS if I have a legitimate reason.CA wrote: I smell OMGUS in your last post, DRK.
Yes it does look like that. I seem to say something like that once per game...Looker wrote: Okay wait. You lynch EC, he flips town, so then you lynch me? That sounds like a personal gameplan to me, Kitty...
I view the possible connection much like I view the possible Shrine scum-slip. It's nothing to make a case on and unless you act scummy it's fairly meaningless. It's more a note I'm making now to come back to if you look scummy later on.
@CA
You missed this:I wrote:Do you think a discussion about jesters would have started because of my post had nook not mentioned jesters?-
-
Looker theStenographerthe
- Stenographer
- Stenographer
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: February 20, 2009
- Pronoun: the
I was voting for Cookie for forever (I think he was my RVS vote); however, when people started jumping on him, I unvoted. I'm currently happy with that unvote.Sanjay's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1908534#1908534]Post 419[/url] wrote:Now that you've reminded me of who I was voting for, Looker, why don't you tell me who you were voting for and how happy you are with that vote right now.
@BigBear & IdiotKing: Are you still happy with your current position on the Cookie wagon?-
-
Looker theStenographerthe
- Stenographer
- Stenographer
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: February 20, 2009
- Pronoun: the
Just in case you forgot, because it was a while ago.BigBear's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1895569#1895569]Post 123[/url] wrote:Unvote:
Vote: EtherealCookie
I think you put shrine at L-1, which is too close to a lynch for my liking.
I'll answer the other questions shortly. Just slightly busy.Idiotking's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1901196#1901196]Post 186[/url] wrote:Thoughts:
I had no idea what was going on until page 6 or so, to be honest. I couldn't tell what was RVS, sarcasm, or serious. You folks make my brain hurt.
As for scumtells:
I think Far_Cry is an interesting case, jumpy. He seemed to get serious far before anyone else did, and reacted... oh, what's the term... negatively? Now that he's replacing out I feel somewhat sad, because now the replacement can't elaborate on what Far_Cry was thinking.
EC also annoys me like all hell. I think it's suspicious to withhold information and reasoning for one's actions (I hate gambits and anything that could be mistaken as such), which makes EC out to be a living, breathing scumtell.
Unvote
Vote EC
On the other hand I don't see BB's actions as suspicious. Anything to generate discussion is a good thing, and if he did really vote for a no-lynch to get us out of RVS, I applaud that, especially since without it we'd probably still be in RVS.
One other thought:
It's natural to assume there's a Godfather in games of Mafia. As far as I can remember I've never been in a gamewithoutone, so I can understand why folks would expect there to be one.-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Define 'jumpy'ConfidAnon wrote:
He was being pretty jumpy there . . . that's kind of scummy.ZazieR wrote:Though this wasn't aimed at you, I wouldn't mind if you'd respond to this as well, confid
Post 331?
He wasn't contributing, which, when combined with the bandwagon vote, was very scummy. I know I'm sounding hypocritical here, but I have since made an effort to start contributing more. He really hasn't.ZazieR wrote:The guy who bandwagoned himself doesn’t like that somebody else bandwagons? How come?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
You're wrong. It's not the many posts that makes players ignore some posts. It's my super hot chickness It gets injected into my posts and it draws every player their attention to itSanjay wrote:
I want to keep everything from getting buried under a mountain of multi-posts and I thought throwing out empty threats would be a good way to do it.ZazieR wrote:
Your reason for this post?Sanjay wrote:Come on, ConfidAnon. We can't lynch everyone that posts like ZazieR.
Seriously though, I don't have problems with many posts after each other. As long as most of them contains scumhunting/content.Ignore the ''R''
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.